If na African team play the Tucheliban style, dem go say na inferiority complex.
Bro gave up on the game and let the greatest footballer to ever touch a ball have all of it.
But hindsight is always 20/20.
If it worked, they'll call him a genius.
For those of you learning Forex from
him or people like him, the social capital assets he just listed here are actually his source of income. Influencing + your subscription money is actually how these your mentors make money.
Whether it's crypto or forex, make sure you have as much clout as they do, else your participation in the industry will continue to be a source of revenue for them, as against a poverty escape route for you.
One day, you trading โstudentsโ will finally understand that you are the actual customers for these Ponzi Schemers.
Most businesses don't lose international customers because of their product.
They lose them because getting paid is harder than it should be.
With our Multi-Currency Invoicing, you can invoice customers in their local currency.
There will never come a time when you stop feeling fondness for women as a man.
The reason is twofold:
You are part of the male species burdened with the biological imperative to reproduce.
Two, you were raised by a woman, and so at your most malleable developmental loop, developed a desire to please her in order to survive.
What experience does for a man is not to override these base instincts, but to cognitively superimpose on them.
You acknowledge that you like women, as every healthy man should,
But that you are not solely a slave to your biological desires, in transcending them cognitively when necessary.
That you believe you havenโt yet built sufficient ruthlessness tells me you havenโt suffered enough (yet).
The solution to maternal blue pill conditioning is constant contact with reality sufficient to trigger override.
That is to say in simpler terms, (quite ironically) that the solution to stop suffering with women, is to suffer more with them.
It is not less experience, but more experience.
You need to taste female ruthlessness deep in the core of your soul till you know ontologically that you will never tolerate it again.
โA wife should never pay house rent, a woman should never split the rent bills with her husband, that's the barest minimum a husband should provideโ
Solomon Buchi
Marriag is a partnership
1. But your 'partner' who does not have money will not partner with you if you do not have money
2. Your 'partner' who does not have an apartment will not partner with you if you do not have an apartment
3. Your 'partner' who does not have a car will not partner with you if you do not have a car
4. Your 'partner' who is incompetent, will not partner with you if you are incompetent
5. Your 'partner's' money belongs to her, but your money belongs to the partnership
6. As you pour your money into the partnership, your 'partner' is pouring hers into her own family
7. You are expected to also cook, and clean the baby's poo, but she is not expected to also debug code, edit your videos, prepare your proposals, respond to clients, run your ad campaigns, build financial models, forecast market movements, backtest your trading strategy, negotiate your deals, source your suppliers, or manage your employees.
8. When you do not have money to pour into the 'partnership', everyone questions your competence and disrespects you. When you have money, everyone praises your 'partner' for bringing peace, favour and good luck
9. Your 'partner' who does not have money to rent a good apartment, will make rules for you who has an apartment, inside the apartment YOU rented ๐ฉ
10. In that apartment that YOU rented, your 'partner' will impose a curfew on you and lock you out if you return home at a time she does not like ๐ญ
11. Before the partnership even begins, you are expected to propose, pay bride price, fund the wedding, rent/build the house, furnish it, buy the car, and bear the financial burden of starting the partnership, because apparently, this particular partnership requires one partner to provide the capital and the other to provide consent, prayers and vibes.
What a mouthwatering partnership for you. Gbefun!
It was definitely her idea not to entertain family for more than a week. If it was his own parent that died and his siblings needed a home to stay, the rule may not be revoked.
Rules like this is a blatant red flag. Only evil people make those rules. The silent part of the rule is usually "your family."
Until you date a generous and responsible woman, you will never understand how much women love spending on the man they love and being financially responsible to the family.
This is similar to what happened between a 35-year-old man and me last year before he eventually joined the people to start dragging me on X through Forex Influencers.
He came to me voluntarily because he wanted to learn how I trade, particularly how I traded gold.
Before the mentorship began, he praised my composure and knowledge. He told me that if certain people on X understood gold the way I did, everyone else would have to leave the internet for them.
He was so friendly and complimentary that he jokingly asked whether I needed a wife and said he could offer me two of his sisters, adding that his girlfriend could join them. That was the nature of our conversation before the refund dispute.
During the first week, he specifically asked whether the programme included one-on-one sessions or whether he would only have access to the videos. I confirmed that it included one-on-one sessions. I also instructed him to study the information inside the coaching group because it was important. Therefore, the programme included private sessions, the coaching group and access to the trade calls.
He responded that he was already going through the group, observing the phenominal performances and was ready for our private sessions whenever I was available. I told him that our sessions would take place on weekends, and he agreed.
