If a senior lawyer-MP is so “ashamed” of living in India today, he should register that shame properly.
Resign from the Rajya Sabha.
Because shame cannot be selective.
Where was this 'national shame' in 2021, when Bengal saw brutal post-poll violence, when people were chased, killed, assaulted, displaced, and women were raped?
Where was this 'shame' when a BJP supporter was chased and killed in front of his own mother?
Where was the 'shame' when the Sandeskhali rape case happened?
Where was the 'shame' when the RG Kar rape case happened?
Where was this 'shame' when you appeared in Calcutta High Court to oppose these victims and resisted CBI transfer of the case?
Where was this constitutional anguish when the Calcutta High Court had to order a CBI probe into murder, rape and crimes against women because victims were crying for justice?
But of course an egg attack on a TMC leader suddenly shakes the soul of democracy.
But the blood, tears and terror of ordinary Bengal victims from 2021 did not produce the same moral thunder.
If you are ashamed of India, resign from the parliament.
If not, spare us the theatre.
This doesn’t come as a Surprise to us.. it’s so easy to character assassinate a dead woman… in most of the cases, they would say “not my baby” etc…
If they really had doubts, why didn’t they go for further genetic Testings???
Giribala was an influential person, getting such testing done wouldn’t be difficult for her
@yadavakhilesh गूँगा बोला, साहिबा। 15 साल से गूँगा था बेचारा जब TMC के गुंडे बीजेपी कार्यकर्ताओ को जान से मार रहे थे, जनता को लूट रहे थे, औरतों पर अत्याचार करते थे। आज कुछ थप्पड़ उसी जनता से और... गूँगा बोला, साहिबा। यह तो चमत्कार है।
@RahulGandhi@abbas_nighat माँ के पेट से सांसद का पद लेकर आया था?🤔
आम जनता ने बनाया था वही लतिया रही है, इसमें अचरज कैसा!
सांसद है मालिक नहीं, कृपया भ्रम से बाहर निकलो🙏🏼
I regard Rahul Gandhi as the very embodiment of vacuous grandstanding wrapped in dynastic entitlement — a political dilettante perpetually mistaking performative rhetoric for statesmanship. My first reaction is one of intellectual exasperation: a textbook case of “empty vessels making the loudest noise,” coupled with an astonishing talent for snatching confusion from the jaws of clarity.
He represents, to me, the triumph of pedigree over proficiency, verbosity over vision, and perpetual sanctimony over substantive political craftsmanship. A walking monument to inherited relevance in an age demanding earned credibility.