@zolz98 If you're trying to ragebait, your statement should atleast be party accurate, low iq argument is a much better way to ragebait Norris fans for example, because it holds some validity.
@_derBlitz@DNFormula@F1 the thing is that he was just covering, probably not realising just how huge the closing speed was. that's a consequence of the rules.
@paulsaladinomd@cremieuxrecueil I think of it pretty simply, these oils are prone to oxidation, and are proven to do it already at storage. I don't think anyone can argue that oxidized fats are healthy to eat. Now I don't know if this oxidation is significant enough to actually matter, but I'll stick to tallow.
@ThomasMhl2@wearetherace@f1janneb@F1 War in the middle-east is not exactly uncommon, as long as the areas are deemed safe, it's probably business as usual.
@AgnesWold@DonRichardo66 Idén kommer troligtvis från att högt blodtryck är väldigt starkt kopplat till insulinnivå. Och de som har högt insulin är mer troliga att vara överviktiga, även om det även finns dem som har högt insulin, utan uppenbar övervikt.
@f1janneb Vill bara uttrycka att jag gillar motogp poddens format som har via patreon, det betalar jag så gladerligt, men är dyrt att betala podme för endast eran podd. Men kul att jag kommer kunna lyssna iallafall n��nting av er igen, det uppskattas.
@RS73193748@RBR_Daily I mean, how do you know that RB is now fastest and earlier was marginally slower? If he only won when his teammate finished p2 then you would have an argument.
@NathanBrzo84396@seanallen_dev@F1 I think either way you are at risk at that point, with cars behind coming in hot. But for sure he could've been more self-preservative.