@ReBeastz@someballfacts@redactedfan Pinto has leaked documents he obtained illegally
Pinto shows Stovall the documents .
Stovall needs proof documents are credible
Asks pinto for proof
Stovall turns it over to metro police
Police opens court case based on credible evidence that was submitted
@ReBeastz@someballfacts@redactedfan Using a leaked document proving Ronaldo admits to rape is now apparently throwing shit at a wall hoping it sticks? I know what type of person you are. I don’t defend rapists. You do.
@ReBeastz@someballfacts@redactedfan Are you stupid on purpose or is that just how you are? It’s an analogy to show that the laws of the USA are crap when it comes to inadmissible evidence. I refuse to believe someone can be this misinformed on the law.
Do you not understand what an analogy is?
@ReBeastz@someballfacts@redactedfan You’re in denial of what Ronaldo himself has said. This is his recollection of events admitting to it. You can turn the other away all you’d like . Ronaldo is a rapist. A self admitting one to.
@ReBeastz@someballfacts@redactedfan No it doesn’t. You have no idea what you’re talking about. Bad faith means the evidence was obtained in ways that aren’t legal. It absolutely does not mean the documents aren’t true. That’s why the case was dismissed. Never does the court case mention the documents are false.
@ReBeastz@someballfacts@redactedfan Completely ignoring the fact that you need to prove evidence to be credible enough for it to be even used in the first place but sure it’s “just trust me bro” that’s not how the law works. Maybe 200 years ago but not now. You can’t just accuse someone and expect a court case.
@ReBeastz@someballfacts@redactedfan Station and say “ yea I have proof here it is” and expect something out of it. You need to prove credibility which is what mayorgas lawyers did by contacting pinto and having him show the leaked files.
@ReBeastz@someballfacts@redactedfan It is not a matter of questioning. This literally opened up a court case based on credible evidence. You have a very bad misunderstanding of how much a piece of evidence needs to be proved credible in order for a court case to open. You can’t just walk into a police
@ReBeastz@someballfacts@redactedfan You’re not arguing in good faith because you claim documents don’t have any credibility because a country deems the way they were obtained to be “wrong” if a video surfaces of a man beating a child but was obtained illegally, that’s no longer evidence anymore.
@ReBeastz@someballfacts@redactedfan How did she start it? Because Ronaldo said she made herself available? What part of her just laying in bed = making herself available?
You can 100% take back consent . If you are having sex and you say no. I don’t want it anymore. And you continue that is rape.
@ReBeastz@someballfacts@redactedfan Documents found in bad faith don’t mean anything. It only shows how credible evidence can get dismissed because it’s not obtained in a “correct manner” that the country has deemed “right”
Doesn’t make him out to commit the crime? Are we just skipping over the “NO” she said “NO”?
@ReBeastz@someballfacts@redactedfan If the metro police didn’t believe the documents to be legit , which they did by the way, no court case would have been opened. Yet there was and was dismissed based on how the documents were obtained . Not the credibility.
@ReBeastz@someballfacts@redactedfan Did you read the court case? Did you read how Stovall the person who handed the metro police the documents needed proof from pinto showing the documents are legit? Do you know that in order for someone to even be charged or have a court case there needs to be sufficient cause?
@ReBeastz@someballfacts@redactedfan Relevance? Someone who got a prison sentence now can’t be credible ?
This was never a court matter until 2018 and you’re ignoring that. Its fundamental and shows Ronaldo’s actions when being accused don’t match that of someone who claims “innocent “
@ReBeastz@someballfacts@redactedfan Are you just going to sit here and deny she said no? Why is it that you’re just not covering that part? How about the part where Ronaldo admits she said no and apologized for it? Why don’t you talk about that
@ReBeastz@someballfacts@redactedfan No it does not mean that every accusation is true. That’s not what’s being said. What’s being said is that to prove your innocence when claiming innocence should be easy if the crime never happened. Ronaldo’s actions and history prove otherwise. He is a walking contradiction
@ReBeastz@someballfacts@redactedfan If the crime never existed in the first place.
Mind you Ronaldo was never even charged with rape to begin with. Yet he still settled ? Why? Why settle if you’re not even being charged . Why settle if it’s just another women making up things ? Why settle if you claim innocent.
@ReBeastz@someballfacts@redactedfan You cannot have consensual non consensual sex. It is one or the other. It is rape or it is not.
Saying no is already enough to show that it’s non consensual therefore rape.
Also yea if I get accused of something I would need to prove I’m innocent. Shouldn’t be hard