@0xalpharush@dystopiabreaker@llllvvuu I think there was a bug with wormhole's solana smart contracts allowing the attacker to mint spl whEth. Attacker then sent the whEth over the bridge and the bridge correctly processed and gave the attacker Eth
@llllvvuu@dystopiabreaker No, I think a bug with wormhole's solana smart contracts allowing the attacker to mint spl whEth. Attacker then sent the whEth over the bridge and the bridge correctly processed and gave the attacker Eth
@cryptogonzo_ Not saying the current version is good but it's not the final result. I believe there are another ~5-10x worth of optimizations they can do without base layer changes. They opted to release sooner with a partially optimized rollup which is reasonable imo.
@0xdoug Not just about mandates, it's also tricky to align incentives with one-off asymmetric ideas like this. e.g. maybe a quant can come up with a simple nft strategy that's 80% to look really stupid and 20% to 10x but I imagine it's -EV for the average quant to push for it
@l2beatcom@jadler0@fuellabs_ The former just assumes a single rollup node is honest (and that the l1 validators won't censor) right? Whether that's a reasonable decentralization/throughput tradeoff is a fair question, but to me it at least seems clearly different from a high gas limit l1.
@l2beatcom@jadler0@fuellabs_@jadler0 enjoyed the talk but I didn't understand the equivalence you drew between a high gas limit ORU on a low gas limit l1 and a high gas l1 in terms of decentralization