@WolvesFan137@F1 On a permanent track and later in the race i would agree, but on lap 1 magnussen would have had to slam on the brakes to back out which is very dangerous with cars behind
@WolvesFan137@F1 Because perez seen him in his mirror then decided to squeeze him into the wall anyway. Completely his fault and he deserved a ban from f1 for it. Purposefully putting someone into the wall is disgusting, like hes done in the past with ocon, sirotkin and albon
@AndyCossick@IndyCar@detroitgp Unless a chasis has literally broken then its a matter of energy, not of structural integrity. Why not make road cars out of conrete to make them safer!!!
@DatBoyCanGolf69@IndyCarOnFOX Will buxton is very passionate, he clearly loves the sport i would much rather a comentator shout too much than not enough
@TheRealSt1g@cytrusf1 Exit of 3, 9, 10 and 19 are all kinks that are safe for cars with shallow impact angles. For bikes that doesnt work and is extremely dangerous
@RetiredJustin@F1BigData@wearetherace Doubtful, if they go through with this the cars would have roughly the same downforce as now, as development in a years time will be worth a lot!
@PaulMcG1992 The runoff is so big and just tarmac that there isnt any thrill to this corner. Get it wrong? no issue! you might just have a flat spot. The whole point of a 'great' corner is that it can go wrong and you have a big crash, but turn 8 doesnt have that
@HAL9000r@fia Whilst this is a tragic accident, it is rally. Spectators know the risk of standing close to a car with usually no barrier between them. You surely cant be suggesting miles of rally stages to be fully armco'ed off on public roads??
@F1 There we go finally, the first of surely many massive crashes that will be caused by sudden drops in energy from cars infront, very safe fia๐๐คก