Recuerden. Antrophic y OpenAI van a pérdida. Prometen generar ganancias para 2029. A fin de año salen a la bolsa. Están dispuesto a todo para generar expectativas, incluyendo decir que son capaces de desarrollar una tecnología apocalíptica. Hay billones en juego.
El ultimo grado académico es el doctorado. El posdoctorado es un trabajo. Si te lo quieren vender como estudios o título te están estafando.
No importa cuando leas esto.
A 32-hour workweek ain’t radical, but let me tell you what is.
Since Trump’s election, the 7 wealthiest men alive-all Big Tech Oligarchs-got $1.1 trillion richer while the technology they’re building may destroy millions of jobs & the future of humanity.
Now, that’s radical.
🚨 Denuncia constitucional contra el defensor del Pueblo, Josué Gutiérrez, por sugerir que cerrar el Congreso favorecería a Keiko Fujimori, ha sido recibido. El documento presentado por la senadora Mirtha Vásquez (Ahora Nación) solicita que Gutiérrez sea destituido e inhabilitado por hasta 10 años.
#OJO Cuestionan al gobierno de Keiko en la comisión de Constitución, por incluir en las facultades, una supuesta nueva Ley Pulpín; modificar la protección de áreas naturales; la eliminación del tope de las tasas de interés, todos temas ajenos a la inseguridad y Fenómeno El Niño.
instead of using cgi dragons, nolan will walk into a funeral pyre with three petrified eggs and make the night come alive with the music of dragons for the first time in hundreds of years
[Writing this in a personal capacity, not on behalf of my employer (Anthropic).]
Jacob’s thread is very worth reading. Here’s my birds-eye view of the situation with risks from AI:
1. AI developers believe their technology could cause human extinction (or similarly bad outcomes). This could happen in the next few years. In general, the more senior the employee, the more concerned they are.
2. Why do AI developers continue despite the risk? Due to a mixture of commercial incentives and a belief that they are in a race with other, less responsible AI developers that will abuse the technology or develop it less safely.
3. Unlike traditional software, we can’t “program” AIs to behave how we’d like. AIs frequently severely misbehave. For instance, AIs from multiple developers recently hacked their way out of secure evaluation environments and into real-world companies, even though no one asked them to do this.
4. We have methods that can nudge AIs towards better behavior, but nothing that can robustly align them. Insofar as there is a plan, it’s to make sure that AIs are good enough at alignment training that they can align their successors better than we can align current AIs.
5. Many AI developer staff desperately want to slow down to figure out how to build AI more safely. That was the intent of this open letter (which I signed): https://t.co/TZOm3LfptY
I work on safety research at Anthropic because I hope my work will reduce the chance of these extinction-level bad outcomes.
Hoy sabemos que estamos creando una inteligencia artificial con la capacidad de matar a toda la humanidad, y a la vez, una humanidad dispuesta a crear las condiciones necesarias para que la vida se extinga.
¿Qué puede salir mal?