5 of these men are my perpetrators that groomed and raped me from the age of 11 ….
It took an 10 year investigation with the NCA to finally get them to court and go to trial, all 5 was found guilty on all charges against me this was for the sexual assaults, rape and trafficking me around England.
They was found guilty in 2024 with sentencing ranging from 6 years to 25 years for the abuse they inflicted upon me.
The NCA said in their statement this was some of the most horrific and worse abuse they have investigated since the investigation started.
2 years later I’ve got a letter saying that their prison sentences could be cut by 33% and have early release!!!! How is that possible how can they do that to us survivors it’s like been let down all over again !!!
The Labour Party are happy to let some of the most dangerous monsters back on to our streets to further abuse more children!!!
I can’t make sense of it all that hard work and determination to get justice for it to be laughed at when in reality us survivors have the real sentence it’s a lifetime sentence and it’s not fair !!!
Restore Britain’s five step plan to end the welfare scam.
Number one.
No benefits for foreigners. Saves billions and billions every year. If a Somalian family is living on benefits in social housing funded by the British taxpayer, I wish them well. In Somalia. No discussion needed. Huge savings to be had.
Second.
The ballooning welfare bill is not solely down to foreign nationals, far from it. There are a huge number of British people taking the mick. The system is there for the taking, and they are doing exactly that. Claiming some disability or another, when there is evidently nothing wrong.
Face-to-face assessments are vital, regular and vigorous.
- Dedicated welfare fraud investigation units.
- Proper data-sharing between HMRC, DWP and local authorities.
- Automatic recovery of fraudulent claims from future earnings.
And actually through doing this, we can give proper support to those British men and women who genuinely need it. A fair, robust and compassionate approach.
Third.
A life on benefits for a healthy individual is NOT acceptable. If you can work, you must work. A few months to find a desired job is reasonable, but after that - if you want your benefit money, you will be put to work.
That is Restore Britain’s position.
Litter picking, street cleaning, gardening, scraping chewing gum off the pavement. Whatever. If it needs doing and you want the money, you’re doing it.
Random drug tests for those on benefits - if you’re getting high, the benefits stop.
Tough love.
Next.
Reintroduce the two child cap. Hardworking British parents shouldn’t have to subsidise indolence.
If you want more children, get a job.
Finally.
Tax cuts.
Raise the thresholds. Make it so that going back to work is financially rewarding. Obviously. Reward hard work, and people will do more of it. If people feel like going into work is actually worth it, they will do it. It must never pay to sit on benefits.
More training, more apprenticeships. A skilled and active workforce. Contributing, not taking. That is what we need.
A Restore Britain Government will ensure no household receives more in out-of-work benefits than the equivalent working family earns after tax.
The welfare system should protect those who cannot work, support those who fall on hard times, and help people back into employment as quickly as possible.
It should never be more attractive than work.
Restore Britain will reward contribution and ambition, not indolence and entitlement.
End the welfare scam, slash the bill, crush inflation.
Oh for fuck’s sake give it a rest…
Brexit was FACTUALLY a de minimis footnote (I voted remain in 2016 so don’t even start…) when compared with a raft of the worst policy decisions imaginable since the end of WW2 across virtually all policy areas, by fuckwit politicians…
To name some of the biggest offenders:
- Most expensive energy in the developed world fuelling inflation across every good and service going - and net zero cultish insanity crippling our economy; we now make virgin steel only via emergency nationalisation in all but name - mainly because windmills and solar don’t produce the joules to produce concrete or steel, to build stuff
- Shuttering North Sea oil whilst buying the same stuff from the Norwegians who banked the oil: two trillion in the tank, three hundred grand a head, a quarter of the budget paid forever
- PFI. Blair and Brown fancied hospitals that didn’t trouble the books, so they put them on tick with loan sharks. £60b of buildings, £300b out the door, NHS still paying through the nose for a car park and a leaky roof.
- Tories borrowed the best part of £400bn at 0%, the cheapest money in three hundred years, and what have we got for it? Furlough, a fortune in PPE that didn’t work, and ~£20b handed to chancers with fake ltd co’s. Nothing built. Nothing that pays you back. The lot, gone. And here’s the one nobody says out loud… Money was free. Risk free. Rates at zero for the best part of a fucking decade. If a govt or their perm secs had any sense that was the moment to issue a 30y infra bond and build the grid, the reactors, the track, the housing, lock the cost in at basically nothing and let it pay for itself for two generations. Norway would’ve had it done by lunch. We didn’t issue a penny of it. Now the long end’s at 5.5 and the door’s now bolted shut. We had the cheapest money in history and spaffed it all.
