Top Tweets for #Endislam

How can a regime that massacres more than 40,000 people in just two nights, executes young men and women on a daily basis, and systematically violates the most fundamental human rights, be nominated to a UN body responsible for shaping the organisation’s human rights policies and priorities? A regime that imprisons, tortures and executes people simply because they hold different political views, demand freedom, and want a better future for their country. A regime that has demonstrated, time and again, that it has absolutely no understanding of the meaning of human rights. And now, this very regime is being given a seat at the table to help decide what human rights should mean, which issues deserve attention, and what priorities the United Nations should pursue. How can the United Nations expect the world to take its commitment to human rights seriously when it gives such a role to a regime that systematically tramples on them? Standing in front of the Wall of the Fallen, surrounded by the faces of those who gave their lives for freedom, this question becomes even more painful. This is not merely an insult to the people of Iran, to the thousands of victims and their families, and to an entire nation fighting for freedom. It is an insult to every democratic country and every nation that genuinely considers the protection of human rights a fundamental principle. A regime responsible for mass murder and daily executions cannot be a guardian of human rights. It belongs before international justice, not at the United Nations table where human rights policies are shaped.

Islam is the sanctification of man’s most corrupted instincts. It takes what is base in human nature and give it a divine sanction. Man’s desire to dominate women? Islam codifies it. Veiling, polygamy, child marriage, testimony worth half a man’s, all justified as God’s will. The tribal impulse of “my group over yours”? Islam raises it to the level of theology: believers vs. infidels, the ummah against the world. The lust for supremacy and conquest? Islam call it jihad and makes it a religious demand. The primal rage at dissent? Islam turns it into law: apostasy punishable by death. Man’s lust for unlimited sex? Islam provides it: four wives, temporary marriages, concubines, sex slaves, and the promise of virgins in paradise. This is why Islam went global, beside the sword, it spread because it indulged what was already animal in humans. It is like pornography, irresistible to the flesh, destructive to the soul. It thrives because it removes all discipline from sexuality, power and ego. It appeals to the raw, the unrefined, the barbaric impulse in man, and calls it holy. The West, by contrast, was built on the exact opposite impulse. The Judeo-Christian tradition does not legitimize man’s depravity, it restrains it. Western civilization is not the freedom of instincts but the discipline of them. It is the recognition that man’s raw impulses lead to tyranny, slavery, and barbarism unless they are checked by higher law. The clash between Islam and the West is not merely geopolitical. It is civilizational at the deepest level: Whether human nature should be indulged or disciplined, whether man’s lowest instincts are to be worshipped or restrained.

So the child marriage, forced hijab, polygyny, slavery, sex slavery, honour violence, murdering of kuffar and infidels and blasphemers, jihad, antisemitism, homophobia, dehumanization of women, male supremacy, colonialism and conquest of the world, wife beatings, domestic abuse and marital rape, dhimmitude, deception, war, fear mongering, basically all that violence and hatred is from Allah Himself directly, right? You concur that your Allah said so. Good. I like it when Muslims finally start being honest.