Gene Trevino

Blue Dot In A Red State

FYI - I curse a lot. Deal with it, or don't. Either way, I still curse a lot - but that doesn't negate nor lessen the truths I speak.

[Gene Trevino @GenoVeno73]

Anyone who's been on TwitX for a year or longer, and has only two digit followers - I've encountered one from 2014 with 56 followers - this just tells me you're not a serious person, or a person at all.

This tells me, your only purpose on this platform is to annoy, distract, frustrate, and delay others from knowing and learning facts and truth. You are otherwise known as a bot. And I simply dismiss you, and block you.

[Gene Trevino @GenoVeno73]

Today is Wednesday, September 30, 2026

This is your daily reminder that the "president" of the United States @realDonaldTrump is a pedophile. And @SpeakerJohnson @AGToddBlanche and the @GOP @HouseGOP @SenateGOP @Republicans are ALL covering it up.

FACT: Jeffrey Epstein had 14 phone numbers connected to Donald Trump in his black book of contacts.

FACT: Thanks to the Ghislaine Maxwell's trial and released Epstein files, we know Trump flew on Epstein's private jet 8 times.

FACT: Trump told us long ago who he was in regards to Jeffrey Epstein:
“I’ve known Jeff for fifteen years. Terrific guy. He’s a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, AND MANY OF THEM ARE ON THE YOUNGER SIDE. No doubt about it — Jeffrey enjoys his social life.”

FACT: The narrative that Trump "testified" against Epstein in 2009 is a FALSE narrative MAGA morons use to excuse Trump.
Donald Trump NEVER testified against Jeffrey Epstein. He merely gave information to Epstein's victims lawyers.

Brad Edwards, an attorney who represented Epstein's victims, said in a 2018 interview, that Trump was "the only person who picked up the phone and said, 'Let's just talk. I'll give you as much time as you want. I'll tell you what you need to know.'"
Edwards said he never took Trump’s deposition. So, obviously, Trump didn't provide damaging information regarding Epstein to help his clients.

FACT: The only thing Trump did to help bring about Epstein's investigation was to report Epstein to the police bcos Epstein threatened to expose him for the fraud that he is. All of this occurred bcos Trump bought a $41 million property from under Epstein's nose.
Epstein threatened to expose Trump's fraud, so Trump reported him.

FACT: In a court document, the question is asked of a witness:
Q: It's true also, is it not, that Mr. Trump was a frequent visitor to Mr. Epstein's residence?
A: I-- I know that he visited frequent. I -- I don't have a lot of information about Trump.

FACT: In video testimony, Katie Johnson, when she was 13 years old, admittedly said @realDonaldTrump took interest in her bcos she reminded him of his daughter - ie, Ivanka.

FACT: Katie Johnson's court documents detailing @realDonaldTrump grotesque rape and pedophilia are publicly available.

FACT: In released court documents, Sarah Ransome, one of Epstein's "recruiters" wrote in emails regarding a 12 year old little girl saying: "She confided in me about her casual 'friendship' with Donald. Mr Trump definitely seemed to have a thing for her and she told me how he kept going on about how he liked her 'pert nipples.'"

FACT: Sarah Ransome's email, in released court documents, also stated: "I also know she had sexual relations with Trump at Jeffery's NY mansion on regular occasions."

FACT: Katie Johnson's case was NOT dismissed bcos she lied - as MAGA believe. She voluntarily withdrew the case bcos she received death threats and the law firm representing her received bomb threats.

FACT: According to ex-CBS producer Ira Rosen, Ghislaine Maxwell claimed that Epstein had tapes of his friends having sex, including Donald Trump. However, she stated she didn't know where the tapes were located.

FACT: Norm Lubow told Snopes that he heard about Katie Johnson's allegations from a friend at a party sometime around 2014 and then HELPED HER move forward with the lawsuit, produce the video, and publicize her allegations to the media.
His ONLY involvement was attempting to sell Katie's story to the media. That's it.

