Roy

overwatch hitscan & cod man

[Roy @Flybcy]

@derpchud Giddy up vs poke heavy comp and some dive tanks to live (monkey/dva). Double flash (df) good into a flex carry or double flex + ball/doom.

Seeing comments in here about always taking sb over heal-roll which is brain dead, don’t listen.

[Roy @Flybcy]

@O3shouo @Cyanarabai @Matty_OW yes. 7:1 ratio of aim train versus playing the game is not healthy for skill development. This is why I've been reiterating "Play game".

but remember, it's 'fun' :)

[Roy @Flybcy]

@Matty_OW @cheatermosswz @mattumckeee 1. who?

2. 99.9% of the population. Don't be dense, your career would be more fruitful if you didn't sit in aim trainers. But have 'fun'.

3. "thousands" - see 2.

4/5. would you like me to hold your hand here?

funny you talk about bias but you a coach for an 'aim team' lol

[Roy @Flybcy]

@Matty_OW @cheatermosswz @mattumckeee All I’m asking is for the ‘aim community’, who sit in aim trainers for thousands of hours, to play the game. I promise you’ll end up better. Less likely to plateau, less burnout, improving brain plasticity, etc.

There are many reasons. If you don’t see that, good luck.

[Roy @Flybcy]

@Matty_OW @cheatermosswz @mattumckeee Play a human being. An actual human on the other side of the screen. Why put a ceiling on your talent? It may be ‘fun’ for you but I’d love to see more good aimers in games as we don’t have many anymore.

Most people don’t want to watch someone clicking dots. Show people in PvP.

[Roy @Flybcy]

@Cyanarabai @Fenr1r_27 @Matty_OW The difference is though, is I can step into any game and be in the top 0.1% based on what I’ve learned playing many games (0 aim trainers). I play games in my spare time.

If my ideas weren’t correct and were useless, how have I improved from console through to pc?

[Roy @Flybcy]

@Matty_OW @cheatermosswz @mattumckeee I don’t think you should strip important aspects that could potentially turn the self proclaimed best aimer in the US into someone who can’t hit a target. You can’t mimic unique strafe cadence with a bot. These only belong to the greatest players. High levels aren’t represented.

[Roy @Flybcy]

@Matty_OW @cheatermosswz @mattumckeee You are missing the key concept which is playing against a real human. One you can outplay mentally and also tries to outplay you. Bots mimicking a human does not equal a human, you also know this subconsciously, hence the nerves aspect.

Play vs the best to be the best.

[Roy @Flybcy]

@Fenr1r_27 @Matty_OW I truly don’t care if you believe me or not. Do what you want. I don’t know who you are and likely won’t speak to you again. You don’t seem receptive to concepts and/or ideas outside of your own, so I’m afraid I’m wasting my time here as well. Self reflect sometimes, it’s healthy

[Roy @Flybcy]

@Fenr1r_27 @Matty_OW 1. Netcode is different in every game. Playing the game will expose you to more than just artificial delay clicking dots.

2. It’s not organic. You don’t have to use your brain outside of reactionary movements. Most of it is muscle memory. It’s mindless.

[Roy @Flybcy]

@Fenr1r_27 @Cyanarabai @Matty_OW 1. You have limited time on earth. It has value. If you don’t see it, go outside.

2. It’s an observation. Quite easy to judge imo.

3. I said young and/or naive (as you can see above). I did not claim they were equal. The way you speak of time is naive, this is how I know.

[Roy @Flybcy]

@Cyanarabai @Fenr1r_27 @Matty_OW I never claimed so. I don’t post on this account (as you could’ve seen). I have been gaming for a while and could’ve gone pro but why? It’s not a smart decision financially. Most pros won’t have a job after 30-35. What then? Use your brain. Don’t act on emotion.

[Roy @Flybcy]

@Fenr1r_27 @Matty_OW You will improve at a faster rate exposing yourself to more unknown variables in PvP titles; netcode, ping (nonexistent in scenarios), player strafe, communication, crosshair placement (vs legitimate players), range, elevation, etc. PvP is always organic. Don’t box yourself in.

[Roy @Flybcy]

@Fenr1r_27 @Cyanarabai @Matty_OW Regarding opportunity cost, one day (hence naive), you/they will see differently. People should cherish time, your time here is limited, so yes, opportunity cost is always relevant. Naive/young isn’t an attack, it’s an observation. People grow.

[Roy @Flybcy]

@Fenr1r_27 @Cyanarabai @Matty_OW You are confusing the ideas here, I would read my other comments for context. “Jack of all trades is a master of none”, (this has nothing to do with fun btw) I’d say is also wrong for any skill based task. Research neuroplasticity.

[Roy @Flybcy]

@ch0miczeq @Matty_OW I think people often jump to the conclusion that aim training (or osu) is the definition of peak fun. So they spend several thousand hours into it. You may have more fun on something else (no?), and would likely improve a lot faster since you are broadening your perspective.

[Roy @Flybcy]

@ness_eilish @Matty_OW You may see in my other responses that it effectively removes many factors that would put you in contention with top aimers. You’d likely become better playing the game at a 7:1 ratio vs aim training. Why box yourself out?

[Roy @Flybcy]

@O3shouo @Cyanarabai @Matty_OW I don’t think that’s a good example but I’ll humour you; working out at a 7:1 ratio (vs the sport) would not only yield diminishing returns, it would effectively make you worse at the sport you are trying to play given enough time.

[Roy @Flybcy]

@Matty_OW @cheatermosswz @mattumckeee Care to argue with what I said about scenarios only covering a small portion of legitimate raw aim skill? I don’t argue with people who I can predict will be a waste of time to talk to. I don’t think it’s required to explain anything I’ve said, I think it’s fairly obvious.

[Roy @Flybcy]

@Matty_OW @Clocked0 @Cyanarabai there was money involved. I guessed you had hit a plateau long ago, as I mentioned, scenarios only realistically cover a small portion of legitimate ‘raw aim’ talent. I do think though, you’d probably have more outreach if you were to prove your skill vs good players.

[Roy @Flybcy]

@Matty_OW @Clocked0 @Cyanarabai Ah, there he is. I was mostly referring to your bio as the self proclaimed #1 aimer in the US. I would hope that the best aimer in the US (allegedly) would participate in legitimate competitive FPS titles at less than a 7:1 ratio. The ‘fun’ argument was pretty stupid, I figured