@SizemoreSuzette @akafacehots I mean, she's half right. People who don't support Ukraine are pro-Putin, and those who are pro-Putin are against the interests of the United States. There are plenty of never-war liberals that get caught in the cartoon dog net as well.
@YaamsPa @IrSubterfuge @akafacehots It's a bunch of people who use cartoon dog avatars and jokes to mock Russian propagandists and misinformation about the UA-RF war. People mad about us are typically RF sympathizers and making traitors unhappy makes me happy.
@JuddLegum@davidhogg111@CommunityNotes Businesses have a right to serve or not serve who they please. Twitter, as a privately-owned business, has a right to enforce their ToS as they see fit. 1A does not give the right to speak on private platforms as one sees fit nor does it protect any speech from criticism.
rally for the nation in forming statewide militias, and against a corrupt government if need be. So arming Ukraine's citizens means doing what our Constitution allows us to do. We should support others having that same freedom of self-determination.
Hi! This is where I'll be doing more political commentary. Expect a lot of stuff on the UA - RF war, health misinformation, and discrediting faulty lines of reasoning from American politicians.
It's worth noting that I'm a gun-owning small-l libertarian, so a bunch of what I post will be attempts to counter narratives that involve increasing government power. I think the 2a position is consistent with supporting UA, as the original purpose was to allow citizens to-