@NanoScouts "moids kill their moms more" ? is that what ur stat shows? is it more than statistical literacy and just straight-up literacy? anyways 47-53 is likely not even significant enough to reach any conclusions. But the difference for the women/female murderers likely is
its wild this person doesn't have the statistical literacy/common sense to realise this strengthens the other person's argument more than it helps hers.
@FaWenger@Chuxandrew31@hisuuk South Koreans are respected as high IQ with a functional home base (country) which is enough to earn respect. When ppl think South Koreans the ability to dominate doesnt come to mind first. But the highly developed nature of SK does
@FaWenger@Chuxandrew31@hisuuk disagree, when ppl talk racism online for eg they often default to how many functional societies you've built. Paki*tan has nuclear weapons but no one cares cause they feel the country is backwards. It just so happens that functional societies correlate with the ability to damage
@FaWenger@Chuxandrew31@hisuuk tbh u dont need to go that far. You just need one majority-black country that is objectively wealthy mainly through internal efforts in non-extractive/rent-seeker industries to gain social currency.
@BrayForJade this also doesnt work, insurance for eg is linked to real world inflationary costs, think rebuilding costs (labour and material) and increasing climate risks
on the contrary i find this more endearing/the opposite of cringe, when you cant tell where each of their pieces are gonna be from. H&M, mixed with shien then random designer etc etc, its like..they just buy whatever they like and don't care
@therealjobella ahh i get you now. Only you truly know your situation, all i will say is that far more often than not its a tracking issue more than a metabolic one, hence y some ppl in this thread are skeptical. Find out ur maintenance rate and what u actually eat to rule it out.
@JooseButter@AkademiksTV i realise ppl struggle with abstraction. God and Black ppl are the least important parts of the logic AK puts forward. If your words can infer respect, or the lack of, to a particular thing (be it a God), then by definition, it has meaning.
The # of ppl without monologues isn't even that high. The quoted 30-50% figure is misattributed. My theory is that mid-twits wanting to feel better than they are jump onto any stat that makes them feel they are closer to the right tail of the distribution than they actually are.
When this is asked, always mid IQ ppl in the replies and qts with some "deep" dumb over-analysis involving no inner monologue or some garbage. When the simple answer is far away from fam + monotonous job, allowing for multitasking+ long work hours, and hence no time otherwise.
@cremieuxrecueil People with no inner monologue have to fill the void with something. In many cases it's literally sitting there on a phonecall barely talking. Or overly loud music.
Average IQ in Bangladesh is even lower than india!
Essentially, its the revealed preference of BW watchers mixed with balancing the preference of your core audience in an attempt to scale. If black ppl had more economic power, then u could prob have two black leads in a Disney movie that could still scale...but..yeh
So many things at play. Disney has to do scale. A BM love interest isn't as marketable in this case. With a WM, you retain plenty of your black girl audience (some don't care and some love the fantasy) while not alienating your other female audience who prefer a WM interest.
@Evaien5@go_diego_go34 lol this assumes the nerds arent the ones that feel this way most of the time. For the most part, it seems the "alpha" is usually fine that he had the best of times, even if those days are ending. Just my observation
the avg guy gets no play at all, especially if hes not providing resources. Being the disposable guy that doesn't lead with resources is statistically harder, hence why men dont take as much offence to it (as long as they still get sex).
all this tells me is that "red pill" runs laps around these women...THEY KNOW all of this already, they WANT to be that disposable guy, they get a greater self-esteem boost from being that disposable guy, you aren't stripping them of anything.
men see sex with a women as a near divine gift that is an affirmation of their very being. the ultimate approval of nature's cruel god.
rfh's tweet triggers everyone bc she rips away the affirmation a man has assumed for himself. sorry chuds, you were disposable after all
she exposes the manosphere delusion that sex for a man is just sex... you got your pleasure, why do you care? ...it's the cognitive dissonance of two contradictory beliefs held in tension, men pretend sex is merely for physical pleasure but also see sex as metaphysical affirmation of their existence...
@hollowearthterf only issue is, they optimize for being that guy through "game" and being an ass, when its really just genetic (be good looking) while being an ass/emotionally unavailable.
@hollowearthterf agree overall, but the idea that men dont know this is getting more wrong each day. Id argue this fact is a key pillar in "red pill" ideology and being that disposable guy that gets sex without trading commitment is a desirable outcome theyd optimize for...if they could.