@PpollingNumbers A lot more nuance to this. Polymarket and UMA whales are arguing that he already lowered the tariffs on China which is why it's polling so high.
@Polymarket@UMAprotocol fwiw I still put most of the blame for this situation on Polymarket and UMA, but @Domahhhh's thread covers important context about how the Yes proposal was specifically timed to capitalize on anticipated negligence:
https://t.co/XhlyNBpEes
One of the most chaotic and corrupted prediction market resolutions happened earlier this week on a $7m market on Polymarket, with the aid of an UMA dispute.
Multiple bulwarks to prevent something like this from happening totally failed.
Let's call it a “Home Alone Attack.”
The attackers waited for the adults to leave, and moved in.
But in this version of the story, the idiot Wet Bandits bypassed all the booby traps and robbed the house. The profit was ~$200k for Harry & Marv, plus additional money for the rest of the crew.
Long thread⌛
@L334411 @EricdeL69 @Polymarket@0xPolygon NFTard Kiroku. They have already stated that they are not refunding, they took the money, I am not jumping to conclusions since I have all the information about the situation.
@L334411 @EricdeL69 @Polymarket@0xPolygon They facilitated it, and had about 3-4 opportunities to fix it before it happened and chose not to and after admitting their mistake, they decided to just say leave us feedback and issue no refunds. Obviously this is no accident, it's a big fucking mistake and should be called ou
🤺 New slash is live from @stellarobject1 who is slashing @Polymarket
“Continuing issue of negligent settlement of bets”
Join the conversation and help settle the slash here → https://t.co/wN4cZ9RdqH
A Ukraine-themed @polymarket contract suffered an UMA governance attack, but it wasn't a very profitable trading strategy. By @thesamreynolds
https://t.co/6yMyMz96jE