Creation week was real. The universe measured by science is ancient. Adam lived roughly 6,000 years ago. And the entire deep-time history described by science is a consequence of his Fall.
Fallen Earth Creationism proposes this sequence:
Original creation → Adam and Eve → Fall → fallen creation
After the Fall, Adam and Eve entered fallen creation roughly 6,000 years ago on its internal clock. That creation’s 13.8-billion-year past is real, including evolution, predation, extinction, and suffering, but it is causally downstream of the Fall.
That is FEC in its simplest form.
https://t.co/A8r9XV0VDh
I appreciate the engagement! Your astrophysical objection still places the Fall a few thousand years ago inside the 13.8-billion-year history. FEC does not. The Fall brought forth that entire fallen history.
Ancient photons really traveled for billions of years. Stars really formed at different times. The evolutionary record is genuine, and FEC has no need to deny that evolution occurred. Adam entered fallen creation at a recent point within its history. That history did not begin when he entered it. Therefore, there is no light-delay problem and no appearance-of-age claim.
FEC also proposes neither a second Earth running alongside ours nor a “magic portal.” Genesis says Adam and Eve were expelled from Eden. FEC claims that their Fall and expulsion were cosmic in scope without pretending to know the physical mechanism.
Your Neanderthal caricature assumes that Adam entered hundreds of thousands of years ago and that the image of God is anatomical. Neither is an FEC claim. Image-bearing cannot be reduced to body shape. Cain’s wife could have been a biologically modern evolved human without Adam having been made “in her image.”
Their compatibility also need not be an astonishing coincidence. If fallen creation was brought forth as the fallen counterpart of the original creation, its real natural history could be providentially ordered toward conditions capable of receiving Adam and Eve. Whatever human lineages existed then, humanity is now one. All fell through Adam, and redemption is offered through Christ.
Those are serious questions worth discussing. But “Q.E.D.” requires refuting the model itself, not a timeline and mechanism the model never proposed. You have not broken FEC.
As a Christian, I have no problem with Noah’s flood being regional. Fallen Earth Creationism neither depends upon a global flood nor uses it to explain the geological record. Your graphic therefore attacks a position I do not hold.
The literary question is separate. Similarities and chronological priority can establish a relationship between texts, but they do not automatically prove plagiarism. Your 2100 BCE date also conflates the early Sumerian Gilgamesh poems with the later Akkadian epic containing the flood episode, whose precursor is Atrahasis. Even if Genesis deliberately reworked Mesopotamian material, that could be theological polemic rather than plagiarism. One parallel narrative certainly does not establish that “the OT is plagiarized.”
You’re collapsing three different claims: no global flood, no historical flood of any scope, and Genesis plagiarized an earlier text. Your graphic argues only against a young-earth global-flood model, which I never defended. It proves neither of your other claims. Capital letters do not bridge those logical gaps.
@KurvaBlyat71898@Ghostbanned7@CreationMuseum I didn’t claim the flood happened or didn’t happen. I was responding to the idea that the Biblical flood narrative was derived from the Gilgamesh narrative.
Fallen Earth Creationism answers both without contradiction. Cain’s wife was an evolved human already living in fallen creation. Adam’s sin was not a mutation passed through DNA. The Fall brought forth the entire fallen order and its human history. All fell through Adam; all may be redeemed through Christ.
https://t.co/A8r9XV0VDh
Genesis says the Nephilim existed “also afterward,” and Numbers associates the post-Flood Anakim with them. If every human lineage outside Noah’s family was eliminated, where did the later Nephilim come from? The text permits several answers, but exclusive descent from Noah is not as effortless as it first appears.
@Ghostbanned7@KurvaBlyat71898@CreationMuseum Regardless of whether it happened, your claim could go the other way. Gilgamesh account is derived from an oral tradition that both the biblical flood and that account come from.
That contrast gets at the theological problem. The evolutionary record looks real, but its history is saturated with competition, predation, and extinction. FEC asks whether this is the history of fallen creation rather than the world God originally called very good.
https://t.co/A8r9XV0VDh
Yes. FEC takes this so seriously that it refuses to place deep-time death inside the world God called very good. The fossil record is real. Adam’s Fall did not make a young world look old. It brought forth a genuinely ancient fallen creation with death throughout its history. Christ will finally destroy death.
https://t.co/A8r9XV0VDh
Young-earth creationists see the brutality of evolution and say it never happened. Evolutionary creationists see that it happened and place it inside God’s very good creation. FEC holds both insights together: evolution happened, and its history of predation and extinction belongs to fallen creation.
https://t.co/A8r9XV0VDh
@KahuM90934@JoshuaBarzon Young-earth creationism protects God’s very good creation, but rejects deep time. Old-earth views accept deep time, but place predation, disease, and extinction inside that creation. Must Christians accept the tradeoff? FEC offers another possibility.
https://t.co/zGlCv5rlUs
@WeatherlyDarryl@DivinelyDesined Brother in Christ, I share your desire for skeptics to see the Creator. This issue need not divide us. Fallen Earth Creationism accepts the scientific record while retaining creation week, a historical Fall, and Christ’s restoration.
https://t.co/zGlCv5rlUs
@DivinelyDesined Complexity can point to intelligence without ruling out common descent. Lab cell reprogramming and the evolution of cell types are different questions. FEC does not need evolution to be false. If it occurred, it belongs to fallen creation’s real history.
https://t.co/zGlCv5rlUs
Cain feared other people. He found a wife. Cities appeared quickly. The sons of God married the daughters of men. Human lifespans collapsed. These are old puzzles. FEC gives them a single connected setting within the transition from original to fallen creation.
https://t.co/l2DF6Egpw5
Young-earth creationism protects the Fall by rejecting deep time. Old-earth creationism accepts deep time but places predation, disease, and extinction inside the creation God called very good. FEC asks whether Christians must accept either tradeoff.
https://t.co/zGlCv5rlUs
Fallen Earth Creationism says creation week and ancient history are not one physical history. The Fall brought forth the ancient fallen order science measures and displaced Adam and Eve into it. Christ restores humanity to the life for which we were made.
https://t.co/zGlCv5rlUs
Science records the real history of fallen creation. Creation week and the ancient cosmos are distinct histories. The Fall displaced Adam and Eve from the first into the second. Christ’s victory ensures this rupture will not be permanent. Fallen creation will be restored.
https://t.co/A8r9XV0VDh