Nat

Jewish Australian from Adelaide. Watching the reaction of the world media and people around me after October 7th, changed me.

[The Persian Jewess @persianjewess]

Iranian hairstylist Ami Moghadam received death threats for posting videos of women receiving haircuts on Instagram.

So she decided to troll the Islamic Regime and their oppressive mandatory hijab laws in the most epic, hilarious way possible. 😂

[Imre Salusinszky @Imresal]

Didn’t realise @AlboMP was on a genocidal crusade.

We need to keep reminding ourselves: the anti-Zios aren’t just wrong about everything — they are completely and utterly deranged.

[Nat @Gnatrix]

https://t.co/cgBtJWw1Lc

[Eyal Yakoby @EYakoby]

Countries with death penalty for gay people:
🇮🇷 Iran
🇦🇫 Afghanistan
🇾🇪 Yemen
🇸🇦 Saudi Arabia
🇲🇷 Mauritania
🇶🇦 Qatar
🇧🇳 Brunei

Countries with death penalty for terrorists:
🇮🇱 Israel
🇯🇵 Japan
🇺🇸 USA
🇸🇬 Singapore
🇹🇼 Taiwan
🇹🇭 Thailand

Guess which one European are outraged over.

[Arsen Ostrovsky @Ostrov_A]

"Once hate goes unchecked, the road to tragedy is short. That is why I cannot stay silent. For it is not only Jews who are at risk. So too is our humanity.”

In 2018, @rabbisacks delivered this powerful warning in the House of Lords. Tragically, his words went unheeded.

[Daniel Schatz @drdanielschatz]

In 1968, Poland’s communist regime launched an antisemitic campaign that drove out much of the country’s remaining Jews. How was that possible in a system that officially claimed to outlaw antisemitism?

Because the regime changed the language, not the substance. The communists called the campaign “anti-Zionist.” In practice, however, “Zionist” functioned as a coded term for Jew. Anti-Zionism became the politically acceptable vocabulary through which antisemitism could once again be expressed, legitimized, and enforced.

The same mechanism is visible today. Once again, communists, Islamists, and their fellow travelers mask antisemitism in the language of anti-Zionism. Legitimate criticism of Israel is one thing. Turning “Zionist” into a slur, treating Jews as collectively suspect, and excusing threats, intimidation, or violence as anti-colonial resistance is something else. At that point, this is no longer principled political criticism. It is an old hatred dressed up in a new ideological costume.

The lesson of 1968 is that antisemitism rarely speaks in its own name. It hides behind fashionable slogans, moral grandstanding, and ideological camouflage. But the target remains the same. We know where that road leads. That is why it must be identified early, called what it is, and confronted before rhetoric once again turns into expulsion, violence, and fear.

[Mossad Commentary @MOSSADil]

🚨 PROPAGANDA COLLAPSED LIVE ON AIR
Journalist Rajdeep Sardesai asked Iranian actress Elnaaz Norouzi about the situation in Iran.

He tried the usual narrative:
“Bombing is terrible… civilians are dying… school girls died.”

Her response stunned the room:
“Our regime has massacred Iranians for 47 years. When girls were poisoned in schools and thousands executed by the regime, where were you all?”

[Vivid.🇮🇱 @VividProwess]

Hamas leaders, on October 7th, 2023, celebrated in Qatar while watching Hamas massacre 1,200 Israelis.

2.5 years later, most of them are dead, Gaza is in ruins, Hamas is destroyed, and Israel is stronger than ever.

Never forget how it all started.

[Cenk Uygur @cenkuygur]

Who has done more damage to the world?

[Hen Mazzig @HenMazzig]

Funny how so many celebrities who claimed they “weren’t educated enough about Iran” to speak up when 40,000+ Iranians were slaughtered by the regime last month suddenly feel informed enough now that Israel is involved.

[The Persian Jewess @persianjewess]

@RashidaTlaib Nothing to say about when Iran bombed a Palestinian hospital?

Nothing to say when the Islamic Regime murdered 35,000 innocent Iranians over 2 months?

But so much to say when you can attack Israel.

You’re a disgrace. Cry harder, your sugar daddy is gone.

[Kosher @koshercockney]

Iran hit a Palestinian hospital.

Where’s Jeremy Bowen? BBC? Sky News? CNN? The rest of them?

Or do they only care when Jews are involved?

[Carl @HistoryBoomer]

It’s cool that Salman Rushdie has outlived 2 Ayatollahs.

[Arsen Ostrovsky @Ostrov_A]

Notice how all these so-called new “international law experts” rushing to condemn President Trump & Israel over the military strike against Iran, were silent weeks ago, as Iran massacred thousands of its own people, while building illicit nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles?

