@Mikeedakid1 Andrew lives on a royal estate and therefore is protected. Steps foot off the land and doesn’t. Harry comes to the UK and stays in palace grounds and is protected. Steps off and swans about, so doesn’t. Can have protection if he provides 28 days notice but not to merch of the RF
@ThatTimWalker Bull shite. Taylor swift had a terrorist threat against her. Harry hasn’t, is protected in the riyal grounds and can have protection with 28 days notice. Why should the taxpayer fund him? The armed police are not for rent
@chrisshipitv Stop telling porkies Ship-I’m-on-the-Harkles-payroll. Swift has actual threats - Harkles have protection on the palace grounds and can have it with 28days notice and a full itinerary. Why should the taxpayer give them the protection they want by being non-working royals
@EnglishRose543@RoyalFamily@KensingtonRoyal There are just playing the will they won’t they to stay relevant. It’s always been the case they can stay in one of the palace properties - nothings changed, they’re just making out it’s something bigger. Let’s see
@piersmorgan It’s disgusting - but aren’t they being prosecuted and have been named as we speak? And the victim hasn’t been told she was “asking for it?’ No, so this is not the same!