The world is crazy and I'm just trying to make sense of it | Futurist | Creative Thinker | AI Enthusiast | Dog lover | Pro ๐ | Pro Harmony | Anti Chaos
In retrospect I wonder if it would have made sense for Anthropic to never admit Mythos existed, and keep it as an internal edge until it was ready.
Seems the prospect of that IPO lead from one blunder to the next.
Also Fable 5 should have just been called Opus 5.
@davidpattersonx In another timeline they stayed in their lane, didn't play a highstakes game to slow down the rest of the AI field via doomerism... and just released Opus 5 with Fable 5 capabilities.
Right now they'd be working on Opus 5.1.
@davidpattersonx The only mistake Anthropic made is not calling Fable 5 just Opus 5.
The government is made up of cronies, crooks, and reactionaries (sometimes rolled up in one) and they will do as they will do.
Expecting 'good' from bad actors is likely what cost Anthropic here most of all.
They need to be fired? But there's no blame on the part of the administration speed-running banning a model in a single afternoon with barely any discussion with the team developing the model?
Perhaps the most insane factor here is that people are taking it at face granted that somehow the US administration has better AI researchers and better red-teamers than Anthropic. Wild.
And that they discovered a vulnerability in just 1 or 2 days.
The premise is beyond absurd. And people hop over points A, B, C, D and end up at Z blaming it entirely on Anthropic...
(Who btw, released the full model to numerous partners, including the government, specifically for testing and refinement)
Crazy stuff.
Is this some sort of a joke? 'Now that the work has been done?'
It's the bleeding edge of tech. What work being done are you talking about? The model was released for just 3 days. We've barely just begun.
There's a handful of labs developing these types of models. And you're suggesting removing the developers on a whim... with an afternoon's worth of notice?
No, they actually can't 'fuck off' because that means fuck off to future advancements.
It also means fuck off to all foreign nationals working at all AI labs, as now there's a precedent that they can be considered persona non grata, and can be subsequently barred (on a whim) from the powerful models they're developing.
It's a disastrous message to send out to world star talent currently working in or being attracted to work at US labs. Wildly short-sighted. But that would be par for the course.
The administration is playing with fire with the one industry currently propping up the US economy.
@darasRantings@kimmonismus By wider impact you mean catastrophic impact.
The administration is playing with fire with the one industry propping up the US economy.
@dari1063@ChrissGPT@DavidSacks The government banned employees who created the model from using the model internally.
That goes beyond export control.
It's a backdoor to an internal ban. As well as haphazardly threatening an entire industry that relies on foreign nationals as part of the backbone.
@Flower_of_Babel@ChrissGPT@DavidSacks The foreign nationals are the ones who **created** the model.
They are also the only ones currently capable of creating the model.
You're questioning their allegiances when you wouldn't be having this discussion without their vital contribution.
@scaling01 The problem isn't the admin saying whatever suits them...
...but that there is still a sizeable portion of the public that fails to recognize the most persistent and obvious patterns of deception.
@DaveBlundin It's one of the most pivotal events because it's the US government stepping out and stating they can block the advancement towards AGI on a whim, or out of spite, or whatever nonsensical reason they hallucinate to fill in the gaps.
Low-key disastrous for the US tech sector.
@victormustar Correction: They would not be able to release GPT-6 because the administration drew a red line forbidding companies from developing models at Mythos-level or above.
She doesn't understand how the technology works. It's not a search engine 'scraping' and creating a database. It's not a database at all.
It's looking at the art and learning patterns from the art as a human would... except with far more efficiency.
It's not an 'art heist' if you go to the Louvre and learn to draw the Mona Lisa by staring at it for years and practicing daily.