[Shai Davidai @ShaiDavidai]

She is American.
She survived the October 7 Massacre.
If you truly care about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, you should listen to her.

[Arsen Ostrovsky @Ostrov_A]

A reminder, Hamas continues to be, as it always was, the primary threat to peace in Gaza. Until they lay down their arms, there can be no real and lasting peace, including as envisaged by President Trump and supported by the int’l community.

[Keren Zelwer @KerenZelwer]

Seriously grateful @MenachemV - well done. Free speech is not absolute!

[Eve Barlow @Eve_Barlow]

This is what a modern Nazi looks like

[Keren Zelwer @KerenZelwer]

Very pleased to see the IHRA definition of antisemitism is being used in the Royal Commission in Australia.
Before the haters start claiming that criticism of Israeli government or policies is being stifled, a reminder that none of these (within reason) fall into the IHRA definition of antisemitism. Even if antizionists try claim otherwise over and over. #Australia #antisemitism #auspol

[Hillel Fuld @HilzFuld]

The Middle East conflict 101:

UN in 1947: “Here is a state for you, the Jews, and here is a state for you, the Arabs.”

The Jews: “Awesome. Thanks. We’ve only been waiting for this for thousands of years.”

The Arabs: “Sorry no. We’d rather attack than have a state. We don’t want a state. We want no Israel.”

The Jews: “Sorry you attacked and lost.”

The Arabs: “Don’t worry. We’ll be back.”

The Jews: “Here. Take land. Make a state. We just want peace.”

The Arabs: “No. No state. No Israel.”

The Jews in 1967 (Khartoum summit): “Here. Take land. Make a state. We just want peace.”

The Arabs: “No. No state. No Israel.”

The Jews in 1991 (Madrid Conference): “Here. Take land. Make a state. We just want peace.”

The Arabs: “No. No state. No Israel.”

The Jews in 2000 (Camp David Summit): “Here. Take land. Make a state. We just want peace.”

The Arabs: “No. No state. No Israel.”

The Jews in 2001 (Taba Sunmit), 2005 (Disengagement), 2007 (Annapolis conference), 2008 (realignment plan), 2010, 2013 (Joint peace talks), 2019 (Bahrain workshop), 2020 (Trump peace plan): “Here. Take land. Make a state. We just want peace.”

The Arabs: “No. No state. No Israel.”

The world in 2024: “Let’s give them a state.”

The Arabs: “No. No state. No Israel.”

The Jews: “Ok, no state for you.”

The world? “Those Jews!”

And then there are the wars that the Arabs attacked the Jews and lost: 1948 (war of independence), 1967 (six day war), 1973 (Yom Kippur war), 1982 (Lebanon war), 1987 (first intifada), 2000 (second intifada), 2006 (second Lebanon war), 2008 (operation cast lead), 2012 (operation pillar of defense), 2014 (operation protective edge), 2021 (operation guardian of the walls), 2023 (operation swords of iron).

The fact that there is a single human being on planet earth who still doesn’t get the following fact is insane and mind boggling.

The Jews want peace. The Arabs who call themselves Palestinians do not. They never have. They never will.

Want proof?

The PLO: The Palestinian liberation organization was established on May 28th, 1964. There were no settlements then. There was no occupation. What exactly were they looking to liberate? The answer is Israel, every last inch of it.

There was Arab terror against Jews well before there was any occupation. There was Arab terror against Jews before there was even a state of Israel.

1929, for example. Arabs massacred Jews in Hebron. Why? It was 1929. Israel was established in 1948.

How exactly does that work? Were they massacring Jews to resist the future occupation? 😂

Anyone who thinks that offering the Palestinians a state will solve anything is a fool. Period. Full stop.

It’s time the world learned Arabic. The Palestinians want dead Jews. They say it, they vote for it, they act towards it, and then they live stream it.

And yes, I said Palestinian, not Hamas.

The Palestinian people elected Hamas. Thousands of them participated in October 7th in one way or another. Close to 90% of the Palestinians support Hamas.

The Palestinian people exist from day one for the sole purpose of destroying Israel. It’s their entire identity.

They keep trying and keep failing.

They don’t seem to learn their lesson and neither does the international community.

Israel wants peace. Israel is willing to make compromises for peace. Israel also knows well how to handle its enemies when necessary. It has a lot of experience.

If you are still reading, and disagree with anything I wrote above, kindly tell me what is inaccurate about what I said and if you can’t, if you agree with the facts I listed here, tell me please how, in 2026, after October 7th, anyone still thinks the Palestinians want or deserve a state.

Congratulations on completing your course on the Middle East. You are now officially more knowledgeable about the conflict than 99% of Gen Z and pro Palestinian activities who take to the streets every day chanting for the murder of Jews.

Thank you for attending.

Any questions?