Oroboros' ref sheet is finished! (18+, NSFW)
Thank you for being so diligent and easy to work with. Your character looks incredible and it was an honor to help you bring him to life.
Would you like to buy art, or join us as an artist? https://t.co/vS7Jok4POV
#furryart#furry
@Emerald_Valor In the ToS, we explicitly provide full license to both the artist and commissioner to fully use, reproduce and create derivative works, so no, that wouldn't be possible because permission was clearly granted in the ToS. That would be a very strange thing to want to do anyway.
@Emerald_Valor I'm sorry, could you please rephrase your question? Are you asking could we make DMCA claims on the behalf of the artist/commissioner if someone else tried to use their art without permission?
@Wyrd_Oh@TojoTheThief Yeah, that's not unintentional! We are very small and were lucky enough to get a partnership deal with them in exchange for promoting them. We don't really have any sizable social media to speak of of our own. Maybe we will in the future.
@ExurgentAD @TojoTheThief I don't have much money at the moment to spend on Google AdSense or Twitter sponsored links, so we are grateful for the partnership.
We have 20 artists who signed up since launch and that's more than I can find work for already.
Thank you for taking the time to reply.
@iminsert If there is a different way that we can protect both the artist and commissioner, I can speak with the legal expert who wrote this about changing it. We're still new, things can easily still change if they need to.
https://t.co/oXrRiOk8Uw
@TojoTheThief Thank you for your question!
That clause is there solely as a defense against unjust DMCA claims to protect both the artist and commissioner. By retaining copyright, we can legally dictate that both parties have equal rights to the piece.
@LaniOtter@TojoTheThief Thank you, I don't think I understand what you mean though. We want to make sure that both artists and commissioners have equal ability to use the pieces that are produced. Doesn't this achieve that, instead of the artist having ultimate control over the commissioner's rights?
@Wyrd_Oh@TojoTheThief Yeah, that's not unintentional! We are very small and were lucky enough to get a partnership deal with them in exchange for promoting them. We don't really have any sizable social media to speak of of our own. Maybe we will in the future.
@TojoTheThief Thank you for your question!
That clause is there solely as a defense against unjust DMCA claims to protect both the artist and commissioner. By retaining copyright, we can legally dictate that both parties have equal rights to the piece.
@TojoTheThief Hopefully, it will never be required. It's just simple prophylaxis to mitigate a potential large headache later if an artist and commissioner get upset with one another. We can make sure that neither party has to miss out in that case.
@TojoTheThief Thank you for your question!
That clause is there solely as a defense against unjust DMCA claims to protect both the artist and commissioner. By retaining copyright, we can legally dictate that both parties have equal rights to the piece.
We've officially launched!
Artists and commissioners - we've got you!
Furry Art Pro - Your One-Stop Commission Shop!
https://t.co/vS7Jok4POV #furry#furryart