So this is out now, revisiting the work of G.A. Cohen. It's edited by @MattPolProf and @JacobinBen and my chapter is on Cohen's defence of historical materialism, considering various criticisms from Robert Brenner, Vivek Chibber and various combinations of Wright, Levine & Sober.
New Cambridge Element, Wittgenstein and Skepticism by Andrea Kern, out now! Read for free for the next 2 weeks at
https://t.co/uphvrOsKuW
#cambridgeelements#philosophy
NAKS is now accepting submissions for the 2026 Wilfrid Sellars Junior Scholar Prize!
For more information and to submit your paper, visit our website!
https://t.co/rxLvoiX5fN
Ya está disponible la grabación de la última sesión del seminario online:
https://t.co/oq4gNHZD5x
Podéis ver todas las sesiones en nuestro canal:
https://t.co/ntpR9DxJ97
Gracias por la participación y el entusiasmo.
Tras el verano retomaremos y os avisaremos por aquí.
😎🤗🧠
📢 Está abierta la matrícula para la primera Escuela de Verano de la SICCS: “La cognición en el paradigma postcognitivista: teoría y métodos”, que se celebrará en Gandía del 1 al 3 de julio.
Modalidad presencial y online.
Más información e inscripción: https://t.co/PeAMdrKHIr
To understand Aristotle or Descartes or Kant isn't simply to know their positions, though that's a good start! It's to be able to explain their *reasons* for holding those positions: Why do they think they're true? What objections might you have and how do they handle it? 3/
“There is, in my view, no God in the traditional sense of the term. Equally the various metaphysical substitutes for God—Reason, Science, History—are false deities. Our destiny can be examined but it cannot be justified or totally explained. We are simply here.”
—Iris Murdoch
📢 Enhorabuena a nuestra compañera Ana Rosa López Rodríguez, Early-Career Scholar Prize de la European Society for Analytic Philosophy (ESAP) en el marco del 12th European Congress of Analytic Philosophy, por su trabajo “Nonmonotonicity as a critique of the ideal of neutrality”.
Robert Brandom sobre la concepción de la verdad como un proceso y no como un estado u objetivo final. La verdad es el continuo avanzar desde percepciones o juicios incompatibles hasta dar con imágenes y modelos cada vez más adecuados.