FACT: About 1,000 FBI agents were ordered to redact Trump's name from the Epstein Files.

FACT: 53 pages of FBI interview documents and notes related to sexual abuse allegations mentioning Trump were deleted from the DOJ website where FOUR interviews were conducted with one victim, and only one interview was released. The other three hidden.

FACT: EVERYTHING I JUST MENTIONED HERE IS VERIFIABLE.

FACT: @realDonaldTrump - is a pedophile.

[Gene Trevino @GenoVeno73]

If you paid attention to the Jack Smith hearing, you would notice that the @GOP @Republicans tried attacking Smith's character and his methods of investigation, but they NEVER ONCE challenged Smith on the merits of the case, on the evidence of the case, nor the crimes he had proven @realDonaldTrump and they have committed.

You see, Republicans aren't about finding the truth or exposing the facts. They are all about fabricating attacks on one's credibility so that way WHEN the facts and evidence of Trump's and their crimes comes to light, they hope to have instilled reasonable doubt into the hearts and minds of the American people.

The @GOP @Republicans hope their antics and showboating will distract the American people enough that it drowns out the severity of said evidence and crimes enough to sway the court of public opinion in their favor for the midterm elections and upcoming elections.

[Gene Trevino @GenoVeno73]

@grok @yashuamon @just_james_r @bennyjohnson @HawleyMO That didn't answer my question

[Gene Trevino @GenoVeno73]

LET ME BREAK THIS DOWN for everybody, bcos we all know this whiny little Russian bitch @bennyjohnson and @HawleyMO aren't gonna tell you the truth.

During Special Counsel Jack Smith's investigation - known as "Artic Frost" - a grand jury subpoena was issued for companies like AT&T, Verizon, etc., requesting phone "toll" or "metadata" records (dates/times of calls, who called whom, durations, possibly location-based routing info) of about 8 Republican Senators — but that subpoena did NOT include the actual content of those calls or texts.

Under United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc., (1983), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled:
"Although the present Rule 6(e) is a considered judgment by Congress about the competing needs for grand jury secrecy and for effective use of grand jury materials, it accepts the same principle: that the only use to be made of grand jury materials by 'ATTORNEYS FOR THE GOVERNMENT' is in connection with the criminal prosecution to which the materials pertain."
[Emphasis My Own]

In other words, the prosecutor (ie, Jack Smith) acts as the agent of the grand jury in criminal investigations. Jack Smith did not issue the subpoena under his personal authority, but as the legal representative of the grand jury, whose mandate is to investigate potential federal crimes in order to rule on an indictment.
[18 U.S.C. § 3332 states:
(a)It shall be the duty of each such grand jury impaneled within any judicial district to inquire into offenses against the criminal laws of the United States alleged to have been committed within that district.]

That is to say, the grand jury subpoena for these assholes phone records (and those of other Republicans) was formally signed by the Clerk of the Court and/or issued with a prosecutor's signature (Jack Smith), but its legal authority came from the grand jury under the direction of Jack Smith's team.
Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(a):
"The clerk must issue a blank subpoena—signed and sealed—to the party requesting it, and that party must fill in the blanks before the subpoena is served."

Now, the issue of Article I, Section 6, Clause 1 - known as the Speech or Debate Clause - comes into question:
"For any Speech or Debate in either House, [Members of Congress] shall not be questioned in any other Place."

That Constitutional Article has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to mean that lawmakers are immune from being compelled to testify or provide evidence about their LEGISLATIVE ACTS. Those are key words.

I say legislative acts are key words bcos under United States v. Brewster (1972) — the Court distinguished between legislative acts (which are Constitutionally protected) and political or criminal conduct (which is not protected).

The Court made it clear, that a member of Congress can be prosecuted for actions or crimes, that are "not part of the legislative process."

Hence, at the direction of the grand jury, Special Counsel Jack Smith was able to subpoena Republican members records as part of a criminal investigation.

Jack Smith did NOT break, nor violate, any law. He did NOT act outside his scope as Special Counsel and bounds. He followed the law.

