Inside Job, or deals made with the "exploiters".
A peanut recovery will be made (theatre), while the majority has already been pocketed.
How exactly does your private key get compromised?
...And the donkeys just lap it up.
We've detected a security incident involving the compromise of private keys belonging to a member of the Humanity Foundation. As a precaution, please do not interact with the bridge or any liquidity pools until we confirm it's safe.
We're already working with security experts and our exchange partners on resolution. We're deeply sorry — protecting this community is our responsibility, and we'll keep you updated every step of the way.
There's still time to follow me: small accounts respect the Power Law.
Zcash was not *suddenly* exploited, nor did the market *suddenly* dump.
Retribution was willed into the simulation by Pareto.
Prices and charts are meaningless: what matters is the inequality ratio.
Getting a little frothy in the bottom distribution (many).
When people start smack talking Bitcoin / Ether, it's never a good sign. That means there's too many on the boat.
Don't confuse the present for the future.
________ should be supported in USB mode, not just QR. Don't particularly like them, but there are use cases
- Avoid spamming your referral link on the main wallet screen. Can be a small notif instead. (I can explain why referring people to the weaker security product is a sin)
- Mobile App (avoid f-droid repo). Google Play + Apple App Store
- Hide the literal whos on the token display. Ether on Mainnet should be shown only
And,
https://t.co/7TQHYAw4aQ
I have mentioned ad nauseum: privacy is a tool, not an investment.
Privacy is only needed at the onramp and offramp stage. Why would you hold it in the middle like some donkey? You're not "more private", and there's opportunity cost. It would have saved you a -25% drawdown today too.
As for security vulnerabilities, they can affect any blockchain so it's not fair to isolate @Zcash. The privacy technology is fine; @RAILGUN_Project and @TornadoCash use zk-SNARKs too.
People generally have an issue with the history of Zcash, which is quite different from this New Age Zcash (they've improved).
There remains metadata leakage with Z to T / T to Z, as well as no network-layer privacy like Dandelion++ (inb4 muh Tor)
Monero offers stronger PRACTICAL privacy for all users, especially with the upcoming FCMP++. The ecosystem is also more fleshed out as it predates Zcash. And it is easier to "mess up" your privacy with user error on Zcash.
And finally game theory of the unknown: open-source does not mean secure. Bugs sit undiscovered for years in some of the largest open-source projects. Today is a perfect example pertaining to Zcash. You assume that people will spot vulnerabilities, every time.
Bitcoin & Ethereum have moats (nothing else does), with the strongest security guarantees while remaining decentralized. You wouldn't be able to organize a network upgrade with all the miners and exchanges over the weekend...
Then, there's a large cohort that find sketchy: the embrace of Zcash on CEXes with an institutional nod, while Monero remains delisted and is widely adopted in the DNMs where freedom is gambled.
All privacy development is good (from all teams), this industry definitely needs it. It is abnormal to broadcast your entire financial history to the world.
I have mentioned ad nauseum: privacy is a tool, not an investment.
Privacy is only needed at the onramp and offramp stage. Why would you hold it in the middle like some donkey? You're not "more private", and there's opportunity cost. It would have saved you a -25% drawdown today too.
As for security vulnerabilities, they can affect any blockchain so it's not fair to isolate @Zcash. The privacy technology is fine; @RAILGUN_Project and @TornadoCash use zk-SNARKs too.
People generally have an issue with the history of Zcash, which is quite different from this New Age Zcash (they've improved).
There remains metadata leakage with Z to T / T to Z, as well as no network-layer privacy like Dandelion++ (inb4 muh Tor)
Monero offers stronger PRACTICAL privacy for all users, especially with the upcoming FCMP++. The ecosystem is also more fleshed out as it predates Zcash. And it is easier to "mess up" your privacy with user error on Zcash.
And finally game theory of the unknown: open-source does not mean secure. Bugs sit undiscovered for years in some of the largest open-source projects. Today is a perfect example pertaining to Zcash. You assume that people will spot vulnerabilities, every time.
Bitcoin & Ethereum have moats (nothing else does), with the strongest security guarantees while remaining decentralized. You wouldn't be able to organize a network upgrade with all the miners and exchanges over the weekend...
