@kuddleETH @KeykeygirlA@Quan_follwers It quite literally and specifically only applies sometimes. Do you think the government beat this woman's ass or something?
@jenny2x4 I do not for one second believe this is a real job that needs doing or that it was necessary for him to be A) shirtless and B) covered head to toe in mud
@sept1_ken@Ben_Colwell18@Canucks I didn't say he only had one cup. I said he built one cup winner. He was instrumental in the 2006 Hurricanes. The 2016 and 2017 Penguins were not built by him.
@Bnudd @paulpanix @Canucks@NHL They may be able to turn it around, but time will tell. They have absolutely no prospect depth either, so letting picks go is a bizarre decision. Even if they build a contender quickly they'll have trouble plugging injury holes.
@sept1_ken@Ben_Colwell18@Canucks What are you even talking about? No one is talking about the Oilers and Leafs. I'm saying Rutherford didn't build the '16 and '17 Penguins teams because the pieces were already there.
@1fanCanucks@Canucks And getting Bedard is literally the only way this trade isn't a huge mistake. Knowing the Canucks the Isles' pick will move to next year and they'll completely tank and win the lottery, giving Detroit the 1st overall.
@GoldenMisfits @popolfajilan @TheLoneRaider@Canucks The problem for me with this trade is they're nowhere near competing without 5 or 6 more moves. If they barely squeak into the playoffs and get stomped and Detroit picks up a blue chip prospect and a solid NHLer with those picks will you be happy? I won't.
@Bnudd @paulpanix @Canucks@NHL Unless they somehow find a way to move OEL, Myers, and several middling wingers for decent return they're at least 4-5 years away from competing. That's why the Miller signing was a bonehead move too.
@Bnudd @paulpanix @Canucks@NHL I know what the team's plan is and it's a bad one. They can want that but they're not two years away from competing. They have too many holes to fill and too much dead weight taking up cap space.
@JustinDymond4@Canucks Yeah, you're right, it's fine because they were either going to get a 15th or 16th overall pick in the deepest draft in a decade or a completely unprotected pick next year. Depending on who Detroit gets with this pick it could be one of the worst trades in Canucks history.
@TechCarlo@Canucks I'm with you. This is an insane move unless they have a move on the horizon for another 1st rounder. The only way this doesn't have a negative impact is if they win the draft lottery.
@a_klipz @paulpanix @Canucks@NHL It's a conditional first that, barring a major slide in the standings, was going to be 15th or 16th overall. In this draft that's worth a top 10 pick in any other year.