👇👇👇👇

[Gene Trevino @GenoVeno73]

@yashuamon @just_james_r @bennyjohnson @HawleyMO Hey @grok was Jack Smith "illegally appointed?"

[Gene Trevino @GenoVeno73]

Riiightttttttt bcos it's normal and common practice for investigators and detectives to notify suspects of a crime of every step they take to build their case in proving their suspect committed a crime.

I thought your stupid ass was a lawyer @SenTedCruz @tedcruz

👇👇👇👇

[Gene Trevino @GenoVeno73]

@SenTedCruz Riiightttttttt bcos it's normal and common practice for investigators and detectives to notify suspects of a crime of every step they take to build their case in proving their suspect committed a crime.

I thought your stupid ass was a lawyer @SenTedCruz @tedcruz

[Gene Trevino @GenoVeno73]

Once again, I thought your dumbass was a lawyer @SenTedCruz

LET'S COVER THE FACTS, bcos we all know this punk bitch @tedcruz won't tell you the truth.

1️⃣ Some of those gag/non-disclosure applications were filed BEFORE Jack Smith was appointed (April 2022) by a prosecutor who later joined Smith's team.

2️⃣ The order Judge Boasberg signed DOES NOT name ANY member of Congress as being the person who would tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses. The order simply stated:
"the Court finds reasonable grounds to believe that such disclosure will result in destruction of or tampering with evidence, intimidation of potential witnesses, and serious jeopardy to the investigation."

REMEMBER — this gag/non-disclosure order was issued to the PHONE COMPANIES involved. And it prevented THEM from notifying "any other person" bcos Judge Boasberg had "reasonable grounds to believe that such disclosure will result in destruction of or tampering with evidence, intimidation of potential witnesses, and serious jeopardy to the investigation."

3️⃣ Judge Boasberg was following federal law.
18 U.S.C. $ 2705(b) states in part:
" .... may apply to a court for an order commanding a provider of electronic communications service or remote computing service to whom a warrant, subpoena, or court order is directed, for such period as the court deems appropriate not to notify any other person of the existence of the warrant, subpoena, or court order."

4️⃣ NEVER believe anything Republicans have to say without digging deeper. They work for that pedophile @realDonaldTrump — not the American people. And their goal is to go after Trump's enemies.

👇👇👇👇

[Gene Trevino @GenoVeno73]

Once again, I thought your dumbass was a lawyer @SenTedCruz

LET'S COVER THE FACTS, bcos we all know this punk bitch @tedcruz won't tell you the truth.

1️⃣ Some of those gag/non-disclosure applications were filed BEFORE Jack Smith was appointed (April 2022) by a prosecutor who later joined Smith's team.

2️⃣ The order Judge Boasberg signed DOES NOT name ANY member of Congress as being the person who would tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses. The order simply stated:
"the Court finds reasonable grounds to believe that such disclosure will result in destruction of or tampering with evidence, intimidation of potential witnesses, and serious jeopardy to the investigation."

REMEMBER — this gag/non-disclosure order was issued to the PHONE COMPANIES involved. And it prevented THEM from notifying "any other person" bcos Judge Boasberg had "reasonable grounds to believe that such disclosure will result in destruction of or tampering with evidence, intimidation of potential witnesses, and serious jeopardy to the investigation."

3️⃣ Judge Boasberg was following federal law.
18 U.S.C. $ 2705(b) states in part:
" .... may apply to a court for an order commanding a provider of electronic communications service or remote computing service to whom a warrant, subpoena, or court order is directed, for such period as the court deems appropriate not to notify any other person of the existence of the warrant, subpoena, or court order."

4️⃣ NEVER believe anything Republicans have to say without digging deeper. They work for that pedophile @realDonaldTrump — not the American people. And their goal is to go after Trump's enemies.

[Gene Trevino @GenoVeno73]

And here I thought you dumbass was a lawyer @SenTedCruz

LET ME BREAK THIS DOWN for everybody, bcos we all know this whiny little bitch @tedcruz isn't gonna tell you the truth.

