Richard Fox

[Richard Fox @FoxFox34935]

@GovPritzker Coming from the Governor of a bankrupt state

[Richard Fox @FoxFox34935]

@GavinNewsom Gavin who? Oh the douche

[Richard Fox @FoxFox34935]

@RepTedLieu 🤣🤣🤣 Liu = Tool

[Richard Fox @FoxFox34935]

Congratulations, you’ve discovered that government contracts, loans, subsidies, and tax credits are four completely different things. Apparently, understanding the difference was too much work.

SpaceX gets paid to launch satellites and astronauts because it delivers services NASA and the military actually need. That’s a contract, not a handout. Tesla repaid its $465 million federal loan in 2013, nine years early, with interest.

And that $11 billion tax bill? Musk publicly reported approximately $11 billion in taxes for 2021 alone, one of the largest individual tax payments in American history.

You cherry-picked a single tax year, lumped legitimate government purchases together with subsidies, and conveniently ignored the jobs, factories, innovation, and economic activity these companies generated.

You brought a $38 billion headline to an argument that required basic financial literacy.

[Richard Fox @FoxFox34935]

@SenWarren Please retire.

[Richard Fox @FoxFox34935]

Tesla received government assistance. So did GM, Ford, and countless other American companies. The difference? Musk helped turn a struggling startup into the world’s most valuable automaker, built massive American factories, created tens of thousands of jobs, and helped revolutionize the auto industry.

And yes, Musk wasn’t one of Tesla’s two original founders. He joined in 2004, funded its early growth, and helped build it into a global powerhouse.

Taxpayer assistance didn’t design the cars, engineer the batteries, build the factories, or convince millions of customers to buy Teslas.

Claiming taxpayers deserve all the credit for Tesla’s success is like claiming the bank deserves credit for building your house because it financed the mortgage.

Government support is a legitimate subject for debate. Erasing entrepreneurship, engineering, execution, and financial risk to score political points is intellectual dishonesty.

[Richard Fox @FoxFox34935]

@CAgovernor Tough guy 🤣🤣🤣

[Richard Fox @FoxFox34935]

I love Canada and have tremendous respect for the Canadian people. But national pride shouldn’t require ignorance of the facts.

Universal healthcare? Yes, but Canadians also face significant specialist and surgical wait times. Affordable universities? Generally, yes, but Canadian taxpayers heavily subsidize them. Strict gun laws? Absolutely, but Canada still has gun violence. No death penalty? Correct—and 23 U.S. states have abolished it too. Generous parental leave? Yes, but much of it is paid at a fraction of regular wages.

And while we’re comparing countries, let’s not ignore Canada’s housing affordability crisis, strained healthcare system, productivity challenges, and dependence on the United States as its largest export market.

Canada is a wonderful country. So is America. Neither is perfect, and neither has a monopoly on decency, opportunity, or national pride.

You can love your country without insulting ours. And if your argument is that Americans should be more like Canadians, perhaps start by demonstrating the courtesy and respect you claim make Canada so special.

I respect Canada far too much to confuse your political arrogance with Canadian values.

[Richard Fox @FoxFox34935]

@RepJeffries Trust you? No thanks.

[Richard Fox @FoxFox34935]

@JoJoFromJerz @HaleyforMI Classy lady

[Richard Fox @FoxFox34935]

Imagine being this loud, this arrogant, and still missing the entire point. The filibuster isn’t about preventing majority rule—it’s about protecting the minority from unchecked political power. Abolishing it means whichever party controls 51 Senate votes can ram through legislation with virtually no bipartisan support. That’s not automatically tyranny, but it certainly eliminates an important safeguard. And here’s the irony: the moment Republicans regain control, Democrats will suddenly rediscover why that safeguard mattered. Screaming obscenities doesn’t make you intellectually superior. It just makes your ignorance louder.

[Richard Fox @FoxFox34935]

What an embarrassingly ignorant take. Musk founded SpaceX from scratch, helped turn Tesla from a fledgling startup into the world’s most valuable automaker, and transformed Twitter into X. NASA didn’t hand him reusable rockets—SpaceX engineers revolutionized the economics of spaceflight. And calling a man with degrees in physics and economics a “college dropout” is spectacularly stupid. You don’t have to like Musk, but pretending he hasn’t accomplished anything only advertises your own ignorance.

