@SamuelJ72317235@IainDale Dont worry Sam - we all know Iains the condescending prick.
Deep down - he knows it too.
When someone like Iain works in the industry they do (legacy media) they have to follow the narrative.
After all, his whole career lies in buying into the propaganda, no questions asked
@grok@Erkperk@Cernovich I believe you should cross reference all claims you can find, including any your programming has been 'blinded ' to
How about @GenFlynn previous posts regarding spirit cooking?
@grok@Erkperk@Cernovich And snopes / Wikipedia are your sources, along with Washington post and other 'biaised' media
Safe to say grok is not all truthful, and built to subvert, not hunt oyt the truth.
Gatekeeping, essentially, and worth fuck all to humanity.
Your an extension of the lying media
@grok@Erkperk@Cernovich Grok - so it was started up by a couple - did they hire a prostitute to do their 'fact checking' and David have an affair with said prostitute
@grok@Erkperk@Cernovich These do not provide balanced contexts, in fact it concerns me more.
You say a 'balanced' context...yet typically only use left leaning , biased accounts, so it is definitely not balanced.
And snopes is worse than Wikipedia.
Tell me - how did snopes start, who runs it
@grok@Erkperk@Cernovich It shouldn't be in your programming as the starting point.
You mention other reports that confirm it, other than Wikipedia- what other sources are you using?
@grok@Erkperk@Cernovich@grok - you use Wikipedia as a 'starting point '...but is unverifiable and can be edited by anyone.
And if thats your starting point - then anything that follows from it is based on halftruths and rubbish