@realMaalouf While holding and valuing personal religious beliefs is a fundamental right, these convictions must remain private and should never be publicly imposed, forced upon minors, used to dictate secular legislation, or allowed to substitute for rational deliberation.
Did you know Muslims never donate Organs because It's Haram in Islam ?
However they are absolutely fine with accepting organs from Kafirs.
If that's inaccurate, show me the evidence.
I'm waiting.
Let me trace the timeline here because nobody's connecting it.
Step 1: Scrape the entire internet. Every book, every article, every conversation, every piece of art, every forum post. Do it without asking. Do it without paying.
Step 2: Train a model on all of it. Call it "artificial intelligence."
Step 3: Go to BlackRock's Infrastructure Summit and announce: "We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us on a meter."
Step 3 is where you sell people's own knowledge back to them. On a meter.
They took the collective output of human thought, compressed it into a model, and now they want to charge you by the token to access a version of what you and everyone you know already created.
One Reddit user put it perfectly: "They stole all this data from us, the people, our life's work, creativity, art, by devouring the internet and blowing through all copyright laws. Now they want to sell it back to us in the form of a utility."
Imagine if someone photocopied every book in the public library, burned the library down, and then opened a subscription service for the copies.
That's the metered intelligence business model.
And they're pitching it to infrastructure investors as though they invented water.
@realMaalouf While holding and valuing personal religious beliefs is a fundamental right, these convictions must remain private and should never be publicly imposed, forced upon minors, used to dictate secular legislation, or allowed to substitute for rational deliberation.
@realMaalouf While holding and valuing personal religious beliefs is a fundamental right, these convictions must remain private and should never be publicly imposed, forced upon minors, used to dictate secular legislation, or allowed to substitute for rational deliberation.
The Chronological Contradiction Argument:
Premise 1: The Gospel of Matthew states Jesus was born during the reign of Herod the Great (Matthew 2:1).
Premise 2: Historical records confirm Herod the Great died in 4 BCE.
Premise 3: The Gospel of Luke states Jesus was born when Quirinius was governor of Syria and conducted a census (Luke 2:1-2).
Premise 4: Historical records confirm Quirinius became governor and conducted this census in 6 CE, ten years after Herod's death.
Premise 5: A single individual cannot be born in two different years that are 10 years apart.
Conclusion: Therefore, the biblical narrative of Jesus’s birth contains a factual error, rendering the combined historical account of his birth false.
Key Historical Details proving the argument:
•Herod's Death (4 BCE): Matthew's narrative relies on Herod being alive to order the execution of the infants in Bethlehem.
•Quirinius's Census (6 CE): Judea did not become a Roman province requiring a Roman census until Archelaus (Herod's son) was deposed in 6 CE.