🚨BREAKING: In Chicago, ICE agents were caught on video assaulting a local chaplain for filming, and asking questions, about what was happening on her own street… AFTER the arrest was already made.
In the video, Alley Henny, a Black chaplain, is standing with her back against a parked car while recording.
An ICE agent is already pushing her backward as she simply asks:
“What did he do?”
But here’s what makes this situation even more disturbing…
The man had already been detained… He was already INSIDE the ICE vehicle.
The arrest was over.
That means, there was no active arrest taking place for her to “interfere with.”
Yet, multiple agents surrounded her anyway.
One agent yells, “Get back! We have a warrant for his arrest. Get out of here.”
She responds, “This is my neighborhood.”
The agent’s response?
“I don’t care.”
Then, while she’s already backed against a car, and surrounded by TWO agents… a THIRD agent rushes over, grabs her, and forcefully shoves her down the street while screaming, “GET BACK! I ALREADY TOLD YOU ONCE!”
And just to be clear…
She wasn’t stopping an arrest.
She wasn’t obstructing agents from reaching a suspect.
She wasn’t preventing agents from taking someone into custody.
The suspect was ALREADY IN THE VEHICLE.
So, this entire situation raises serious concerns about excessive force and retaliation against protected speech.
Because once the situation is already controlled, there’s no reason for that level of force against someone who’s just recording and asking questions.
And if that kind of response isn’t checked, and held accountable, it starts to send a very dangerous message…
That recording and questioning government actions can be met with physical violence, and intimidation.
And that’s exactly what the constitution is meant to prevent.
🚨BREAKING: A U.S. citizen was riding his bike in Laredo, Texas… when Border Patrol agents pulled alongside him and illegally tried to block him in.
When he kept riding, they chased him down, physically grabbed him by the arm, and immediately started demanding identification and asking where he was from.
He told them he born in Laredo, Texas.
But that was not good enough.
The agent asked, “What high school did you go to?”
He answered that, too… and they still kept demanding ID, over and over again.
The Fourth Amendment exists for a reason. In America, law enforcement don’t get to randomly stop people, physically grab them, and demand identification because they feel like it.
Being on a bike isn’t a crime.
You also don’t have to carry an ID on you unless you are operating a motor vehicle… which he was not.
So, demanding an ID, without probable cause, is illegal.
And the cherry on top? When the man went to use his phone, an agent tried to stop him by grabbing it… apparently unaware the entire encounter was already being recorded by his glasses.
If Border Patrol can stop an American born citizen riding his bike, demand his papers, and put their hands on him without stating a lawful reason… every American should be paying attention.
If the White House UFC was for Freedom 250 ( and wasn't a money making scheme ) it would be FREE for every American to watch.
Not just Paramount+ subscribers
High Treason Convictions
In January, an Estonian court sentenced pro-Russian politicians to prison terms for high treason. One of the leaders of the pro-Russian party Koos, Aivo Peterson, was sentenced to 14 years in prison, while Dmitry Rootsi and Russian citizen Andrei Andronov received 11 years. Peterson and Rootsi were found guilty of high treason, while Andronov was convicted of participating in non-violent activities against Estonia.
According to DW Russian, “the court found it proven that Peterson and Rootsi maintained contact with Russian authorities, discussed political cooperation and the creation of a party capable of changing Estonia’s political course. This could have given Russia the opportunity to covertly influence Estonian politics in the future, the court decision states. In addition, Andrei Andronov was involved in organizing press tours to territories of Ukraine occupied by Russia, while Peterson participated in trips and the creation of propaganda materials aimed, in particular, at weakening support for Ukraine in Estonia.”
So, let’s unpack that a bit: Estonia prosecutes Russian subcontractors, because the country understands that they represent a threat not only to national security but its very ability to remain a sovereign nation.
This is important because in the US, we know that Elon Musk communicated with Vladimir Putin in the run up to the 2024 election. We also know that Musk communicated with the Russian agent tasked with running operations to infiltrate Western media. Musk himself operated as a Russian subcontractor in advance of the 2024 election, just as the Congressional representative, Anna Paulina Luna is doing, as she whitewashes Russian war crimes, something that in Estonia could earn her a prison sentence.
Recall how Trump invited Putin on American soil to whitewash his crimes, and then launched an illegal war, which benefits Putin in myriad ways, all this a direct challenge to what remains of international law.
Such acts of out and out treason could never have happened in a place like Estonia, because democracy’s heart is still healthy.
Estonia’s former prime minister, Kaja Kallas, is among the true leaders of the free world.
9/
Paul Manafort was just in Albania.
Steve Bannon is taking aim at Ireland.
Donald Trump is taking aim at the whole of Europe by starting wars that benefit Putin, and back European leaders into a corner.
3/
Estonia Knows How to Prosecute Treason
I will continue reporting the ways Estonia defends itself from Russian threats until people finally see pro-Russian agitators who pose as patriots in the West as criminal traitors to their countries
https://t.co/qsz5040k80
This is how Pizzagate and QAnon work.
This kind of lie weaponizes the deepest part of any normal person’s amygdala—the instinct to protect children. It generates trauma which gets attached to the object of the lie. It’s psychological warfare. It’s perverse.
@nypost When you or your friend got 86'd from a restaurant, did you fear that restaurant staff were going to inflict bodily harm? No - why not? Because that's not what it means.