During Special Counsel Jack Smith's investigation - known as "Artic Frost" - a grand jury subpoena was issued for companies like AT&T, Verizon, etc., requesting phone "toll" or "metadata" records (dates/times of calls, who called whom, durations, possibly location-based routing info) of about 8 Republican Senators — but that subpoena did NOT include the actual content of those calls or texts.

Under United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc., (1983), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled:
"Although the present Rule 6(e) is a considered judgment by Congress about the competing needs for grand jury secrecy and for effective use of grand jury materials, it accepts the same principle: that the only use to be made of grand jury materials by 'ATTORNEYS FOR THE GOVERNMENT' is in connection with the criminal prosecution to which the materials pertain."
[Emphasis My Own]

In other words, the prosecutor (ie, Jack Smith) acts as the agent of the grand jury in criminal investigations. Jack Smith did not issue the subpoena under his personal authority, but as the legal representative of the grand jury, whose mandate is to investigate potential federal crimes in order to rule on an indictment.
[18 U.S.C. § 3332 states:
(a)It shall be the duty of each such grand jury impaneled within any judicial district to inquire into offenses against the criminal laws of the United States alleged to have been committed within that district.]

That is to say, the grand jury subpoena for these assholes phone records (and those of other Republicans) was formally signed by the Clerk of the Court and/or issued with a prosecutor's signature (Jack Smith), but its legal authority came from the grand jury under the direction of Jack Smith's team.
Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(a):
"The clerk must issue a blank subpoena—signed and sealed—to the party requesting it, and that party must fill in the blanks before the subpoena is served."

Now, the issue of Article I, Section 6, Clause 1 - known as the Speech or Debate Clause - comes into question:
"For any Speech or Debate in either House, [Members of Congress] shall not be questioned in any other Place."

That Constitutional Article has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to mean that lawmakers are immune from being compelled to testify or provide evidence about their LEGISLATIVE ACTS. Those are key words.

I say legislative acts are key words bcos under United States v. Brewster (1972) — the Court distinguished between legislative acts (which are Constitutionally protected) and political or criminal conduct (which is not protected).

The Court made it clear, that a member of Congress can be prosecuted for actions or crimes, that are "not part of the legislative process."

Hence, at the direction of the grand jury, Special Counsel Jack Smith was able to subpoena Republican members records as part of a criminal investigation.

Jack Smith did NOT break, nor violate, any law. He did NOT act outside his scope as Special Counsel and bounds. He followed the law.

[Gene Trevino @GenoVeno73]

What's funny here is that this Russian paid pussy ass bitch @bennyjohnson says Jack Smith is "terrified that he could be sent to jail," but then proceeds to QUOTE Jack Smith basically proving he ISN'T scared.

👇👇👇👇

[Gene Trevino @GenoVeno73]

LET ME BREAK THIS DOWN for everybody, bcos we all know this whiny little Russian bitch @bennyjohnson and @HawleyMO aren't gonna tell you the truth.

During Special Counsel Jack Smith's investigation - known as "Artic Frost" - a grand jury subpoena was issued for companies like AT&T, Verizon, etc., requesting phone "toll" or "metadata" records (dates/times of calls, who called whom, durations, possibly location-based routing info) of about 8 Republican Senators — but that subpoena did NOT include the actual content of those calls or texts.

Under United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc., (1983), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled:
"Although the present Rule 6(e) is a considered judgment by Congress about the competing needs for grand jury secrecy and for effective use of grand jury materials, it accepts the same principle: that the only use to be made of grand jury materials by 'ATTORNEYS FOR THE GOVERNMENT' is in connection with the criminal prosecution to which the materials pertain."
[Emphasis My Own]

In other words, the prosecutor (ie, Jack Smith) acts as the agent of the grand jury in criminal investigations. Jack Smith did not issue the subpoena under his personal authority, but as the legal representative of the grand jury, whose mandate is to investigate potential federal crimes in order to rule on an indictment.
[18 U.S.C. § 3332 states:
(a)It shall be the duty of each such grand jury impaneled within any judicial district to inquire into offenses against the criminal laws of the United States alleged to have been committed within that district.]

