Top Tweets for #Benshapiro

My Questions and Problems with the Official Charlie Kirk Narrative "See You in Valhalla!" Introduction The official narrative that Tyler Robinson acted alone as a lone, deranged shooter has significant and accumulating problems. The raw video evidence of the security team’s behavior, combined with multiple technical and timeline discrepancies, suggests coordination and a cover-up rather than a genuine surprise external attack. This document summarizes the key issues raised throughout our discussion. 1. Security Team’s Coordinated and Anomalous Behavior This is the single strongest anomaly. Multiple people directly around Charlie showed calm, low-panic, almost rehearsed responses immediately after the shot: •       Mikey McCoy walking away while already on a live phone call. •       Glances exchanged with Dan Flood seconds before the shot. •       Rapid vehicle modifications (seat and carpet removal) followed by auctioning the SUV. •       Quick paving/bricking of the exact impact site. •       Brian Harpole reportedly cutting Charlie’s shirt in the hospital setting before full medical handover. These actions are far more consistent with a pre-planned or coordinated response than with genuine shock at an unknown rooftop shooter. 2. Video Evidence and Authentication Problems •       Multiple disputes over edited/zoomed surveillance compilations (red circles, blurs, zooms). •       Judge initially rejected some edited videos for authentication issues; later allowed adjusted versions. •       Eyewitnesses in court (e.g., Brandi Siciliani) state there was no high-quality zoomed footage of the actual shot — only the same distant footage already public. •       Conflicting claims from influencers (Benny Johnson, Posobiec) describing “crystal clear 4K” footage that others present say did not exist. 3. Ballistics and Physical Evidence Weaknesses •       ATF examiner testified the microscopic comparison between the recovered rifle and the fatal fragment was **inconclusive**. •       No public evidence that Tyler Robinson had the training or experience to make a precise neck shot with a bolt-action Mauser from the roof under pressure. •       The “cut and dry” claims ignore this fundamental gap. 4. External Communications vs. Emergency Response •       Public records (GRAMA) show **no 911 calls** from the security team or TPUSA on 9/10/25. •       Yet someone connected to the team had time to call Ben Shapiro’s security during transport. •       This directly contradicts claims that the team was too busy saving Charlie to make calls. •       Rapid external awareness (Shapiro call + Netanyahu’s unusually quick public denial) suggests coordination beyond a simple surprise attack. 5. Lance Twiggs (Ex-Partner) Suspicions •       Texts between Robinson and Twiggs show anomalies (e.g., British spelling “calibre”). •       Voice and appearance differences noted by observers compared to expected portrayal. •       Growing theory that Twiggs helped manufacture evidence or set Robinson up as the patsy. 6. Vehicle and Surveillance Footage Discrepancies •       The car shown in the UVU parking garage footage has a front splitter and quad-tip exhaust that Tyler Robinson’s actual Dodge Challenger does not have. •       This is a clear visual mismatch in key surveillance evidence. 7. Narrative Control and Deflection Tactics •       Aggressive personal attacks on questioners (Candace Owens, Megyn Kelly, Tucker, Massie, MTG, and many others) instead of engaging the evidence. •       Broad use of the “antisemite” label to shut down discussion. •       Emotional propaganda (Benny Johnson’s “go to Hell” post) while eyewitnesses contradict the “crystal clear 4K” claims. •       “Cut and dry / overwhelmingly conclusive” declarations from Don Jr. and others that do not survive basic scrutiny of the individual pieces of evidence. Key Unanswered Questions 1.     Why did the security team show coordinated, low-panic behavior instead of genuine shock? 2.     Why was there no 911 call from the team despite public records requests? 3.     Why did they have time to call Ben Shapiro’s security but allegedly not 911 or focus purely on medical aid? 4.     Why the rapid vehicle stripping and scene paving if this was a standard external shooting? 5.     Why the inconclusive ballistics and lack of evidence for Robinson’s marksmanship ability? 6.     Why the car in the footage doesn’t match Tyler’s actual vehicle? 7.     Why the aggressive attacks on anyone questioning the full picture instead of transparent answers? Conclusion When the raw video of the security team’s actions is weighed alongside the technical discrepancies (car, video quality, ballistics, 911 records), the official “lone deranged shooter” story requires accepting too many convenient coincidences and explanations. The coordinated response and rapid sanitization are far more consistent with foreknowledge or an inside job than with a genuine surprise external attack. The refusal to aggressively investigate the team’s behavior while pushing a contested narrative against one suspect creates the strong appearance of narrative protection rather than truth-seeking. Until these core questions are addressed with transparency and full discovery, the “See you in Valhalla” story remains deeply unconvincing to anyone examining the evidence without institutional loyalty.