@TeamYouTube@YouTubeCreators
Hi, I’m the creator of Eulko.
I’m posting from a new X account because I unfortunately lost access to my previous one after getting locked out, and I can no longer access the old DM thread.
Before that happened, TeamYouTube had already responded to my case, moved me to DM, and asked me to complete the ownership verification steps for my channel, which I did successfully.
I’m trying to reconnect here so this case can continue from where it left off. My channel is Eulko, and I’m still requesting a proper re-review of the reused content/YPP decision.
Could you please DM this new account so I can continue the case from here?
Thank you.
I’ve been seeing other creators say their channels were re-reviewed and monetization was restored after these demonetization waves, so I’m asking again respectfully for my case to be looked at too.
My appeal videos are still avaliable on my channel. I explained my workflow, editing process, and the effort that goes into every video. That evidence is still there to review.
What makes this even harder is that after the first demonetization, one of my separate channels was also suspended due to related-channel association because the first case remained unresolved. Because of that, I now can’t properly move forward with monetization on my accounts, and this situation has kept spreading beyond just the original channel.
I’ve taken huge risks and made real sacrifices to pursue YouTube as my job. This whole situation has hurt me mentally and physically, and all I’m asking for is one fair human review and some justice.
My channel:
https://t.co/DAqAEb1ueh
@YouTube@YouTubeCreators@TeamYouTube
Selling a 92k followers monetised shorts channel ($10k)
Made close to $20K in 4 months ($0.25 rpm) and the plaque will most likely be available to claim
Don't have enough time to manage it + bored of the content
sop's included + editor ($40/video every 1-2 days)
DM me to buy
Hey @TeamYouTube@YouTubeCreators … I really need your help. It’s been almost 2 weeks since I started emailing support with Case ID 2-2666000040784 and all I’ve gotten are copy-pasted templated responses. No real human has actually looked at my case. This is wrongful demonetization and it’s breaking my heart.
Here’s exactly what happened:
1) April 14 → My channel got hit with a “reused content” claim and suspended from YPP.
2) April 19 → Over the week, I recorded and edited my full appeal video showing my entire process (timestamps 1:54–4:12): idea → scripting → custom voiceover → heavy editing + skull animations + before/after transformations. It clearly fits YouTube’s own “DO” categories. I submitted it on 19th April.
3) April 20 → One day later they rejected it saying the editing “didn’t substantially change the original work.”
That reason is factually false. My appeal video literally walked through every single step with timestamps, before/after comparisons, and custom skull animations.
On the day they rejected it (April 20th), that appeal video had only 3 views and 43 seconds average watch time (in which some of the views are my own) — they never even reached the editing process. It was dismissed without being watched.
After, I kept emailing support and went public on X, they suddenly flipped the entire reason to “inauthentic content” (mass-produced, templated, minimal variation, slideshows with low narrative, etc.).
This flip is the biggest red flag of all.
I’ve been liaising with them for 2 weeks via email — every single reply has been a generic template that ignored all my evidence.
Then out of nowhere the violation changed to something that fits my channel even less. My videos are original scripted commentary with custom voiceovers and unique skull animations on every single video.
If a real human had actually watched my appeal video and reviewed the timestamps and evidence, this sudden flip would have been impossible. This proves the case was never properly reviewed — it was just bounced between automated systems looking for any reason that sticks.
4) This isn’t compliant with EU Digital Services Act Articles 17, 20, 21, 14 & 15 (my payments go through Ireland).
I’m not asking for special treatment. I’m just asking for basic transparency and a real human review of the evidence I already submitted.
I’m genuinely asking for an actual human reviewer + supervisor (or someone from Community Outreach) to look at Case 2-2666000040784 properly.
I just uploaded a full long-form video explaining everything. Please watch it. I’ve put my whole heart into this channel and I’m losing revenue every single day.
All I need is one real person to actually look at the timestamps and evidence. That’s it. Thank you
#TeamYouTube #YPP #YouTubePartner
@MovieTalkNOW1@AuralixStudio@YellowFlashGuy@timdanilovhi@olleshortz
Another update on my Eulko monetization case:
I appealed, showed my workflow, explained my editing process, completed verification when contacted, and still the only direction I’ve been given is to wait 90 days and reapply.