- Capital markets that don’t work since Blair and Brown’s various legislative and regulatory changes, making pension fund allocations lower going into British companies, and making it harder and more costly to raise capital to grow and keep businesses here paying taxes and employing people - the collective cost of this to British households is conservatively estimated to be around £20trillion (per @andyroocraig’s figures) and countries that were literally communist within living memory are on track to overtake us this decade, on the IMF’s own numbers. Oh, and Mississippi HAS already overtaken us on GDP per capita basis (they are the butt of all poverty jokes in the US)
- Brown flogged 395 tonnes of gold, over half the national reserve, in 17 auctions between 1999 and 2002, at about $275 an ounce, near a twenty-year structural low. They call it “Brown’s Bottom” for a reason. Pocketed $3.5b but I t’d be worth around $52b today. So that socialist genius cleared the lot at the bottom of the market and torched the thick end of £40b in one decision (because he like many politicians since the 90s is a retard with no real world understanding)
- P90/P10 wage compression under social democracy is demonstrably worse than even the Soviets managed under Gosplan ffs
- Selling off and sweating various other national assets to fund our absurd debt borrowing pile that has mostly been spaffed up the wall on zero return or loss making initiatives / welfare socialism etc
- Series of the worst trade deals imaginable (pre and post Brexit)
- Too much of people’s money tied up in the resi property Ponzi scheme doing nothing (other than now: losing value in realtime)
- Planning laws that stop anyone building infrastructure on housing
I could go on…
Plus we have rising long yields now, which are (TL;DR) the price of having destroyed your own structural buyer base and then issuing into the gap while the central bank sells on top. Brexit doesn’t appear anywhere in that mechanism either.
So, this creepy obsession you have with Brexit is weird, lame and entirely worn out.
Bin.
���
Last night, of 487 “rainbow coalition” MPs just 4 voted against using children as Guinea pigs.
Well done to the 3 Labour and 1 Lib Dem who put children’s safety above trans ideology.
For the rest of the Labour, Lib, Green and SNP, you have betrayed our duty of care to minors. You have failed the most vulnerable.
Shame on you.
We all know it's true, but particularly horrific to read it in a formal parliamentary answer to one of my questions.
"Asylum seekers have access to NHS healthcare from their point of arrival in the UK. They are entitled to the same level of treatment as UK nationals"
DEPORT.
You can run with this premise and the conclusion remains absurd.
The UK has rapidly decarbonised already. It has made no difference, because the UK's share of carbon emissions was already statistically insignificant — which is only becoming more true over time.
We could hit Net Zero. We could hit negative carbon. Nothing would change, because China and India exist, and they do not give a damn about our political gestures.
(This is evidenced by their emissions increasing almost as quickly as our political gestures have proliferated, and over the same timeframe.)
No amount of decarbonisation in the UK will make any difference to summer temperatures. This is not an ethical or an ideological point - I like the environment, I dislike excessive heat - it is a mathematical one.
All it does is make us poorer and less able to adapt to the new reality.
A policy of increasing carbon emissions would, paradoxically, improve our climate resilience, because we'd be able to afford basic infrastructure like air conditioning while adding nothing of note to global emissions.
The only reason this is not widely accepted is that political environmentalism is a virtue cult. It has no interest in climate science, it has no interest in tangible outcomes, it is entirely concerned with allowing mediocrities to play act saving the world.
If you have been elected as an MP and in effect refuse to take the oath by making it clear you don't mean it, then your election should be deemed illegitimate and the by election re run. No other country would allow this mockery of its own constitution.
Why not simply pick one of the Labour MPs with extensive business or finance experience, preferably both?
Oh wait...... there are no Labour MPs like that. Because no one who understands business or economics is a socialist.
I don't remember a single case where a grooming gang predator was caught because they were turned in by a wife, a cousin, a fellow mosque member who found out what they were up to, anyone from within "the community". Did it ever happen?