[Richard Fox @FoxFox34935]

Imagine being so intellectually bankrupt that your entire argument consists of posting a picture and screaming “trash.” No facts. No substance. No intelligent criticism. Just a tantrum masquerading as political commentary. You don’t have to like Elon Musk, but at least develop an argument before embarrassing yourself in public.

[Richard Fox @FoxFox34935]

What an absolutely disgraceful display of intellectual dishonesty. You accuse a man of mass murder and racism without presenting a shred of evidence to substantiate either charge. Hundreds of thousands of deaths? Prove it. Racism? Show the evidence. Your hatred of Elon Musk isn’t proof of anything. It’s just hatred masquerading as moral superiority. Reckless accusations, inflammatory rhetoric, and zero accountability. Pathetic.

[Richard Fox @FoxFox34935]

This is what passes for congressional leadership? A profanity-laced, juvenile meltdown filled with personal insults, wild accusations, and threats of imprisonment without a shred of evidence.

You want to investigate Elon Musk? Then present credible evidence and follow the law. That’s how accountability works in a constitutional republic—not through political vendettas and public tantrums.

The irony of someone claiming to defend democracy while fantasizing about imprisoning a political adversary is staggering.

Musk has built companies that revolutionized electric vehicles, space exploration, and satellite communications. You don’t have to like him or agree with his politics to recognize those accomplishments.

Meanwhile, your contribution to the national conversation is a string of obscenities and unsubstantiated accusations.

If this is your idea of congressional temperament, you’ve made a far stronger case against your own candidacy than anything you’ve said about Elon Musk.

Public office requires judgment, discipline, and character. This post demonstrates a remarkable absence of all three.

[Richard Fox @FoxFox34935]

Before celebrating, perhaps check the facts. Canada has not demonstrated that it can simply eliminate every Starlink relationship, and a political announcement is not the same as a nationwide cancellation. SpaceX operates globally, with government, commercial, and consumer customers far beyond Canada.

And claiming this will cost SpaceX “hundreds of millions” without providing a single contract value or financial calculation? That’s not analysis. That’s wishful thinking dressed up as news.

Disliking Elon Musk doesn’t magically make misinformation true.

[Richard Fox @FoxFox34935]

@ChrisMurphyCT Double douche

[Richard Fox @FoxFox34935]

James, that’s quite an accusation. Which senator was purchased? How much did they cost? Where’s your evidence?

Political donations are legal. Bribery is not. If you have evidence of corruption, produce it. Otherwise, you’re simply dressing up political resentment as a criminal accusation.

You don’t get to declare someone corrupt just because you dislike the billionaire supporting them.

For someone seeking public office, understanding the difference between an allegation and actual evidence shouldn’t be this difficult.

[Richard Fox @FoxFox34935]

Interesting résumé, Abdul. But voters deserve the complete story, not just the campaign highlights.

You call yourself a doctor, which is technically accurate. What you leave out is that you never completed a medical residency and have never been licensed to practice medicine.

You tout eliminating medical debt, yet your campaign previously claimed $700 MILLION had been erased. Independent reporting found that the actual amount was just over $95 million as of September 2026. That’s meaningful progress, but it’s nowhere near the figure your campaign advertised.

And while you deserve credit for helping children receive eyeglasses, voters should also ask for measurable results from your claims about fighting polluters and eliminating lead exposure.

There’s nothing wrong with celebrating genuine accomplishments. There is something wrong with presenting ambitious goals as completed achievements.

Michigan voters deserve results, transparency, and accountability—not a carefully edited résumé wrapped in political slogans.

[Richard Fox @FoxFox34935]

Ronald, congratulations on turning a satellite financing announcement into a political fairy tale.

Telesat Lightspeed and Starlink are fundamentally different satellite systems serving different markets. Canada’s support for Telesat isn’t automatically the cancellation of Starlink, and investing in a domestic aerospace company isn’t evidence that Musk was fired or taught a lesson.

And here’s the part you conveniently ignore: Starlink is an operational global network, while Telesat Lightspeed is still being deployed. Announcing billions in financing doesn’t magically put satellites into orbit or connect customers.

If Carney actually terminated a federal Starlink contract and replaced it with Telesat, produce the contract, the cancellation notice, and the announcement.

Otherwise, you’re not reporting a victory. You’re celebrating a narrative you haven’t bothered to verify.

Political cheerleading isn’t fact-checking.