Surgeon and scientist. Eclectic. Disillusioned liberal...evolving libertarian? Not actually a statue nor a member of “statue twitter” — “lol give him some wine”
@jsin876@CartersPeanuts@DGlaucomflecken Are you fucking retarded? Why don’t you watch from about 0:10-0:18 on the video glauc linked before you make any more of a fool of yourself. And of course PCPs in the US handle basic gyn, Wtaf are you talking about? they have to refer out for diagnostic laparoscopy though.
Step 1: It's not really happening
Step 2: Yeah, it's happening, but it's not a big deal
Step 3: It's a good thing, actually
Step 4: People freaking out about it are the real problem
@Leesplez@JeffreyASachs@conor64@joperec Poorer student outcomes than what? It���s remarkable to set that high a bar when much of the DEI ideology is premised on diversity being a per se good. You’re uncomfortable with an a priori assumption that viewpoint diversity is good for higher ed?
@BrandonLBradfor Just post the essay, dipshit. That’s the answer. Everyone can see that “it’s done but it’s a secret” is bullshit. Everyone can see that “show me your face” is a non sequitur and cop out. Answer the question or stfu. Where’s the Sowell piece (that you now claim is complete)?
@ExerciseIn @BrandonLBradfor Btw, what field does one need expertise in to ask someone if they’ve completed their treatise on Sowell? I’ll tell you if I’m an expert there or not. Meanwhile, it’s back to elementary-level reading comprehension for you.
@ExerciseIn @BrandonLBradfor Ah yes, the polymaths of real estate. Many of them have even graduated attaining school, with a select few even obtained basic competence in…real estate. These are the people who should be weighing “outside their field”!
@BrandonLBradfor I WAS VERY SPECIFIC: your Sowell rebuttal. You replied that 1) it’s done but we can’t see it 2) but also you’re still working on it 3) your dog ate your homework 4) your girlfriend lives in Canada. Your fans may be this stupid, but your critics are not. Show work or stfu.
@homo_placidus @WillCJohn @pli_cachete No. I’m right. The version I’m of this solution that works includes additional information. You aren’t thinking about the game state as it actually begins. https://t.co/BrudFKzpBu
@homo_placidus @WillCJohn @pli_cachete IOW all players immediately see that step 1 of your iteration can’t work. The sync process breaks down. I found a version of this solution that works but critically it has an additional round of iteration that yields meta-information (n<=2). https://t.co/oxnh0Wtmu3
@homo_placidus @WillCJohn @pli_cachete IOW all players immediately see that step 1 of your iteration can’t work. The sync process breaks down. I found a version of this solution that works but critically it has an additional round of iteration that yields meta-information (n<=2). https://t.co/oxnh0Wtmu3
@homo_placidus @WillCJohn @pli_cachete Problem is, the game can’t actually unfold that way. At game start: 1) all three players immediately see two smudges 2) know that both other players see at least one smudge 3) know that if I/all are smudged, both other players see two smudges. There is no way to iterate from here
@BrandonLBradfor Every time with this delusion. “Come at me bro, I’ll crush you.” “Okay, here’s the argument.” “lol who are you, why would I spend my time?”
You keep issuing challenges that YOU back out from. If the guy with first right of dismantling your Sowell essays backed out, show work.
@BrandonLBradfor Because that’s why you would write a “needlessly thorough” debunking of a popular public intellectual, dipshit: for the benefit of people deceived by him. Don’t keep all your brilliance to yourself, kiddo; share your light with the world! 3.5 years on, check’s still in the mail.
@BrandonLBradfor Anywho maybe you were drunk when you responded because you didn’t say shit. If you’d like to try again choosing EITHER “been done for a while (but you can’t see it)” OR “still working on it,”I’ll be here. (Google “mutual exclusivity” for why this matters!) https://t.co/P8nJYFsb11
In college a dude once ran up to me, babbling excitedly about how he had unified physics. Thrilled as I was to meet the living heir of Einstein, I regret to inform you he now takes lithium and accepts his midwit status. I mention delusions of grandeur for no particular reason.
@BrandonLBradfor So glad you were able to work in a few of these before bed, what with your busy social calendar, all those friends and whatnot vying for your attention on this very special birthday. Truly we are blessed!
In college a dude once ran up to me, babbling excitedly about how he had unified physics. Thrilled as I was to meet the living heir of Einstein, I regret to inform you he now takes lithium and accepts his midwit status. I mention delusions of grandeur for no particular reason.
@BrandonLBradfor Because that’s why you would write a “needlessly thorough” debunking of a popular public intellectual, dipshit: for the benefit of people deceived by him. Don’t keep all your brilliance to yourself, kiddo; share your light with the world! 3.5 years on, check’s still in the mail.
So your dog ate it? You said you would publish it; it doesn’t matter if you let someone else see it for debate prep, if they backed out, POAST GOODS. This is like Trump saying he can’t disclose financials bc audit. Your audience is very stupid, but even they can see what this is.
One or two before bed
My dude that's been done for at least a year. It was in the hands of one of your conservative Black talking heads(I mock him publicly) on here, who wanted the chance to "dismantle it" first. Long/short, he backed out. Since then:
https://t.co/Oq32TVBxOU
“It’s been done for over year! But also I’m still working on it.” You are a very stupid man, Brandon. This is kettle logic. If you wanted to chip away at Sowell for life, you’re certainly allowed to do that. You are the one who promised a definitive rebuttal to his entire corpus.
I've worked on a few other folks "breakdowns/takedowns/refutes" of Sowell, and I've been convinced to start writing more personally as things shift. So I'll be posting mine, with a hopefully unique take, as I do more talks and write more during this election year.