@laurenboebert Gender is first and foremost a linguistic construct. It seperates all things into typically four groups (masculine, feminine, common, and nueter).
@godsservant3377 @katmrowr @llpatriot6 @MCN_2890@laurenboebert And her explanation didn't produce a third option for describing the jurists.
They still would fall into the two groups.
listen she doesn't need you to come to her defense.
she blocked me I will move on now.
Good luck.
@godsservant3377 @katmrowr @llpatriot6 @MCN_2890@laurenboebert If you don't think the charges should be brought then you don't thing the arrest should happen.
By definition.
So she attacks the jurists.
How is this so hard to understand?
The universe is causal.
Her statement implies an outcome and yet she refused to acknowledge that.
@godsservant3377 @katmrowr @llpatriot6 @MCN_2890@laurenboebert If a person asks me a question I will try to answer it.
She just didn't want to admit that her statement meant that she thought the jurists were a bunch of useful idiots doing the bidding of the real criminals.
@JigarataEats@PYeetimus@LeftistPat@NotAQidiot@charliekirk11 We cannot communicate without first agreeing on the meaning of words.
And gender has a scientific definition and so does trans and the words are used to describe a social phenomenon in social sciences.
That you want to use it differently doesn't change the meaning.
@EttelJohn@Cernovich That a person with covid delivers enough of the virus to infect another person by deflecting, and dispersing some of the virus they cannot help but expel.
And that study also doesn't support your claim (that there are risks doesn't mean the risks outweigh the benefits)
@EttelJohn@Cernovich A single COVID capsid is not enough to get the disease.
You need a large enough viral load to get sick.
In your analogy, some rice will deflect, some will alter trajectory and spread out, and some will pass right through.
The point of the mask is to make it less likely...
@EttelJohn@Cernovich And even if it did more harm than good, if the harm done was to me and the good done was for you, I would still gladly choose to mask up.
After all you provide a great deal for me; it is the least I could do.
@EttelJohn@Cernovich No study proves that masking does more harm than good.
And this abstract doesn't even try to claim that.
Also, the symbol for comply and submit is a red hat with MAGA written on it.
A mask during a pandemic is showing courtesy.
@catturd2 A political party doesn't have the power to arrest someone.
That power lies in the hands of a Grand Jury.
And four Grand Juuries have arrested Trump on over 91 charges because a preponderance of evidence existed for each charge.
That is a lot of evidence of wrong doing.
@katmrowr @llpatriot6 @MCN_2890@laurenboebert You are deflecting.
If the panel shouldn't have been convened, the jurists should have rejected the case. Both are ought, and the first implies the second.
Whether you talked about it specifically is irrelevant.
Are the jurists useful idiots? or complicit in the conspiracy?
@katmrowr @llpatriot6 @MCN_2890@laurenboebert The ellipses mean I am not done.
Please point out the flaw in my logic.
are the jurists useful idiots?
or complicit in the political conspiracy?
@katmrowr @llpatriot6 @MCN_2890@laurenboebert To justify their being called.
So, by your account, the jurists got it wrong.
they are therfore either useful stooges to a political conspiracy,
Or complicit.
Either is an attack on the jurists.
@katmrowr @llpatriot6 @MCN_2890@laurenboebert Yes you specifically claimed the problem was that it was convened in the first place.
But the result of it being convened, the Arrest of Trump and his alleged co-conspirators, was the jurists deciding that they were needed, that the investigators produced sufficient facts...
@CommieKamikaze@Cernovich Well since you have effectively shielded yourself from listening to anything I could say from here on out I feel we have reached the end of any productive conversation.
Have a nice evening.
@CommieKamikaze@Cernovich So now I am also a liar just for asking you for sources.
No wonder you think everyone is lying to you.
We just want to know where you got your information.
@CommieKamikaze@Cernovich No I don't remember that.
I remember seeing case fatality rates at higher than 1 percent and that was pretty scary.
1 in a hundred dying is like 30 million americans dying, but I figured that was an overestimate.
@CommieKamikaze@Cernovich I do expect you to provide sources for your claims.
That is how we learn from each other.
I will gladly provide the resources I was reading back then but the case fatality rate in those was at less than 1% though, until age 55 and above.
@CommieKamikaze@Cernovich No, I made many claims and when challenged on them provided an explanation.
Now that I challenge one of your claims you decide to end the conversation.
Unfortunately I have no choice but to take that as your claim being false
good bye.