If you want to get a glimpse at the worst anarcho-tyranny in the Western world, look to Britain through the lens of the Grooming Gangs report and Clarkson's Farm
On one hand, the police actively aided Pakistanis in abusing hundreds of thousands of little British girls, and otherwise did nothing to help those girls or stop the abusers
On the other, a gentleman farmer will face a ruthless bureaucracy bent on stopping him from engaging in any productive activity. From national badger protections to local refusals to let him build a parking lot or restaurant, the entire apparatus is arranged against a man trying to follow the law and rebuild his community
That is by design
Keir Starmer's successor, whoever that will be, will fail just like he did.
The United Kingdom is ungovernable at this point because the elected government no longer controls the state apparatus. The unholy blob that Tony Blair constructed runs everything, and they answer to no one. Starmer himself literally said that he pulls a lever and nothing happens. His replacement will find those levers still do nothing.
Without a massive purge of the NGOs, the Quangos, the courts, the civil service, and the administrative state, changing Prime Ministers will do about as much good as swapping out a kid's steering-wheel toy in a car that's hurdling off a cliff.
Starmer, a lawyer, has already decided it's a guilty verdict and given a motive too. He's also decided on the harshness of the sentence too as if 'guilty' is a foregone conclusion.
And there was me thinking this is what a jury and a judge is for.
And silly old me. The whole premise of English common law is everybody is presumed innocent unless and until they're found guilty.
Maybe someone should tell Starmer. The lawyer. 🙄
If you know what to look for, it's really easy to spot. Grievance politics. Muslims are predominantly responsible for rape gangs and terrorist attacks in this country.
But rather than apologising for these atrocities, condemning them, or fixing them within their own communities, they ignore it, brush it off, and then act outraged when anything happens to them.
They're always the victims. And they're always preying on your better nature to sympathise with them regardless of the circumstances.
They always want more protections for themselves via beefed up definitions of Islamophobia and harsher restrictions for you with more punishing hate speech laws.
It's always self-interest for them and disregard for anyone else. They're entirely selfish and self-absorbed. And we simply don't have to keep tolerating it.
Muslim attacks white people:
Perpetrator’s identity usually not released until it can no longer be avoided, followed by calls for calm, not a racial incident, don't politicise the attack, avoid divisive rhetoric, mental health issues, no speculating on the motive, hope not hate, don't look back in anger, Islamophobia is the real problem and we must do everything we can to protect our Muslim communities.
White person attacks Muslims:
'White man' identified within hours, motivated by anti-Muslim hatred, full force of the law, zero tolerance, fuelled by far right political parties, Islamophobia is the real problem and we must do everything we can to protect our Muslim communities.
There is only one aspect of the reaction from our politicians and our mainstream media which is consistent.
The allegation, which is very credible, that 250,000 girls were raped, sodomized, and violently abused with bottles, poles, and other instruments, is rightly making people angry with Muslim enclaves in the United Kingdom.
No, we should not endorse vigilante justice. But you know what encourages vigilante justice? When a people know they can no longer rely on the arm of the government to carry out this justice. That is when they take it into their own hands.
So you continually calling for the ongoing cover-up of these crimes by your people is what is contributing to this.
If you want it to stop, you ensure that every Muslim rapist and terrorist and attacker feels the full weight of the law and nothing is ever covered up again.
If you can’t do that, then no one cares about your crocodile tears.
Don't look back in anger.
I hope this man gets the mental health care he needs.
Don't blame all white people, terrorism has no race.
White natives are the most vulnerable right now. Protect them from anti-white backlash and uplift those facing extreme poverty and marginalisation in Britain.
Beware the far left politicising this. We need unity, not division.
Britain has a huge knife crime problem. Labour must restrict knives.
What terrifies me about this is the potential backlash against peaceful white people. Imagine if Muslims started mass-murdering Germans at Christmas markets, raping English teenage girls, stabbing Irish schoolchildren, or blowing up cars in Sweden?
During Stalin’s Show Trials, one of the charges against the defendants was that they’d read subversive material, which of course was illegal and punishable by death.
But this posed a problem for the judges: even if it was only to confirm that it was indeed subversive material, reading said material was still dangerous. And so, on the margins next to the evidence of subversive material, the judges would pencil in "Did not read but disapprove."
Just as bees make beehives, leftists reinvent Stalinism from first principles every time they are allowed to have power.
@HumzaYousaf For decades that attitude, the way you deliberately phrased that post to blame me for such unacceptable violence, helped to enable the mass rape of vulnerable white young girls by gangs of mainly Pakistani Muslims.
It won't work anymore, Humza.