@mitchlafon Music doesn't matter.
Streaming is meaningless, the internet killed monoculture and music. More should've been done to jail pirates back then, publicly, with stiff penalties.
But the bag is open, and piracy essential due to erasure of physical media.
Music is now irrelevant.
@juukuchi I literally had this conversation yesterday. My friend said Carney was good for Canada,
I said, "How come?"
He said, "He stopped negotiating with Trump!" (Nevermind he promised he would to get elected!)
I said, "...How is that good?"
His reply? "TRUMP IS FACIST!"
Canada's crazy
@NBFansGermany 1. Rattle The Cage. Interesting guitar bits throughout, strong finish, excellent vocal
2.Bones For The Crows. Epic. Love the soaring stanzas and hard chorus, plus the end guitars, but the main solo is a muddled mess.
3. Leave Me Behind. Beats Dark Horse ballads, not ATRR ballads.
@LevineJonathan So what?
Nigger. Wetback. Jiggaboo. Porch Monkey.
Just saying the word means nothing. Saying it with hate makes the difference.
Anyone who is offended at my comment is fake offended and/or stupid enough to not get context or how words are supposed to work.
Context is king.
Every point Candace Owens made during the debate was incorrect. Her arguments were based on clear misunderstandings of the testimony, the legal rules, the science, and the evidence itself. This was not a matter of opinion or interpretation—she was simply wrong on the facts.
@OPMW04 Her supporters are even more retarded.
Here's the truth: if you cut Andrew out of the debate entirely, and only played Candace rambling for three hours, the only goal being for Candance to present enough evidence to make her "patsy" claim reasonable, she STILL looses.
@AnaKasparian ...But Ana implies Andrew "lost" because he couldn't quote the charges verbatim, essentially? By that standard, nobody could publicly say or defend the position that OJ Simpson murdered two people-even though we all know that's exactly what he did.
Ana is as retarded as Candace!
@AnaKasparian Candace was constantly pivoting, interrupting, stalling, while treating it as a chance to promote herself, profit, and restate her suspicions, while also altering them on the fly-all of which remain unsubstantiated by concreate evidence, and heavily reliant on faulty inference.
I find Candace guilty of pivoting, interrupting, and/or stalling the debate, while treating it more as a platform to restate her suspicions, or alter them on the fly, all of which remain unsubstantiated by concreate evidence, and heavily reliant on inference. @paleochristcon won.
@Friended4Ever I find Candace guilty of pivoting, interrupting, and/or stalling the debate, while treating it more as a platform to restate her suspicions, or alter them on the fly, all of which remain unsubstantiated by concreate evidence, and heavily reliant on inference.
A waste of 3 hours.