FrankieJTips

i like stuff. and Ohio. and stuff and hills. Click the bell 🔔 for notis.

[FrankieJTips @FrankieJTips]

@FrankzLocks How many days before you start charging. We all know the end goal here.

[FrankieJTips @FrankieJTips]

Getting ready to leave for the Food City 300 at Bristol and I was deciding if I should take my fanny pack from Bonnaroo.

Who is going to tell my wife I found a 3 or 4 year old tab of acid and I will now be watching the race on a different frequency. 😃

[FrankieJTips @FrankieJTips]

@Rob_Shenanigans

[FrankieJTips @FrankieJTips]

@TW_trades_ It costs nothing to follow me. But I'll show you my butthole for $20. GTFO of here.

[FrankieJTips @FrankieJTips]

@MikeHarris1973 @3mJamal @ericjackson I’ll stick to the data in the filings. You can stick to the nicknames. The market doesn't care about either, but it definitely cares about the dilution mechanics we're seeing in the prospectus

[FrankieJTips @FrankieJTips]

@3mJamal I’ve been watching $SRXH due to the attention @ericjackson brought to it. I see you’re educating others on the risks. I put together a deep dive into the "machine" behind this ticker—thought you’d find this breakdown interesting. 🧵

[FrankieJTips @FrankieJTips]

5/ Claiming "they can't print shares in the dark" ignores how these registered offerings function. SEC filings disclose the potential for dilution, but the timing of when those shares hit the tape remains opaque to retail. That is the risk. $SRXH

[FrankieJTips @FrankieJTips]

It’s easy to throw around insults, but if you're going to attempt a ‘debunk,’ you should at least get the facts from the actual filings. Let’s correct the record on $SRXH.

[Qwami B @ThaRealGoatQwam]

$SRXH looks like we got TEMU Jamal here here now so I expect nothing less

1. SRXH controls whether to use the ELOC. The agreement says the company has the right, but not obligation to sell shares; Keystone has NO right to force sales.

2. They can’t print shares quietly in the dark idiot. That’s nonsense. This is literally disclosed through SEC filings, prospectus supplements, registration statements, and purchase agreements.

3. A reverse split raises the price per share and lowers the share count by the same ratio. The filing says the 1-for-60 split affects all holders uniformly and does not change ownership percentage except fractional rounding. Market cap doesn’t magically rise because of a reverse split idiot.

4. Reverse split was part of a trick is a dumb take. The actual filing says NYSE American had flagged them for low price, halted trading, and the reverse split was to regain compliance.

5. Having market cap incentives creates a risk of hype, yes. But it does not prove they are manipulating the stock or printing shares just to trigger bonuses. Also, dilution alone does not guarantee a higher market cap because the market can lower the stock price stupid.

6. calling it paper trade fake ignores the disclosure, which says trades were forward looking, emailed in advance, marked to actual prices, net of broker costs, and not a backtest.

7. A late day spike can happen from shorts covering, low float, closing auctions, buy imbalance, retail buying, market makers hedging, or actual manipulation.

Questions?

[FrankieJTips @FrankieJTips]

4/ ou're lecturing on basic math, but ignoring the reality of the "death spiral." While a split doesn't change ownership percentages, the structural risk is that companies like this often end up right back where they started: low price, low equity, and more dilution.

[FrankieJTips @FrankieJTips]

@TheEXECUTlONER_ I went to my first Whataburger a few weeks ago and got two meals with fries. They gave me onion rings and the cashier told me I would have to pay extra for fries if I wanted them even though they got the order wrong.😂

Burger was mid. Wait was insane. Nah.

[FrankieJTips @FrankieJTips]

@ni29219 @LaurasBlue @jameskvnn @ericjackson @gnoble79 It did go through the split. It's updated in the Prospectus Supplement. Still does not defeat the original premise. It only makes the bleed slower.

[FrankieJTips @FrankieJTips]

@LaurasBlue @jameskvnn @ericjackson @gnoble79 That 4.99% cap isn’t a safety net—it’s just an ownership blocker. Once they sell enough to dip below, they reload and continue. It’s not a pump-and-dump; it’s a 'death spiral' volume grind. You get a stair-step descent and sawtooth action as they systematically drip-feed supply.

[FrankieJTips @FrankieJTips]

@LaurasBlue @jameskvnn @ericjackson @gnoble79 Fair point on the split-adjusted math. You're right, 2.5B is the pre-split figure. Even at ~41M, massive dilution remains the core risk. The mechanism changed, but the threat of $100M+ in supply hitting the float is why I'm cautious. Glad we agree on the risk.

[FrankieJTips @FrankieJTips]

@3mJamal @ericjackson 11/ Final thought: This is musical chairs. The financier takes their spread, the execs hit bonuses via share printing, and the retail trader is left holding the bag. Don't trade the "story." Read filings, watch share counts, and protect your capital.

[FrankieJTips @FrankieJTips]

@3mJamal @ericjackson 10/ Painting the Tape: Watch the chart. It drifts lower all day, then spikes in the last 15 mins to close green. This tricks retail into thinking there's organic demand, luring them into a mirage of strength.