About a week and a half later, he contacted me to confirm whether the trade calls group had become inactive and asked whether I had stopped it. I told him no.
When he later complained that he felt I had abandoned the engagement, I immediately proposed a call for the following morning. I asked him to number and prepare all his questions so that I could address them during the call.
He was the person who asked me to move the call to the weekend because he operated a business and said his customers might interrupt him. I agreed and again told him to prepare his questions. A little over a week later, he suddenly asked to cancel the mentorship and requested a refund.
Let me make this completely clear:
- He did not demand a refund because I could not trade.
- He did not demand a refund because I could not teach him.
- He did not claim that my trading performance was poor or that the mentorship lacked value.
His own messages show the exact opposite. He praised my knowledge, acknowledged the performances he was observing and repeatedly asked for one-on-one sessions with me.
The reason he gave for requesting a refund was that he had overleveraged his personal trading account while trying to raise money quickly, blew the account and became financially stranded.
Those were his own words.
He admitted that he was financially down, that the week had been unfavourable for him both on and off the charts, and that he had over-leveraged his account while trying to raise some money. He said he lost everything, had placed himself in a serious financial mess and had nobody or nowhere else to turn.
He told me that receiving the money back would go a long way in helping him. He even asked me to deduct whatever amount I considered fair for the time he had already spent receiving trade calls and participating in the coaching group.
Therefore, his refund request arose from the consequences of his own over-leveraging and financial hardship, not from any inability on my part to trade or teach. I told him that I had never refunded anyone. He then informed me that he had left both groups so he could think clearly.
About four weeks after coming to me, he reported me to a forex blog and demanded a refund. After everything, he later returned, apologised and asked me to understand him as a man. He admitted that he was broke and that his financial condition was the reason he demanded the refund.
I accepted his apology. We laughed about it, and I warned him never to do anything like that again. Yet, about two weeks later, the same man asked me to lend him $2,000, or at least $1,000.
I refused to lend him the money, but I still continued teaching him and gave him two additional lengthy sessions.
Several weeks later, he reported me again, this time to Forex Influencers. He deleted parts of our conversations, removed the surrounding context and presented himself to the public as an innocent victim.
The screenshots circulated on X did not show how highly he had praised my trading knowledge and performance. They did not show how friendly he had been, to the extent that he jokingly offered me two of his sisters and said his girlfriend could join.
They did not show that he had admitted blowing his trading account through overleveraging. They did not show that his refund request arose from his personal financial hardship rather than my ability to trade or teach.
They did not show that I offered him another call, that he personally requested that the call be moved to the weekend, or that I continued teaching him afterwards. They also did not show his apology or his subsequent request to borrow $2,000 or $1,000 from me.
Before you take sides, judge someone, or end a relationship, hear both sides of the story. The first person to speak is not always right.
Many people have created lifelong enemies because they believed one story too quickly. Do not let someone use you against an innocent person.
The public was only shown selected conversations. I had the complete record. Evidence is everything. Nothing beats evidence in this world.
Silence does not protect you; it gives people room to rewrite the story. You may have every receipt and choose not to speak, yet they will still paint you as the perpetrator.
Document everything. And when necessary, reveal everything.
Breaking: Your smart TV takes a screenshot of your screen twice every second and sells what it sees.
It is called ACR, and it has been running since you set the TV up.
Texas already sued over it. Here is how to turn it off in under 2 minutes:
CEOs are quietly realizing the AI replacement plan has a problem.
Two problems, actually.
One: the token costs for running AI agents are now exceeding what they were paying the employees they fired.
Two: when the tokens run out, the AI stops. Just stops. No continuity. No workaround. Just a spinning wheel where your workforce used to be.
You fired humans to save money and bought a subscription that bills you into a corner.
The employees you let go knew what to do when things broke.
The AI just invoices you for the outage.
And then thereโs the permission problem nobody wants to talk about.
To do its job, the AI agent needs access. Full access. Your systems, your patents, your contracts, your future plans. Everything you spent years building, handed over to a process that has no loyalty, no discretion, and no skin in the game.
You didnโt hire a replacement.
You gave a stranger with no soul the keys to everything you own.
Enjoy.
Despite producing double the cement Nigeria needs, three companies control the market and have hiked prices to 15,000 naira per bag, making home ownership an impossible dream for you.
The phone you're using now, you were once very anxious about getting it. How long did the excitement last after you got it?
Exactly.
That is how it is with everything you're anxious about. When you get it, epiphany hits. "So this is it?"