Your whole world is about gaslighting. You post screeds that are not only factually incorrect, they promote evil. You should be checking your premises… instead you’ve chosen to be a propagandist for the worst economic and ethical system known to man. There is a point at which this doesn’t merely come from naïveté and ignorance… but from a conscious rejection of reality. Evasion is the worst sin you can commit. In part because it is a sin against the efficacy of your own mind and against reality itself
By the socialist standard, "taking" often means refusing to surrender what they've decided belongs to someone else.
If you keep what you earned through voluntary trade, that's exploitation.
If a politician takes it and redistributes it, that's compassion.
The entire trick is redefining ownership so that keeping your own property becomes theft, while taking someone else's becomes justice.
En un país donde vuelan los machetes y las violaciones por parte de los de siempre, a esta progre le da miedo ver a jóvenes rezando.
En serio, tienen un trastorno muy chungo.
"Antonio Maestre iba para fascista, pero se corrigió. Curiosamente, los que acabamos siendo fascistas fuimos todos los demás. Esto es más o menos lo que expone en su ensayo Me crié como un fascista (Seix Barral), donde narra el fracaso de su infancia y de su juventud, que le querían facha, y el fracaso de nuestra madurez, que nos hizo fachas. Él ahora es bueno y nosotros (los hombres en general), malos. Es el resumen de su libro" @alb_olmos https://t.co/I1K3TwY62s
JUAN CARLOS. El funcionario del SEPE expedientado por trabajar habla claro.
Le denunció un compañero de la oficina porque les ponía en un compromiso atendiendo a tantas personas. El ratio de los demás quedaba en ridículo.
Atendía a personas que llegaban sin cita porque los locutorios de pakistanís conseguían todas las citas con bots y luego no revendían todas, había días donde en un día llegaban 2 o 3 personas con cita y el resto de funcionarios no atendían a nadie. Juan Carlos atendía a cualquiera durante su jornada
https://t.co/ylhtmqvUzD
Food isn't a right.
The ability to acquire food is.
The moment food itself becomes a right, someone else becomes obligated to produce it, transport it, pay for it, or surrender it.
Civilization wasn't built so people could live off one another. It was built so people could cooperate through trade and produce enough that starvation became increasingly rare.
The systems most obsessed with declaring food a right are the ones with the worst record of causing famines.
@michaelevknight He wants a totalitarian dictatorship with bureaucrats, who don't have a clue how to run a business, in charge expecting a different outcome than the GDR and Ceauşescu Romania.
@michaelevknight People can work on whatever the market has demand for. Nothing prevents people from working for themselves other than fear of failure. Billionaires don’t prevent people from Burger own businesses or working as independent contractors or consultants.
@michaelevknight If you take a CPU out of a computer it would still "work". Draw electricity. Spin the fans. It's not exactly productive work, now is it?
@michaelevknight Business leaders follow the market. They build the factories to make the things people want to pay them money for.
It's literally the purest form of democracy.
You don't even work for Jeff Bezos if you work for Amazon. You work for the people who buy stuff from Amazon.
It's the opposite.
Billionaires don't control jobs. They control their own property.
Anyone can create jobs: small business owners, entrepreneurs, investors, even self employed workers.
The irony is that "democratically deciding what we work on" would concentrate power in politics instead of dispersing it among millions of individuals.
@michaelevknight Everyone should work on what they want to given someone is willing to pay for that work. Democratically deciding what work to do means forcing everyone to work where assigned. A way worse scenario than the current one, even assuming it doesn't end in mass starvation like it will
It's the opposite.
Billionaires don't control jobs. They control their own property.
Anyone can create jobs: small business owners, entrepreneurs, investors, even self employed workers.
The irony is that "democratically deciding what we work on" would concentrate power in politics instead of dispersing it among millions of individuals.