At the dusk of every era, the same archetype emerges: a well-intentioned but weak liberal figure, attempting to negotiate with forces beyond their comprehension
One of the most profound revelations of our era has been the unmasking of a striking truth: the far right and the far left, despite their apparent opposition, converge in their essence
wokesim blew open the overton window, it ruined science and civil institutions, so illiterate, terrible-in-school-know-nothing-lunatics are now out, and there are many of them and they have followers..
Its far from over. Tyler will be convicted, and possibly shot, and they will still claim something contrary to reality. We are not dealing with rational people that are usually kept in a box - the wokeism blew open the overton window, ruined science and institutions, so illiterate bad-in-school-know-nothing lunatics are out, and there are many of them and they have followers
-Autopsy: Single gunshot wound to the neck with .30-06 bullet fragments.
-Admissions: Robinson confessed FOUR times — in text messages, letters, and witness testimony.
-Forensics: His DNA was found on the murder weapon and the towel used to conceal it.
-Campus Footage: Caught on UVU security cameras 4 times on the 10th and 11th.
-Roommate Testimony: Lance Twiggs testified that Robinson was etching the engraved bullets later found with the weapon, identified Robinson in security footage and said Robinson confessed.
-Robinson caught on surveillance camera on the roof of UVU pulling the trigger.
@MandiesewStone@RealCandaceO back to the kitchen amanda. Also, look up Daniel Kahneman and system1 system2 to learn more about yourself. Feminism did not liberate you from your own biology, you emotional moron
• First interview: Early morning of September 12, 2025, at the St. George Police Department.
• Second interview: April 20, 2026, at the Utah County Attorney’s Office.
Key personnel involved (per testimony from Utah State Bureau of Investigation Agent Brian Davis):
• Agent Brian Davis (primary interviewer/testimony witness).
• Utah County Attorney’s Office prosecutor Ryan McBride.
• Federal representatives (including Lauren Hunt and Sam Pete/Ped from the U.S. Attorney’s Office).
• Twiggs’ attorney (Joel Catrill / Jill Catrell) was present during the second interview.
Portions of the recorded April 2026 statement were played during the preliminary hearing. Twiggs received use-immunity for his cooperation.
Candace Owens’ False Claims vs. Evidence
•Claim: Tyler Robinson never on UVU campus / was only a patsy handling clothes near Dairy Queen. Evidence: Surveillance video placed him on campus multiple times; DNA on rifle trigger/casings/towel; surrendered after mother’s identification.
•Claim: Lance Twiggs never questioned. Evidence: Interviewed twice (Sept 2025 & Apr 2026); recorded statements with immunity played in preliminary hearing.
•Claim: Texts, Discord messages, and note were fabricated by feds. Evidence: Introduced in court documents; corroborated by Twiggs’ statements; supported probable cause finding.
•Claim: Robinson did not kill Kirk / is innocent / did not fire the shot. Evidence: DNA on weapon, confession communications, rooftop surveillance, and behavioral evidence all link him directly.
•Claim: Dairy Queen photo shows him calm shortly after, disproving timeline. Evidence: Multi-camera campus footage and forensics independently place him at scene regardless of photo.
•Claim: TPUSA leadership betrayed Kirk or orchestrated/cover up the murder. Evidence: No evidence presented; charges and investigation focus solely on Robinson as lone actor.
•Claim: Foreign entities (Egyptian plane, Israel, French) involved in conspiracy. Evidence: No supporting evidence from investigation or court; case attributes act to Robinson alone.
•Claim: Trap door/underground escape used by shooter. Evidence: Surveillance shows suspect fleeing on foot from rooftop; no forensic support.
•Claim: Security personnel (e.g., Brian Harpole) helped plot/cover up murder. Evidence: No law enforcement findings; prompted defamation lawsuit against Owens.
•Claim: Texts written in archaic language (“1822”) indicating fabrication. Evidence: Messages presented in court; content consistent with modern confession/planning context.