Bianca Menolotto 🦘🌙

Dominance hierarchies are hard to change. Radical feminist analysis. Biological definitions in law is very Project 2025 #GCmyths #AusRWGCs #TheshitSallsays

[Bianca Menolotto 🦘🌙 @Funfems]

For the Nazis on twitter who haven’t figured out they’re Nazis or Nazi sympathisers yet.
Checklist for the Nazi numpties ✅

[Piyush Mittal 🇺🇸🇺🇦🟧🌊🌈 @piyushmittal]

Is your country fascist? A checklist …

[Bianca Menolotto 🦘🌙 @Funfems]

@RachaelWongAus @__Passie__ Move back there Rachel. ❤️❤️❤️

[Bianca Menolotto 🦘🌙 @Funfems]

@ClipperKing0z45 Enjoy your protest full of moderates 🤡

[Bianca Menolotto 🦘🌙 @Funfems]

The names on the poster reminds me of lineup to a really bad bar joke.

A grifter, a racist, a horse doctor and a show pony all walk into a bar.

Fuck, what a trainwreck.

[David Milner @DaveMilbo]

This is a new classic of the 'twisting reality on its head and shitting brainworms into an entire population' genre. Chris Uhlmann is the idiot's idiot

[Bianca Menolotto 🦘🌙 @Funfems]

But at least your crowd funder pays your bills.

[Bun @themamabun]

Friendly reminder that Giggle was a failing app that was approximately $600k in the hole at the time that serious security flaws were discovered. One could argue that a crowdfunded court case necessitating pulling the app and a new career as a GC podcaster might be a bit of a lifeline to someone in a situation where they could hypothetically have been sued for damages by eg a class action suit in the foreseeable future.

[Bianca Menolotto 🦘🌙 @Funfems]

Sall, you can’t run your business because it was never profitable.

#TheshitSallsays

[Bun @themamabun]

This case was legally a nothing burger that has been vastly misrepresented by the interest groups behind it. There were ways that the giggle app could have structured its business to achieve its aim, but never bothered. Additionally, In Australia, changing sex markers comes under acts such as the Passports Act, so a case of discrimination under the Sex Discrimination Act must accept the premise that someone legally identified as a woman under those other acts is a woman. The judgement took great pains to discuss that. Changing the SDA to include a definition of female as only biological women does not change trans women’s legal right to change sex markers. You would have to repeal those other acts. Unfortunately, you’ve been lied to by the media.

[Kylie Maree @socfemoz]

@jillcb7 The ACL drafts an amendment bill for the SDA, but "whatevs, sounds good, sex is biological"

[Kylie Maree @socfemoz]

@dusty_smokey The bill specifically proposes to insert a definition of 'sex'
In the history of the SDA, s4 has never listed 'sex', so the changes are not to 'reintroduce'; they are completely new.

[Kylie Maree @socfemoz]

@dusty_smokey It's not hair-splitting.
The SDA has never had a definition of sex in all of its history that qualified 'woman' and 'man'

[Bianca Menolotto 🦘🌙 @Funfems]

@ClipperKing0z45 Just a normal single mother who can sniff out bullshit.

[Kylie Maree @socfemoz]

@gregsouthby @dusty_smokey "These people" are the ACL.
Susan Ryan certainly didn't argue for women to be defined by their biology. The problem addressed by the drafters of the SDA was 'gender'
Hence no definition of 'sex' in the SDA.

[White Rose Society (Australia) @WhiteRoseSocAU]

We've been quiet but busy. Last year we heard that a rich backer had bought the NSN a compound and set about finding where it was. This story we worked on with @Sherryn_G is the result of that investigation. https://t.co/2mEIgMNj6Q

[Bonnie Allan @bonnieallan72]

‘Rich mates, secret mansions: Australia’s millionaire Nazi-backers revealed’ Concerning update on backing of the NSN.

[coffeeman @coffeeman_tc]

@JmarrMarr What he doesn't muck up...How anyone would want to drop their strides for him...🤷‍♂️

[Kylie Maree @socfemoz]

Unless you support the political agenda of male supremacy, don't support biological definitions of 'sex' in law.
For the same reason that you wouldn't let white supremacists deceive you into believing that biologically defining 'race' would benefit black and brown people.

[Kylie Maree @socfemoz]

These people want a biological definition of 'sex' because they're male supremacists.

The same people want a biological definition of 'race' because they're white supremacists.

[Scott Koopman @caringkiwi]

@mattjcan If it’s not a culture war, then why did the Australian Christian Lobby write your bill? 🤷🏼‍♂️

[Scott Koopman @caringkiwi]

So my account got hacked, I’m not convinced it was not targeted. I’ve tried for several weeks to get X to restore my profile, with no success. If any of my old followers see this, please refollow me and amplify if you can. ❤️ 🏳️‍🌈

[Bianca Menolotto 🦘🌙 @Funfems]

We’ve never defined race in law and the same reason is why we’ve never defined sex in law.
👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇👇

[Kylie Maree @socfemoz]

@EssencePetunia @Ozwimmsrights There are several reasons but mainly for the same reason we don't define 'race' in the RDA.

Sex discrimination does not occur because actual differences, real or perceived, exist.

Sex discrimination law's primary concern is with addressing sexist beliefs about differences.