Half

1/2

[Half @Half__86]

.

[Charlie Kirk @charliekirk11]

@EndWokeness Dodged a lot of bullets this past year.

[Half @Half__86]

@andreasmadogs @Cynxetic @OzzyAussieOtty ok, so now we are just saying they must be lying caues the chart doesnt show what you thought it showed... awesome lol

you're coping now guy. cant and wont engage with that lol.

im sorry you didnt read the study fully

[Half @Half__86]

@andreasmadogs @OzzyAussieOtty christ now your multi-posting...

for the 4th(?) time, 3a and 3b are NOT THE HEAT MAP. The heat map is the same chart used for the question, but the parameters were set with overlapping rungs.

The study SPECIFICALLY points out this is where the heatmap comes from.

[Half @Half__86]

@andreasmadogs @Cynxetic @OzzyAussieOtty Again... that chart was used for multiple questions, HOWEVER the "heatmap" everyone posts is from THIS PART.

Just READ lol. It specifically says "the heat map was created from this question here"

[Half @Half__86]

@andreasmadogs @OzzyAussieOtty god forbid you keep reading and scroll down lol

[Half @Half__86]

@andreasmadogs @Cynxetic @OzzyAussieOtty sigh... again, you didnt read. the heatmap does not depict 3a or 3b. scroll down and keep reading lol. sheesh

[Half @Half__86]

@Cynxetic @andreasmadogs @OzzyAussieOtty he walked it back btw, he knows now it doesnt show what he thought it does in the heat map but he's coping. 100 bucks says down the road he's still going to misrepresent that heat map lol https://t.co/U0hxTpeVWR

[Andrew Matthews @andreasmadogs]

In the spirit of good faith, I'll agree that I misinterpreted the heat map as the resource pool test. You are correct that the heatmap displays a single click test distribution.

That doesn't solve your problem though in asserting the nature of the second test being an opportunity for total inclusivity.

Worse yet, the click map was the follow-up question, meaning the experience of the limited resource pool has some effect experientially that cannot be ruled out as marginal without deeper testing rhetoric.

Moreover, it says nothing to the interpretation that by not including the outer rings in a framework, you are indicating a willingness to sacrifice such things as morally inconsequential, making the intensity of the claim to more central elements that much stronger (correlating very well with the limited point pool test prior).

A participant can claim to possess a universally inclusive morality, but that doesn't mean it's truthful to the underlying moral framework they actually possess. Very curious to see the extent of task 2 if the question pertained to ethics.

[Half @Half__86]

@andreasmadogs @OzzyAussieOtty i did read it. its why i was able to show you you had no idea what the heat map actually showed lol

[Half @Half__86]

@andreasmadogs @OzzyAussieOtty not reading past show more

dont care. my issue is you didnt know what the heatmap said and i corrected you. if you want to whine about libs caring too much go elsewhere lol

you're coping now.

[Half @Half__86]

@big_fat_nick @north0fnorth Her insurance had to pay over 1,200 for my rental the past month.

Its good to be a good driver so that when accidents happen its not your fault :D

[Half @Half__86]

@andreasmadogs @OzzyAussieOtty i still aint reading past show more.

i added context, i showed you misunderstood what the heat map was showing. that's all i care about right here.

[Half @Half__86]

@komandaerwin @SeptonFratelli yeah, some of the stuff she talks about its wild how deep they went. One of the things i like is how even for minor characters/stories they dug deep into the myths so that even if its not a 1:1 it still follows the flow and logic of the myths. She also reads the runes in game.

[Half @Half__86]

@andreasmadogs @OzzyAussieOtty I never said they did not also assign weight, im saying the heatmap was NOT that part of the study you think it is. The heatmap is a simple "extent" with overlapping levels.

[Half @Half__86]

@SeptonFratelli She originally did a video for "Gamology" that got 3.1 million views and she was interested enough that she then reacted to BOTH games and was able to dive deeper into the story and lore since just clips on Gamology lacked context https://t.co/J3STDO4d3t

[Half @Half__86]

@andreasmadogs @OzzyAussieOtty you area reading it wrong, thats not what the heat map is showing. The heat map shows the results of the supplemental note 4 survey. 3a and 3b are not the same as the heatmap. Its the same "chart" but different instructions.

You are confusing 2 different parts of the survey.

[Half @Half__86]

@andreasmadogs @OzzyAussieOtty holy wall of text, pal this is twitter, not reddit

i aint reading all that lol

[Half @Half__86]

@andreasmadogs @OzzyAussieOtty its context because the study makes no claim at all here about level of care, but tons of conservatives keep thinking it does. The study simply says "do you care if harm is done to these things" which should be a no brainer, but i guess to conservatives its not.

[Half @Half__86]

@GreenThumbDrew @OzzyAussieOtty No dummy, its inclusive up to that point, so everything below it still is cared about. God forbid you take 3 mins to read the study. And yes, i do care if harm is done to these "rocks". I remember when conservatives used to care about conservation.

[Half @Half__86]

@andreasmadogs @OzzyAussieOtty The study does not assign level of care, just that you care.

Its not saying you care MORE about a stranger, just that you do at all.

[Half @Half__86]

@OzzyAussieOtty Its not empathy. This was how it was defined in the survey "By moral circle, we mean the circle of people or other entities for which you are concerned about right and wrong done toward them"