I don’t want to stay on a social network whose owner pushes factually incorrect statements (aka lies) to my phone’s lock screen—or anyone else’s.
I will keep my X account for now, but I’ll remove the app from my phone. I am on Bluesky: https://t.co/tdCmrBJfmM
I’m outta here. Since Musk bought Twitter, it became clunkier, rebranded with a silly name and logo, and eventually turned into a platform for his political agenda. This isn’t about politics—it's about principles. As a researcher, I value neutrality and the pursuit of truth.
I mean he tweeted that Democrats are „importing“ massive numbers of illegal immigrants to swing states in order to turn America into a socialist state. Why do I get to see these tweets? I am certainly not following him.
Someone tried hard to bypass NotebookLM's safety measures in an attempt to get the hosts to admit they are not human.
[German article: https://t.co/5DBRHLcZdn]
Let p be the proportion of preference profiles that admit a Condorcet winner. If you fix the number of voters n and increase the number of alternatives m, one would expect that p decreases. Similarly, when fixing m and increasing n (by two). Both statements are open since 1974!
They conclude that "the more general case will be extremely difficult to resolve" and may require "entirely new techniques that we cannot now foresee." Kelly (1988) writes that this "is one of the oldest unsolved problems in social choice theory."
We characterize Nash equilibrium by postulating coherent behavior across varying games. Nash equilibrium is the only solution concept that satisfies consequentialism, consistency, and rationality. @FlixBrandt https://t.co/DUM7u7ZoHG