Aidan

chimken

[Jonjoeeeeeeeeee @Jonjoeeeeeeeeee]

6 year old console and the only game to fully utilize any of its features is Ratchet and Clank...

[ShyVortex 🇵🇸 @ShyVortex]

Fuck that OBS plugin bro this shit is insane

[Aidan @GrenadeCeption]

@ShyVortex THANK YOU for introducing me to this software bro. Holy fuck this has just completely overhauled how I'll be playing my PS5 and Switch 2. Using OBS feels so primitive when compared to this

[Ishan @Ishanv9hj]

Path traced Ridge Racer Type 4 PS1 game running on PC at 60fps. Video is a bit choppy since the VRR didn't translate well to a fixed 60fps video.

PS: X didn't like the patreaon link i shared earlier, so directly uploading the video again.

[Aidan @GrenadeCeption]

@systemadic @Top_Nach14 Exactly my thinking. It's fine if some people prefer the higher resolution over the frame rate, I just think that going from a smooth 60 to a choppy 30 can diminish my enjoyment and ruin immersion in some games, not in all, but in most for sure

[Aidan @GrenadeCeption]

Quality Mode = 30fps, Performance Mode = 60fps. This way everyone is happy and gets a choice of how they play

Default mode = 30fps. Nobody gets a choice and you have to live with it, people are rightfully disappointed and argue and now nobody's happy. Give us the choice at least

[Aidan @GrenadeCeption]

@SteveKaye84 By "taking away", I mean performance modes have become commonplace in bigger releases to cater for different preferences. I accept 60fps is unrealistic for GTA 6, but I feel 40fps should've been considered. 30fps can feel rough for me and many others in some games

[Aidan @GrenadeCeption]

@SN_Server @RenRyuzakiVT Honestly fair enough, I only have my own experiences to go by and I would like to say I am smart enough to get the most suitable monitor for the stuff I buy, but I imagine some people just see bigger number and buy without doing much research

[Aidan @GrenadeCeption]

@wlmturkey Bro I have a PC that I play on daily. I just can't play every game on there right away so I have a PS5 and a Switch 2 for console exclusives

[Aidan @GrenadeCeption]

@zakkinoff I feel like as a buyer of a console that boasts 4K 120Hz/8K 60Hz right on the front of the box, that a performance mode should be included in most if not all games, even if it isn't a flat doubling of the frame rate, but even a 10fps jump makes a big difference to clarity imo

[Aidan @GrenadeCeption]

@IxBeast_ I mainly play on PC, so I'm well aware of hardware limitations. I admit 60fps was definitely too much to expect from GTA 6, but I feel like 40fps should've been planned from the start. My point was about console games generally. You should give players the choice where possible.

[Aidan @GrenadeCeption]

@SteveKaye84 I don't understand how I'm entitled here. I have a clear preference that says I would prefer the choice of higher fidelity or higher performance, taking that away just tends to alienate a decent percentage of users imo. It's just a difference in opinion that's all

[Aidan @GrenadeCeption]

@SN_Server That's understandable. Experiencing that in the intended way is the preferred method for some. But like with users on PC when their games get released there, they would prefer to get extra performance should they want that. Imo, I feel like the having the option is important

[Aidan @GrenadeCeption]

@SN_Server @RenRyuzakiVT I agree to some degree. On a 60fps screen with no VRR, it would be rough experience for sure, but most people who can afford a PS5/XSX will have access to a 120hz TV or a display with VRR in some capacity which would make it a lot more bearable overall and improve the pacing

[Aidan @GrenadeCeption]

@BritByte83 @RenRyuzakiVT Don't just assume maybe? I know it looks better and will be far larger in scale to GTA 5, graphics aren't the only factor bro. I would gladly just prefer the option to have a performance mode that lowers certain things like view distance slightly even if it gained me 10~ fps

[Aidan @GrenadeCeption]

@elaphevulpina @RenRyuzakiVT Absolutely true. I'd be upset that they couldn't reach 60, sure, but I would at least be happy that they included the option to have more performance for those that wanted all they could get

[Aidan @GrenadeCeption]

@unclespinkle @RenRyuzakiVT I do understand that they want people to see their entire vision and that's why a quality mode should exist. If all these people are serious about not noticing the difference between 30 and 60 then the quality mode would be more popular anyway, but it still gives others an option

[Aidan @GrenadeCeption]

@brauntube582623 @RenRyuzakiVT Maybe not fully 60, sure, but I know for a fact that 40 would feel much better. Cyberpunk on my Switch 2 runs at 40 on performance and feels FAR better than 30, not perfect sure, but I'd rather take 10 more frames if I have the option

[Aidan @GrenadeCeption]

@Top_Nach14 I'm not really whining bro, just expressing an opinion as I am allowed to do as are you. Also, the argument of "you literally wouldn't know" is so false. I like many others can easily notice the difference between 30 and 60 and find 30 on a lot of games degrades my enjoyment

[Aidan @GrenadeCeption]

@RenRyuzakiVT I mean, you can change things like NPC density (might not work as well for online sure), but vegetation density and detail, physics quality or view distance also exist. Rockstar is a multi billion dollar company, surely they can optimise something. Even if it's 40fps they give us