Top Tweets for #CHARITYCOMMISSION

The Charity Commission Is Iran's Best Friend in Britain A 109 page report by Lord Walney, submitted to the House of Lords this week, lifts the curtain on how Iran has systematically built a soft power infrastructure inside Britain through the charitable sector. It names ten organisations, among them the Islamic Centre of England, the Islamic Human Rights Commission Trust, the Irshad Trust trading as The Islamic College, and Labaik Ya Zahra. It traces their personnel links to the IRGC and Iranian state institutions. It documents the spread of Khomeinist ideology, the fostering of antisemitism, and the transnational repression of Iranian dissidents on British soil. And then it reveals the detail that should stop every taxpayer cold: four of the named charities are recognised for HMRC Gift Aid. Britain is not just failing to stop Iran's network. It is subsidising it, by twenty five pence in every pound donated. Walney's report documents how Iran has systematically built a soft power infrastructure inside Britain through the charitable sector. The ten named charities spread Khomeinist ideology, foster antisemitism, conduct transnational repression of Iranian dissidents, and maintain direct personnel links to the IRGC and Iranian state institutions. Eight of the ten are under Charity Commission investigation. All ten continue to operate. The most revealing detail is not what these charities do. It is what happens when the regulator finds out. When the Islamic Centre of England was found to have a constitution legally requiring one trustee to be a direct appointee of the Iranian supreme leader, the Commission's solution was to have the trustee step down and the constitution amended. The same figures, with the same ideological connections, simply rotated back into power under different titles. The Commission filed the case and moved on. The network kept operating. This is the compliance trap. The regulator investigates governance, not ideology. It fixes trustees rather than closes organisations. It treats hostile state influence as trustee misconduct and marks the case resolved. As Walney puts it, the Commission has been inadvertently helping extremist linked charities obscure their true nature. Inadvertently. That word is doing enormous work. Sir William Shawcross, former head of the Charity Commission, named the real reason directly. There is, he said, a real nervousness about talking about suspicions of Muslim organisations, a widespread fear of being accused of racism. That fear has a cost paid not by the regulators who flinch but by Iranian dissidents living under transnational repression conducted through institutions the British state is actively subsidising. The human cost is not abstract. Members of the Iranian diaspora report being apprehensive about travelling to parts of Brent where several of these charities are based. Brent East and Brent West are represented by Dawn Butler and Barry Gardiner respectively, both Labour MPs, both silent on the matter. At the Islamic Centre of England, children were filmed saluting and pledging to follow the path of Soleimani. On British soil. In a registered charity. Under Charity Commission investigation. A former government adviser put it with devastating clarity: "This is not a grassroots Shia manifestation. It's basically been imported in. And it's been imported because the Iranian government has picked a few people to come and run British religious institutions." The Charity Commission says its hands are tied by statute. Without IRGC proscription it can only act where there is clear evidence of a breach of charity law. The system is designed to fail. And the political will to redesign it has been absent under every government for years. "Members of the Iranian diaspora report being apprehensive about travelling to parts of Brent where several of these charities are based. Brent East and Brent West are represented by Dawn Butler and Barry Gardiner"