Fun Facts: If Flare achieves 50,000% increase like XRP , the price for Flare will be $11.50 💥 If Flare achieves 13,000% increase like XLM , the price will be $3 💥
Tip to ALL Crypto holders using exchanges and accounts with SMS 2FA. Do this NOW!
Ring your mobile network and have them block issuance of eSIM and Physical SIMs without increased security.
I was targeted, only noticed when my phone disconnected.
#XRP#XRPArmy#XRPCommunity
I don't have the numbers in front of me, but I'm pretty sure XRP's use as a bridge in Ripple Payments dwarfs every other asset.
I think stablecoins win for collateral use cases (volatile collateral is annoying) and edge use cases (volatility at the on/off ramps is also annoying). For almost everything else, I still think digital assets work better. Unless you're risk averse, you'd probably prefer to hold most top tier digital assets over cash.
I also think that more use of XRPL for real financial use cases will translate to more utility and value for XRP. XRP has a privileged place on the XRP Ledger and is not as likely to get worked around as, say, ETH has been.
What you’re referring to is a well-documented and ultimately inconsequential quirk from the XRP Ledger’s earliest days, when the first 32,569 ledgers, roughly the first week of network activity weren’t permanently archived due to early infrastructure limitations. This wasn’t a consensus failure, and no transactions were reversed or lost from a functional standpoint. XRP Ledger’s architecture ensures that every single ledger contains a full snapshot of the current system state. So even without those initial records, the network remains mathematically and cryptographically intact. Ledger #32,570 became the de facto genesis only because resetting the ledger index would have caused unnecessary disruption, not because the chain lacked integrity.
Bitcoin had its own share of issues in the beginning too. Early bugs, partial block validation inconsistencies, and even Satoshi’s own edits to the codebase were needed to keep the system running. If we judged Bitcoin purely by its earliest glitches, it would never have become what it is. The reality is that all decentralized systems evolve from imperfect foundations. The XRP Ledger has not experienced a chain reorg or consensus failure in over a decade, something that even Bitcoin and Ethereum can’t claim.
So the idea that this ledger gap somehow undermines XRP’s legitimacy is either a misunderstanding or willful misrepresentation. Especially when the XRP Ledger is one of the most resilient, efficient, and enterprise ready chains in existence, processing transactions in seconds at negligible cost, with no need for mining or massive energy consumption. The cult narrative is lazy and people support XRP because it works, not because they’re stupid.
🚨 RIPPLE MASTER PLAN 🤯
Banks don't need SWIFT anymore. Ripple is the future.🔥
Using ISO 20022 + $XRP = settle MASSIVE transactions FAST & CHEAP.
We’re talking < $10 vs $1,000 👀
Ripple’s utility > any other bank. This is the moment.💥
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse @bgarlinghouse is currently testifying before the U.S. Senate Banking Committee, advocating for clear cryptocurrency regulations, a robust market framework, and U.S. leadership in blockchain innovation.