Hello X users
I had a thought I really wanted to share…
I realized I respond REALLY WELL to positive reinforcement when it comes to things I want to learn. I cannot think of one time I wanted to continue doing something when my teacher was a strict “tough love” person
Hello X users
I had a thought I really wanted to share…
I realized I respond REALLY WELL to positive reinforcement when it comes to things I want to learn. I cannot think of one time I wanted to continue doing something when my teacher was a strict “tough love” person
Getting a strong urge to make origami flowers but the colored paper is in a drawer in my brothers’ room that makes a lot of noise and I will most certainly get yelled at if I try to open it
When I was a child I used to watch this guy’s channel and this was the first paper craft I ever made. The nostalgia is reminding me of when I used to quietly fold paper in the dark while everyone else was asleep https://t.co/c6ZgJNZrtF
The most puzzling AI-ism to me is probably the "Not x. Not y. But z."
Not the em-dashes (an essential piece of punctuation). Not "That isn't x, it's y" (a useful if inelegant way to clarify an argument). But consecutive examples of what your subject isn't -- conveyed in fragmentary, staccato sentences -- before a declaration of what it is.
Feel like this is an inherently irritating rhetorical device. And I don't recall regularly coming across it in pre-AI writing. So, I don't understand why LLMs are so in love with the template
A fundamental truth you will have to accept if you want to understand contemporary society is that a lot of male angst is entirely self-imposed. It truly is “all his own making, a war with himself”