Most adults can not follow money or read congressional bills but vote. Most americans read at a 6th grade level but they claim to know history. Rome is burning.
Wolverine is desperately overdue for a comic-accurate adaptation. The mainstream media has spent decades commodifying a watered-down, hollow caricature of Logan that completely misses the mark.
The movie Logan is my only favorite. No disrespect to Huge personally. He just ain't it for me. I want the unstoppable canon ball of relentless furry lol
My apologies for misinterpreting your pfp then but my focus here isn't born from a lack of emotional control or being easily shaken by words on a screen. It comes from a desire to architect a sustainable community. This isn’t an emotional vulnerability issue—it’s a governance issue. Yes, the a.i censorship overreach is an issue but I also see no place, logic or reason for certain names that are completely devoid of dark humor or comedy.
Very few ppl can not distinguish between the 2. That's why in this current situation, the ppl wanting to name them selves odd names are the minority. Because the majority of humanity agrees. We dont need it or want. We're tired of the cycle it feeds.
Yup, & in reality we're all still going to log on & do our best to ignore them but ideas are the quietest architects of reality. People think the world is run by money & muscle, but those are just the heavy machinery. It’s philosophy that draws the blueprint so if we don't articulate with one another, we just become the hamster, never the wheel.
@benshapiro Im a republican. What israel did was a genocide by definition.
You are a zionist with the lowest lv of argumentative skills, how you ended up with a platform is a mystery... oh... wait... it's not... because you're a proxy agent.
I see what you defend & what you're willing to tolerate. that says a lot.
I bet the situation would be a lot different if it was at your door step. But luckily its a game right? It's not like these names dont often reflect the persons true feelings. Luckily it's just a game right?
So at what point should ppl be held accountable for projecting their ideologies onto a game world? So because its a game. Its ok for them to carry it over?
These are the reasons why the elitists own the world... at some point, humanity needs to evolve & stomp out evil in all aspects but that'll probably never happen because everything under the sun is vanity.
Fuck bluesky but you don't even know my side politically & you alrdy labeled me a left wing lunatic because im speaking facts about your minority party that hurt your feelings enough to put yourself here.
You cant make up the ignorance you ppl have. It's truly an arrested development. Do yourself a favor & go look at some call spreads. Arguing isn't your thing.
You are the minority, spin it as much as you want. You ppl are literally the lesser wanted here & no one in the free world wants your kind.
Idk how you sport rock lee with the mindset you carry. You obviously weren't paying attention during Naruto, if Lee was real. He'dkick your ass bro.
Its always ppl with honorable figures as a pfp standing behind bigotry.
Dark humor is a deliberate comedic tool used to cope with or to highlight tragedy. The behavior being defended by you minority is often just hostile, antisocial behavior masquerading as an "edgy joke" to evade accountability.
I love dark humor & dark comedy. I don't need to tolerate "KillNuggers". & I won't teach my children that.
Funny you got the pfp of a solider but lack the basic principles of one.
Have a good one "Zero Trust".
@asrrMDM@kalin_t Your fragile masculinity is showing which is only shadowed by your inability to argue.
You don't want to meet a real man. Stick to trump, you'll do better with the elitist pedophiles.
There is a massive difference between demanding a 'comfy bubble' & expecting basic civic decency.
No functioning society operates on the rule that you can say whatever toxic thing you want just because other people should 'cope better.' When a space becomes flooded with unmoderated bigotry, it doesn't foster 'resilience'—it just drives away reasonable people & turns the platform into a toxic echo chamber. Moderation isn't about protecting feelings; it's about protecting the viability of the community itself.
The irony in your ad hominem deflection is that identifying a false dichotomy & analyzing platform governance requires high-level recontextualization. Calling out systemic toxicity isn't a emotional breakdown; it’s an adult observation of how sustainable communities work. What you want is just a lazy way to avoid addressing the actual argument.
If your only solution to toxicity is telling everyone else to develop a thicker skin, you aren't being realistic, you're just excusing antisocial behavior.
Do better, grow up. You're smart but also manipulative & some of us are smart enough to see it.