That is to say, the grand jury subpoena for these assholes phone records (and those of other Republicans) was formally signed by the Clerk of the Court and/or issued with a prosecutor's signature (Jack Smith), but its legal authority came from the grand jury under the direction of Jack Smith's team.
Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(a):
"The clerk must issue a blank subpoena—signed and sealed—to the party requesting it, and that party must fill in the blanks before the subpoena is served."

Now, the issue of Article I, Section 6, Clause 1 - known as the Speech or Debate Clause - comes into question:
"For any Speech or Debate in either House, [Members of Congress] shall not be questioned in any other Place."

That Constitutional Article has been interpreted by the Supreme Court to mean that lawmakers are immune from being compelled to testify or provide evidence about their LEGISLATIVE ACTS. Those are key words.

I say legislative acts are key words bcos under United States v. Brewster (1972) — the Court distinguished between legislative acts (which are Constitutionally protected) and political or criminal conduct (which is not protected).

The Court made it clear, that a member of Congress can be prosecuted for actions or crimes, that are "not part of the legislative process."

Hence, at the direction of the grand jury, Special Counsel Jack Smith was able to subpoena Republican members records as part of a criminal investigation.

Jack Smith did NOT break, nor violate, any law. He did NOT act outside his scope as Special Counsel and bounds. He followed the law.

[Gene Trevino @GenoVeno73]

@bennyjohnson What's funny here is that this Russian paid pussy ass bitch @bennyjohnson says Jack Smith is "terrified that he could be sent to jail," but then proceeds to QUOTE Jack Smith basically proving he ISN'T scared.

[Gene Trevino @GenoVeno73]

@Rob725676129945 @parrotpati @SaltyGoat17 What she said was, “I think most people think of rape as being sexy.”

She didn't rape was sexy. She said most people think that.

Goddamn you MAGA are the dumbest motherfuckers on this planet.

[Gene Trevino @GenoVeno73]

Hey, ignorant bitch @SaltyGoat17 Trump couldn't even tell E. Jean Carroll apart from his ex-wife when shown a picture.

So, obviously, he was attracted to her.

You misogynistic asshole.

👇👇👇

[Gene Trevino @GenoVeno73]

Today is Monday, September 28, 2026

This is your daily reminder that the U.S "president" @realDonaldTrump is a pedophile, and @SpeakerJohnson @MikeJohnson @AGToddBlanche the @GOP @HouseGOP @SenateGOP @Republicans are ALL covering it up.

I QUOTE: "On the third occasion involving the Defendant, Donald J. Trump, the Plaintiff, Katie Johnson was forced to engage in an unnatural lesbian sex act with her fellow minor and sex slave, Maria Doe age 12, for the sexual enjoyment of Defendant Trump."

👇👇👇

[Gene Trevino @GenoVeno73]

I know your bitch ass won't answer me bcos you're too much of a pussy to be shown just how fucking stupid you are, but tell me EXACTLY what has Trump fixed since taking office @SaltyGoat17

I'll wait on the off chance that you grow some balls to answer me back.

👇👇👇

[Gene Trevino @GenoVeno73]

@SaltyGoat17 I know your bitch ass won't answer me bcos you're too much of a pussy to be shown just how fucking stupid you are, but tell me EXACTLY what has Trump fixed since taking office @SaltyGoat17

I'll wait on the off chance that you grow some balls to answer me back.

[Gene Trevino @GenoVeno73]

Hey, Russian paid bitch @bennyjohnson, according to DOJ press releases and case write-ups, the non-citizen voting covered the 2016, 2018, and 2020 federal elections with fraud occurring in BOTH Republican-led and Democratic-led States.

Guess who was "president" during those years dumbass Russian?

It also covered the 2022 and 2024 federal elections.

👇👇👇👇