The problem is that I still don’t know what exactly was considered insufficient.
So if I reapply later while still making the same style of edits, what is supposed to be different?
That is why I’m still asking for real clarity or a proper review of the appeal I already submitted.
My channel: https://t.co/DAqAEb1ueh
@YouTube@YouTubeCreators@TeamYouTube
Hey there mate, can you add me to the list too? 🥹
I've followed you 🧡
Channel name: Eulko
Channel username: @ eulko
Subscriber count: 114,000
Status: Demonetised
Latest Demonetization / Termination reason: Reused content
Latest Demonetization / Termination date: 2026. 4. 3
Reinstatement date: -
X account: eulko_
Another update on my Eulko YPP case:
I already submitted appeals, explained my workflow in detail, showed my editing process, and even completed the verification step after TeamYouTube contacted me.
But the only answer I’ve been left with is to wait 90 days and reapply.
My issue is simple:
if I still haven’t been clearly told what specifically was considered insufficient, then how is reapplying in 90 days supposed to lead to a different outcome?
I’m not asking to endlessly repeat appeals.
I’m asking for real clarity on what would actually need to change, because without that, the same result could happen again no matter how long I wait.
My channel: https://t.co/DAqAEb1ueh
@TeamYouTube@YouTubeCreators
Day 3 update on my Eulko YPP case:
TeamYouTube’s latest response was that I should wait 90 days and reapply to YPP.
My issue is that this still gives me no clear explanation of what specifically was considered insufficient, which means I could wait 90 days, reapply, and still face the exact same result again.
I already submitted an appeal showing my editing workflow, timelines, and how my videos are transformed. So at this point, I’m simply asking for real clarity: if re-review is not possible, what exactly would need to change before reapplying?
Without that, the 90-day wait doesn’t actually solve the problem.
My channel: https://t.co/DAqAEb1ueh
@TeamYouTube@YouTubeCreators
Day 2 update on my Eulko YPP case:
@TeamYouTube told me they can’t help with another appeal and that I should wait 90 days to reapply.
My Channel URL: https://t.co/DAqAEb1ueh
My issue is that I’m not asking to submit a brand new appeal just for the sake of it. My concern is that if I reapply in 90 days without any specific explanation of what was considered insufficient, I could end up getting the exact same result again.
My appeal already showed my editing workflow, how my videos are transformed, and why my content does not fall under the “Don’t” examples of reused content.
So right now, I’m simply asking for clarity:
If re-review is not possible, what specifically would need to change before reapplying?
Without that, “wait 90 days” does not solve the problem, it only delays it.
@YouTubeCreators
Thank you for the response @TeamYouTube
Just to clarify, I’m not asking to submit another appeal. I’m asking whether my already submitted appeal video and channel can be manually re-reviewed, because I believe the evidence in that appeal was not fully considered.
My concern is that if I simply wait 90 days and reapply without any specific feedback on what was lacking, I may receive the same result again even though my editing process is substantial and transformative.
If another review of the existing appeal is not possible, could you please clarify whether the decision is now fully final, and whether you can provide any more specific guidance on what would need to change before reapplying to YPP?
Thank you.
@TeamYouTube@YouTubeCreators
Hi, I’m the creator of Eulko.
I’m posting from a new X account because I unfortunately lost access to my previous one after getting locked out, and I can no longer access the old DM thread.
Before that happened, TeamYouTube had already responded to my case, moved me to DM, and asked me to complete the ownership verification steps for my channel, which I did successfully.
I’m trying to reconnect here so this case can continue from where it left off. My channel is Eulko, and I’m still requesting a proper re-review of the reused content/YPP decision.
Could you please DM this new account so I can continue the case from here?
Thank you.
Hi TeamYouTube, I’m the creator of Eulko.
I lost access to the account that was originally messaging you here, but I had already completed the ownership verification step for my channel. I’m reaching back out from this new account so the case can continue.
Could you please DM me here? Thank you.