Then, there's a large cohort that find sketchy: the embrace of Zcash on CEXes with an institutional nod, while Monero remains delisted and is widely adopted in the DNMs where freedom is gambled.
All privacy development is good (from all teams), this industry definitely needs it. It is abnormal to broadcast your entire financial history to the world.
I have mentioned ad nauseum: privacy is a tool, not an investment.
Privacy is only needed at the onramp and offramp stage. Why would you hold it in the middle like some donkey? You're not "more private", and there's opportunity cost. It would have saved you a -25% drawdown today too.
As for security vulnerabilities, they can affect any blockchain so it's not fair to isolate @Zcash. The privacy technology is fine; @RAILGUN_Project and @TornadoCash use zk-SNARKs too.
People generally have an issue with the history of Zcash, which is quite different from this New Age Zcash (they've improved).
There remains metadata leakage with Z to T / T to Z, as well as no network-layer privacy like Dandelion++ (inb4 muh Tor)
Monero offers stronger PRACTICAL privacy for all users, especially with the upcoming FCMP++. The ecosystem is also more fleshed out as it predates Zcash. And it is easier to "mess up" your privacy with user error on Zcash.
And finally game theory of the unknown: open-source does not mean secure. Bugs sit undiscovered for years in some of the largest open-source projects. Today is a perfect example pertaining to Zcash. You assume that people will spot vulnerabilities, every time.
Bitcoin & Ethereum have moats (nothing else does), with the strongest security guarantees while remaining decentralized. You wouldn't be able to organize a network upgrade with all the miners and exchanges over the weekend...
Then, there's a large cohort that find sketchy: the embrace of Zcash on CEXes with an institutional nod, while Monero remains delisted and is widely adopted in the DNMs where freedom is gambled.
All privacy development is good (from all teams), this industry definitely needs it. It is abnormal to broadcast your entire financial history to the world.
Ready for the SSS Tier Alpha?
Pareto does not take kindly to mockery. Exploits, flush events, or splitting the sky in two, converge to a singular goal to restore inequality (not a typo).
$ZEC bros were getting a little too uppity with their "muh private bitcoin", and summoned divine thunder unto themselves.
BTC • ETH • USD
Slavery will continue.
https://t.co/PQUEsK90SB
>@hyperbridge "can't be hacked"
>gets hacked
>deletes tweet
The Viceroy warned you. Pareto does NOT take kindly to mockery.
> "but you have 300 followers"
Exactly. The highest possible signal on CT.
All your heroes are dead. Their lifeless bodies float by me.
- UNDEFEATED
I have mentioned ad nauseum: privacy is a tool, not an investment.
Privacy is only needed at the onramp and offramp stage. Why would you hold it in the middle like some donkey? You're not "more private", and there's opportunity cost. It would have saved you a -25% drawdown today too.
As for security vulnerabilities, they can affect any blockchain so it's not fair to isolate @Zcash. The privacy technology is fine; @RAILGUN_Project and @TornadoCash use zk-SNARKs too.
People generally have an issue with the history of Zcash, which is quite different from this New Age Zcash (they've improved).
There remains metadata leakage with Z to T / T to Z, as well as no network-layer privacy like Dandelion++ (inb4 muh Tor)
Monero offers stronger PRACTICAL privacy for all users, especially with the upcoming FCMP++. The ecosystem is also more fleshed out as it predates Zcash. And it is easier to "mess up" your privacy with user error on Zcash.
And finally game theory of the unknown: open-source does not mean secure. Bugs sit undiscovered for years in some of the largest open-source projects. Today is a perfect example pertaining to Zcash. You assume that people will spot vulnerabilities, every time.
Bitcoin & Ethereum have moats (nothing else does), with the strongest security guarantees while remaining decentralized. You wouldn't be able to organize a network upgrade with all the miners and exchanges over the weekend...
Then, there's a large cohort that find sketchy: the embrace of Zcash on CEXes with an institutional nod, while Monero remains delisted and is widely adopted in the DNMs where freedom is gambled.
All privacy development is good (from all teams), this industry definitely needs it. It is abnormal to broadcast your entire financial history to the world.
Strong gusts of estrogen on the timeline.
Whole ass, grown ass men. You have no business being in crypto.
I can smell your laggard entries through my monitor.
Sell and lock in your losses; Pareto is on the hunt.