Imagine driving from NYC to LA without ever stopping to re-charge. Imagine your car re-charges wirelessly. With EverGreen Technology, the future is now.
2021 U.S. Patent No. 11,040,630 - wireless roadway constant charging technology for electric vehicles - check it out - roadway wireless charging instead of stationary charging tech - the future is now
Shortly, there will be a “choice” for wireless roadway charging for EV’s employing a constant a low energy electromagnetic field, down and across a dedicated lane of travel. Imagine being able to travel from the east coast to the west coast on the highway without ever having to exit the roadway to recharge your vehicle. Shortly, we will post the results of the computer simulation tests comparing Electreon’s charging rates, costs, electricity usage, etc against our technology - the results will be shocking.
Translated - Our Sun accounts for about 99.86% of the total mass in our solar system because our solar system formed from a collapsing nebula where most material coalesced into the central star, leaving scraps to form the orbiting bodies. But we are not alone and tomorrow opens great new doors to knowledge
I want to try something new and ask everyone to indulge me for 31 seconds in a bipartisan endeavor.
In an era of unprecedented congressional polarization, for the next 30 days, I suggest that we, “common Americans” participate in a grassroots experiment to advance “common ground” proposed legislative action that President Trump and the majority of congressional Democrats and Republicans can jointly support.
Maybe, if we can find common ground sensible proposed legislative action, we can force congressional Republican and Democrats to begin working together constructively. Let’s call this experiment, “Project Baby Steps”.
Let's start this process with a “low-hanging fruit” item: President Trump said in August of 2025 that he would like to federally reschedule cannabis from a Schedule I drug to a Schedule III drug; meaning the federal government would recognize that cannabis offers some form of medicinal benefit and therefore it can be utilized more openly for medical research purposes.
It also means that the federal banking system can work with the cannabis industry on expanding its operations and, as a result, gives the government a greater revenue stream from the added tax revenue.
Congressional Democrats have been screaming about the decriminalization of cannabis and the rescheduling of it as well, so I cannot imagine that they could object to proposed legislation to decriminalize it on the federal level.
By doing so, gives a win to our President and gives congressional Democrats a win as well.
Next, let's explore the issue first addressed by Warren Buffet and commonly referred to as the suggested “Buffet Rule”. In creating the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB), President Trump said that he wanted to create a “fairer” tax code for all Americans with the intent of lowering the overall tax rate for all income groups.
A review of the new tax code shows that it was a good start, but we can build upon it with a simple tweak that I think most members of Congress and President Trump can support.
In 2011, Warren Buffett pulled back the curtain on the tax code and told the American audience a dirty little secret that, based on how he receives his income annually, he has a lower effective tax rate than the tax rate applicable to his secretary.
Buffett's suggested the creation of a minimum effective federal tax rate (30%) on adjusted gross income (AGI) for taxpayers earning $1 million or more per year, so that all Americans pay their fair share in taxes.
As to why wealthy people like Warren Buffett pay a lower federal tax rate on their income, the answer lies in how he and many other wealthy individuals receive their income. Buffett admitted that receives all or virtually all of his income in the form of dividends on his investments, rather than in the form of W-2 wages.
By example, in 2025, if a wealthy taxpayer earns all or virtually all of his $2,500,000 in income from dividends or from similar investments, the maximum amount he will pay in federal taxes on his $2,500,000 income would be approximately 22.3% for a single payer. Conversely, under the suggested “Buffett Rule”, with a minimum federal tax obligation of 30%, on that same 2,500,000 of dividend income, that taxpayer would pay 30.12% in federal taxes or about 6.3% more in federal taxes on the same income source.
Implementing this simple change (increasing the tax obligation by 6%) would generate an estimated $140–$160 billion in additional annual revenue for the United States for 2025 and each year hereafter, which could help fund infrastructure, education, or deficit reduction—benefits that should appeal across party lines.
The purpose of this suggested exercise is not to point fingers at either side of the aisle, but to start the process of pushing our legislative members to find compromise on issues where agreement can be had instead of continued paralysis.
We, as Americans, have stood on the sidelines for too long, watching a cockfight between and among congressional members, lining their own pockets while in office (both sides), and presuming we are all too stupid to understand their actual agendas.
Who know, maybe if we approach these type of issues differently, we can revisit those tough issues tomorrow and find solutions there as well.