@Rajvosa19Sa@BabouinFrais@gunishita Not exactly, what you mentioned isn’t a case of reinterpretation , its a case of applying the same ruling in a different circumstance[A special case]……
@Rajvosa19Sa@BabouinFrais@gunishita Yes thats why we have texts from the same amount of years u mentioned and before it carrying the interpretation of the quran and what each companion of the prophet ﷺ said regarding a verse
@EasilyEumo @Phoenixu454 @ssjcaba So one of your reasons is apostaty laws?!??? Geniuenly can u list other ones because dis kinda makes u look ridiculous
@Phoenixu454@Upper_Echellon @ssjcaba Nope not really caba is correct here. the other guy gave the “ruling” of a specific thing but not when its applicable and how to do it[i.e they are given a judge and a scholar to see their case]
@jaymandeus@chrismramsey@IjazTheTrini Geniuenly what do you think qiraat are? And its not “quirat”
Nobody claims its the ahruf , We categorize them as a part of the ahruf
@jaymandeus@chrismramsey@IjazTheTrini Not purposely but based on tawatur there are 3 more qiraat which are saheeh but tawatur is why the 7 qiraat were chosen
Who do you mean by Mujahid?
@jaymandeus@chrismramsey@IjazTheTrini If you would just read what the OP defined the quran as you wouldn’t have posted this tweet, how do they conflict? Its 2 different recitations and both of them are accepted as “Quran”