Fighting: Where the Korean Influence Actually Lives
When I first started thinking about exploring Korean influences in SEVENTEENโs music, I instinctively looked for a song where that influence would be obvious. Traditional instruments, references to gugak, maybe a melody that immediately points somewhere unmistakably Korean.
Then I thought about โFighting,โ and honestly, it turned out to be a much more interesting place to start.
Musically, there is very little about โFightingโ that sounds traditionally Korean. It is built around contemporary pop, funk, energetic drums, rap, and the kind of bright, almost excessive energy that makes it impossible to sit still. If we define โKorean influenceโ only by instrumentation or melody, there is not much to find.
But culture does not only survive in instruments.
Sometimes it survives in a word, in a grammatical ending, in a joke, in the way people complain about being tired, or in the particular way a song talks to its audience.
That is where โFightingโ becomes interesting.
1. The title is already a piece of Korean linguistic history
The first thing that stands out is ํ์ดํ ํด์ผ์ง (paiting haeyaji).
To an English speaker, โfightingโ naturally suggests conflict. In Korean, ํ์ดํ has taken on a completely different life. It is an established expression of encouragement: something you say when you want someone to do their best, get through something difficult, or simply keep going.
The word itself comes from English, but the meaning is no longer simply English.
This is one of those cases where a borrowed word becomes part of the language that adopts it. In Korean everyday speech, ํ์ดํ does not require anyone to imagine an actual fight. It can be said before an exam, before work, before a competition, or when a friend is about to deal with something unpleasant.
That is why translating ํ์ดํ as simply โfightโ misses the point.
Depending on the context, it can be closer to โyou've got this,โ โhang in there,โ โlet's do this,โ or simply โkeep going.โ
The interesting part is that none of those translations quite reproduce the Korean expression itself.
And then there is ํด์ผ์ง.
2. ํด์ผ์ง changes the entire mood
ํด์ผ์ง comes from ํ๋ค, โto do,โ combined with the -์/์ด์ผ์ง construction. In context, it can carry the feeling of recognizing what one has to do: โI should,โ โI have to,โ โgotta,โ or โwell, I guess I have to.โ
So ํ์ดํ ํด์ผ์ง is not quite the same thing as somebody dramatically yelling:
FIGHT!
It can sound much more like:
โGotta keep going, I guess.โ
That difference matters because it tells us what kind of motivational song โFightingโ actually is.
The central line, ํ๋ด์ผ์ง ๋ญ ์ด์ฉ๊ฒ ์ด, roughly carries the feeling of โI have to keep going what else can I do?โ
There is no grand speech about becoming the best version of yourself.
The song starts with something much less glamorous: the alarm goes off, you want to sleep longer, breakfast gets skipped, coffee is bought on the way, and everyone else on social media somehow seems to be doing better than you.
The problem is not a dramatic personal tragedy.
The problem is that it is Monday morning.
And you are tired.
3. It is almost an anti-motivational song
A lot of motivational pop works by creating a distance between where you are now and where you could eventually be. You are struggling today, but someday you will succeed. Keep pushing, believe in yourself, and everything will work out.
โFightingโ is not particularly interested in that fantasy.
It looks at the exhaustion itself.
The commuters are described as โzombies wearing earphones.โ The lyrics move through the small frustrations of an ordinary morning rather than building toward some enormous personal triumph.
That is part of why the song feels comforting.
It does not tell you that everything is fine.
+
The phrase "Army's Against Abusers" is BANNED in the comments of BangtanTv's YouTube, and the phrase "Woman Before Army" is BANNED on Weverse.
This measure was taken to protect Chris Brown, RM and J-hope.
What These โAll-Time First-Week Salesโ Actually Mean
Thereโs a problem with calling this a ranking of the โhighest first-week sales worldwide of all timeโ: the numbers shown here are not all measuring the same thing.
The graphic is based on ChartMasters data, but ChartMastersโ EAS figures should not automatically be treated as physical album sales or compared directly with Hanteoโs Initial Chodong numbers.
ChartMasters uses its CSPC (Commensurate Sales to Popularity Concept) methodology, which combines different forms of music consumption and converts them into EAS (Equivalent Album Sales). Depending on the release, this can include physical and digital album sales, digital singles and streaming. Its current streaming conversion is 1,500 audio streams = 1 album unit and 6,750 video views = 1 album unit.
So before calling these โfirst-week sales,โ we need to be clear about what each number actually represents.
Michael Jackson โ Dangerous: 9M
This is one of the clearest examples of why the graphic is misleading.
ChartMasters currently estimates Dangerous at 29.99M pure album sales and 49.47M total EAS. The 9M shown in the graphic is therefore not ChartMastersโ current total EAS figure.
The 9M figure is a historical first-week figure that has been widely reported. But Dangerous was released in 1991, when the global market was not tracked in the same way it is today. Historical shipment and retail figures also cannot simply be treated as equivalent to the modern global first-week metrics used for K-pop releases.
So presenting 9M alongside modern EAS figures as if they were the same metric is misleading.
Michael Jackson โ Bad: 7M
The same issue applies to Bad.
ChartMasters currently lists Bad at 34.31M pure album sales and 69.67M total EAS. The 7M in the graphic is not its current ChartMasters EAS figure.
Again, 7M is a historical first-week figure that has been repeatedly reported, but it comes from a completely different sales-tracking environment.
That doesn't mean the historical figure is meaningless. It means it shouldn't be presented as directly equivalent to a modern worldwide EAS figure.
SEVENTEEN โ Seventeenth Heaven: 5.9M
This one is different because ChartMasters actually has an EAS figure in this range for Seventeenth Heaven.
Its current database gives the album around 6.14M studio-album EAS, with additional EAS bringing the total to 7.09M. The figure can change as ChartMasters updates its database.
The 5.9M in the graphic therefore appears to be an older ChartMasters EAS figure, not SEVENTEEN's official first-week physical sales.
Hanteo's official Initial Chodong figure for Seventeenth Heaven is 5,091,887 copies.
So we're looking at two different numbers:
5.09M = official Hanteo first-week album sales
5.9M = older ChartMasters EAS estimate
Those numbers cannot be treated as interchangeable.
Adele โ 25: 5.7M
This one is much easier to trace.
ChartMasters lists 25 at 30.25M total EAS and separately identifies 5.7M equivalent units during its release week.
So the 5.7M figure is not 5.7M physical albums sold. It refers to equivalent album units.
Guinness also records 5.7M global equivalent album units for 25 during its release week.
This is an important distinction because the graphic simply labels the number as โfirst week sales,โ which makes it sound like a pure sales figure.
BTS โ ARIRANG: 5.6M
The same metric issue appears here.
ChartMasters currently lists ARIRANG at around 5.43M studio-album EAS, with 6.95M total EAS when the other components are included.
So the 5.6M shown in the graphic is essentially a ChartMasters EAS figure, not Hanteo's first-week physical sales.
Hanteo's official Initial Chodong figure is 4,169,464 copies.
Again:
4.17M = Hanteo first-week physical album sales
~5.6M = ChartMasters EAS
Both numbers can exist without either one being โfake.โ They are simply measuring different things.
older gen kpop fans knows exactly what vernon is saying bc we saw the change happening right in front of our eyes.
now im stuck with this nostalgia of musical elements that i donโt see anymore. kpop will always consist of these powerhouses to me