One of the absolute killers of productivity in programming (and most other disciplines) is too much overlap between people's work. The highest velocity teams are doing mostly independent streams of work with infrequent, well defined points to combine the results.
Friends.
Regarding the clear defamation of me by @nicolelampert in The Telegraph, complaints can be made directly to [email protected]
If they don't fix it, then we can complain to the regulator.
Much thanks xx
The nascent HTML-in-Canvas API is exciting to me not for flashy effects, but because it extends the semantics that the DOM can (tractably) represent — tiny example: it's possible to show an element in multiple places, cheaply, under arbitrary transforms.
https://t.co/tiqLQ95LOu
Une journaliste : ciblée. Des secouristes : ciblés.
La barbarie quotidienne.
Nous voyons. Nous savons. Nous disons. Nous répétons.
Mais Macron ré-examinera "le moment venu" l'accord d'association entre l'UE et Israël.
Vivrai-je assez vieux pour les voir rendre des comptes ?
Let me rant a bit more about this.
This is Crabs In a Bucket: The Comic. People share this every time someone tries to make something good. “Oh, that will obviously fail, because other people have made shitty versions of that thing. I am very wise.”
What is the point? Everything that is good was inspired by past things. The first version of the thing is never the good version. “Oh, mobile phones will never take off, because we’ve tried mobile phones and no one likes them.”
I have very little patience for status quo defenders. Is the software good, or isn’t it? If it’s not good, why aren’t we making something better? “Oh, people have tried to make better things, and it always fails.” Nonsense. The entire field of software is like 80 years old. Basically nothing has been tried. Why should we discourage people from innovating? From trying things they’re excited about? What does that achieve on literally any level?
If someone you know is excited about building something new, and you share this comic to shut them down, shame on you. You are actively preventing people from making better software.
Voilà, ça y est : notre émission est en ligne ! Dialogue de Jean-Luc Mélenchon et Frédéric Lordon - près de 3h de discussion entre le stratège et le théoricien... A voir sur Hors-Série (lien en commentaire).
1. Excited to be launching the Center for Law and the Economy @ColumbiaLaw with @LevMenand. The Center will focus on pressing questions of economic governance and help train the next generation of scholars and policy leaders.
https://t.co/wpc6RwjaJK
One reason I care so much about mathematical development is that math is unusually powerful when paired with something else.
Math + engineering
Math + physics
Math + economics
Math + computer science
...
The combination is worth far more than either domain in isolation.
Adult learners often talk about how we've helped them overcome childhood math trauma.
These learners had bad experiences in math education & are carrying old prerequisite gaps.
When those gaps are repaired, material that once felt impossible can feel surprisingly simple.
I like this movie very much, because it was very clever in what it was challenging excellent work. Im not convinced either that he 100% killed himself.
But I do think ppl are really unkind to anxious/needy partners on screen, it awakens the abuse impulse. Thats why they like her
should be a national emergency just how much these liberal talk shows are continuously making millions of american’s gleefully incurious and belligerently infantile politically. just a tragedy that this is the source that millions of people are relying on to stay informed