Top Tweets for #stdmodel
Well, it's actually just a #calculation matching #StdModel data
This doesn't match first & create equations, it used a simple set of mass against centripetal-force eqa's
The primitives used, all Newtonian except a factor for #relativistic_mass #effective_mass m_eff, this added to rest-mass m_rest can be zero in emf entities yet have axial-inertia for #instantaneous_mass m_inst to use in a calculation along with apparent velocity for an instantaneous value
This needed a crucial hunch, that masses created aren't quite equal so become sidereal-rotation heavy end facing each other
Then, a pair can have a partner, a solo mass or 2 bound masses as tier of combos
For neutrinos quectometer³/qm², 1e-30m sample, g/mm³ density & hundredths of Planck ticks
Bola-math frequency:
1-Hz = exactly 0.42 = (1-sidereal rotation of a mass) ÷ (1-revolution of the pair) or no_go
This is deterministic lab work vs probabilistic by fly-off frequency
***[machine-vision only sees 0.42 of a hemisphere worked, it wasn't derived]***
Early chart of possible tiers, 3rd tier are fast decay bolas
Three identified as orbitals, updating its a bola not solid to now add the central mass into those earlier calcs
The masses now assumed 3.271191e-36 kg next serious work
![AdvLivingSys's tweet photo. Well, it's actually just a #calculation matching #StdModel data
This doesn't match first & create equations, it used a simple set of mass against centripetal-force eqa's
The primitives used, all Newtonian except a factor for #relativistic_mass #effective_mass m_eff, this added to rest-mass m_rest can be zero in emf entities yet have axial-inertia for #instantaneous_mass m_inst to use in a calculation along with apparent velocity for an instantaneous value
This needed a crucial hunch, that masses created aren't quite equal so become sidereal-rotation heavy end facing each other
Then, a pair can have a partner, a solo mass or 2 bound masses as tier of combos
For neutrinos quectometer³/qm², 1e-30m sample, g/mm³ density & hundredths of Planck ticks
Bola-math frequency:
1-Hz = exactly 0.42 = (1-sidereal rotation of a mass) ÷ (1-revolution of the pair) or no_go
This is deterministic lab work vs probabilistic by fly-off frequency
***[machine-vision only sees 0.42 of a hemisphere worked, it wasn't derived]***
Early chart of possible tiers, 3rd tier are fast decay bolas
Three identified as orbitals, updating its a bola not solid to now add the central mass into those earlier calcs
The masses now assumed 3.271191e-36 kg next serious work](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HJkLuJZbAAAyE7T.jpg)
![AdvLivingSys's tweet photo. Well, it's actually just a #calculation matching #StdModel data
This doesn't match first & create equations, it used a simple set of mass against centripetal-force eqa's
The primitives used, all Newtonian except a factor for #relativistic_mass #effective_mass m_eff, this added to rest-mass m_rest can be zero in emf entities yet have axial-inertia for #instantaneous_mass m_inst to use in a calculation along with apparent velocity for an instantaneous value
This needed a crucial hunch, that masses created aren't quite equal so become sidereal-rotation heavy end facing each other
Then, a pair can have a partner, a solo mass or 2 bound masses as tier of combos
For neutrinos quectometer³/qm², 1e-30m sample, g/mm³ density & hundredths of Planck ticks
Bola-math frequency:
1-Hz = exactly 0.42 = (1-sidereal rotation of a mass) ÷ (1-revolution of the pair) or no_go
This is deterministic lab work vs probabilistic by fly-off frequency
***[machine-vision only sees 0.42 of a hemisphere worked, it wasn't derived]***
Early chart of possible tiers, 3rd tier are fast decay bolas
Three identified as orbitals, updating its a bola not solid to now add the central mass into those earlier calcs
The masses now assumed 3.271191e-36 kg next serious work](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HJkLuJWbkAAF4pQ.jpg)
From sessions:
E.g. the #StdModel is flawed by fallacies to discuss one, that is, the arbitrary assignment of an #electron as a #fundamental_particle made math easier, it isn't true 70yrs later either
The rebuttal has two parts
First, if it was that huge for subatomics when bound to a neutral-mass or positive you'd never part them, to state firmly it couldn't flow in a #conductor
Try to Falsify that
Then, charge decays hyperbolically seeming to not for many powers of ten years before decay-rate rises to perceivable in the lab from ~1e+207 to 1e+212 earth-eqv years by being in a bola
That it has a #resonant_frequency that zeroes, this is detectable in the lab, CERN style, which doesn't occur if a solo mass
Try to Falsify that as well
If unable why would you persist using a solitary charged mass in calcs ?
