If you are a profitable company and AI is deflationary across ALL asset classes + global governments run structured multi-trillion dollar deficits nominally, where should said person park their earnings moving forward? 🧐.
Is there any asset AI cannot deflate? The answer is in plain sight.. 🫡
May we say that the Bitcoin bros were right, again? There's value in Bitcoin(Digital SoV), there's value in stables(Digital Dollar), there is zero value everywhere else. The entire "industry" and especially the large exchanges aided and abetted the dilution by enticing gambling of worthless tokens by proliferating the bitcoin narrative into everything OTHER than Bitcoin.
Is it fair or cool to say the Bitcoin bros were right.. again? There’s no there there in “crypto”. Just absolute grift, PvP, and “extraction”. Crypto bros literally named it extraction because NO ONE actually thinks it’s an investment or bet on any technology. Bitcoin=SoV, Stablecoins=digital dollar. Hate to break the news but no bank or stablecoin provider is going to adopt ETH/Solana long term as their layer 1 when they can just build it themselves, which they’re currently doing. Either the “industry” consolidates back to BTC or this was all for not.
@EricBalchunas One should assume the first 1-2 weeks of inflows are just OG crypto bros of said token moving their onchain token to ETF’s so net real inflows are probably just a could hundred thousand. Outside of BTC and ETH to an extent, I imagine the net new demand is very minimal.
Couldn’t agree more and this has been my experience. Depending on the complexity of what you’re building, the typical steps have been to introduce a new feature to the LLM, plan back and forth with the LLM ( have it review current code base, verify/adjust implementation), have it write and deploy the code in my local test branch, then spend the next few hours to a day debugging and testing, then pull to the main branch. If it’s generating code for longer than about 4 minutes, be concerned. The longer it runs, the more hours I spent debugging. I’ve had much better experience making iterative changes/features than letting it run wild for 10+ minutes. Utilizing the LLM from the Command Line Interface in GitHub has been the winning strategy for me because when you’re planning, you can actually have it go through your code in real time and adjust the plan as needed before it implements.
You spoken about consciousness or the soul being in a separate field. Matter and a particular human body being almost like a frequency in which the soul substrate can manifest itself in this plain/field. You’ve mentioned in previous x messages that reality itself is recursive and reflexive. In essence, it’s in a quantum state where the dreamer(s) rewrite the quantum rendering we all perceive in real time(my interpretation). You have spoken about how consciousness effectively bends back on itself in almost mirror form to view itself through what we call matter.
Can you speak to LOVE or the interpretation of the word? Is there some substrate that it lies on or perhaps slices through each plain…. Or is it just another human delusion we’ve conveniently created for reproductive purposes? I’ve always thought that humans or any organism reproducing is like the equivalent of nuclear fusion vs. fission. By colliding the two particles, you can yield more than two sums apart. Effectively defying local physics. Is there something deeper in this though that may be useful? Is this some elegant cheat code to entropy?
@BTCAxis@_The_Prophet__ I don’t disagree. I just think the human brain gets hijacked when we utilize “Him” or terms similar. You fall into a frame of worshiping another entity you believe is observing you vs. realizing it IS you (again something also taught in the Bible).
If you replace the word “Christ” with “Field”, and remove him/her phrasing, you’re arriving at the same point. Personally, not utilizing gender terms or names allows the mind to expand on these ideas vs. being trapped in the prism of thinking of God/Christ as an entity simply observing versus iterating on itself.
It also makes you ponder exactly what vector are we traveling in, and what vector are the galaxies traveling in. If every object is moving, how exactly do we even calculate, accurately, what direction and velocity everything else is traveling. Maybe traveling the stars has less to do with propulsion systems and more to do with effectively bringing your rate of space speed to zero or near zero in some type of antigravity bubble you can artificially create in a confined space. To the observer, us, it would look like insane ludicrous speeds at hyper acceleration with no propulsion but in cosmic reality, you just plant a stick in the cosmic river and wait for the next planet/location to arrive to YOU before releasing the stick and flowing back at the cosmic river rate. I’d be very interested to understand how one could actually maneuver to various locations. What happens if there’s a location “upstream”? How does one get there? What are the vector controls when you’re in the anti gravity bubble? 🧐🧐
If you didn’t list every trashcoin known to mankind, this would resonant much better. You’re using the ethos of Bitcoin to lure every degen to trade “cryptos” so you make a profit. How is that better than what you are advertising🧐. You have won the war regarding regulations. Now you’re at the crossroads and it’s time to choose a side. Promoting degenerate gambling or aligning with the ad you just made.
In some respects, you could frame every human mind as a quantum computer, capable of an infinite number of outcomes and possibilities given enough time, energy, and focus. If you suppose a unit of currency is just a proxy for fungible energy, then yes, at some level of money, you should have the ability to quite literally bend localized reality to whatever quantum state you decide to live in. In my opinion however, death is the friction point even the most powerful people/quantums cannot overcome.....yet. An even more interesting question is how much can reality warp if humans double our lifespans over the next 10 years? Suppose the most powerful can live beautifully and healthy to 160+ years old. How will our shared quantum reality arc bend in these scenarios? Could someone wealthy enough with enough focus quite literally co-op every other mind into their quantum reality? Kind of reminds me of Agent Anderson in the matrix duplicating himself until he took over the planet.
In some respects, you could frame every human mind as a quantum computer, capable of an infinite number of outcomes and possibilities given enough time, energy, and focus. If you suppose a unit of currency is just a proxy for fungible energy, then yes, at some level of money, you should have the ability to quite literally bend localized reality to whatever quantum state you decide to live in. In my opinion however, death is the friction point even the most powerful people/quantums cannot overcome.....yet. An even more interesting question is how much can reality warp if humans double our lifespans over the next 10 years? Suppose the most powerful can live beautifully and healthy to 160+ years old. How will our shared quantum reality arc bend in these scenarios? Could someone wealthy enough with enough focus quite literally co-op every other mind into their quantum reality? Kind of reminds me of Agent Anderson in the matrix duplicating himself until he took over the planet.
Frankly it doesn't matter. The higher-level observation is not whether it is AI or human, but rather its ability to accurately recognize and frame an issue in a method that is more easily absorbed. The framing was spot on and rings true. So, take the observation and keep moving!