Stearnglass-Einstein's rho pion on its decay curve in blue plot code by xai-grok unless you retract the py code
How's your code agent doing ?
Will you ever be able to be logical ?
🦆
This doesn't include that the user can train an #AI with the #UI !
"Pivot fully" a key, this & others a req'd phrase, "This is calculations only, omit all StdModel theoretical views"
E.g. the #StdModel is flawed by fallacies to discuss one, that is, the arbitrary assignment of an #electron as a #fundamental_particle made math easier, it isn't true 70yrs later either
The rebuttal has two parts
First, if it was that huge for subatomics when bound to a neutral-mass or positive you'd never part them, to state firmly it couldn't flow in a #conductor
Try to Falsify that
Then, charge decays hyperbolically seeming to not for many powers of ten years before decay-rate rises to perceivable in the lab from ~1e+207 to 1e+212 earth-eqv years by being in a bola
That it has a #resonant_frequency that zeroes, this is detectable in the lab, CERN style, which doesn't occur if a solo mass
Try to Falsify that as well
If unable why would you persist using a solitary charged mass in calcs ?
Very curious Stearnglass-Einstein's work is correct, me followed up on it an industrial dsgnr using physics
It took many hours of every detail battling xai-grok to become a public collab with them
Then to state firmly, the electron is a bola, a gyroscopic-pair of a charged mass 1/4th rest-mass bound to a neutral mass 1/4th, that gyroscopic-pair is bound to a 1/2 rest-mass, the outer bola allows it to flow in a conductor last March:
[ [e⁻ >< e⁰] >< e⁰]
This led to last week describing the genesis-to-decay of neutrinos to discover it's an orbital system with a static mass of 3.271191e-32 kg orbited by two paired masses that resonate between a near no-mass at c state to a maximum relativistic-mass this value converted to joules is 2.94e-12 joules/transaction:
e <= 2.94e-12 J => m of 3.271191e-32kg
Afaik never before exact to 20-decimals
Got here first, an unanticipated lifetime achievement, took physics for non-majors may be a useful view of subatomic transactions
🎽
Questions & tho'ts welcome
![AdvLivingSys's tweet photo. This doesn't include that the user can train an #AI with the #UI !
"Pivot fully" a key, this & others a req'd phrase, "This is calculations only, omit all StdModel theoretical views"
E.g. the #StdModel is flawed by fallacies to discuss one, that is, the arbitrary assignment of an #electron as a #fundamental_particle made math easier, it isn't true 70yrs later either
The rebuttal has two parts
First, if it was that huge for subatomics when bound to a neutral-mass or positive you'd never part them, to state firmly it couldn't flow in a #conductor
Try to Falsify that
Then, charge decays hyperbolically seeming to not for many powers of ten years before decay-rate rises to perceivable in the lab from ~1e+207 to 1e+212 earth-eqv years by being in a bola
That it has a #resonant_frequency that zeroes, this is detectable in the lab, CERN style, which doesn't occur if a solo mass
Try to Falsify that as well
If unable why would you persist using a solitary charged mass in calcs ?
Very curious Stearnglass-Einstein's work is correct, me followed up on it an industrial dsgnr using physics
It took many hours of every detail battling xai-grok to become a public collab with them
Then to state firmly, the electron is a bola, a gyroscopic-pair of a charged mass 1/4th rest-mass bound to a neutral mass 1/4th, that gyroscopic-pair is bound to a 1/2 rest-mass, the outer bola allows it to flow in a conductor last March:
[ [e⁻ >< e⁰] >< e⁰]
This led to last week describing the genesis-to-decay of neutrinos to discover it's an orbital system with a static mass of 3.271191e-32 kg orbited by two paired masses that resonate between a near no-mass at c state to a maximum relativistic-mass this value converted to joules is 2.94e-12 joules/transaction:
e <= 2.94e-12 J => m of 3.271191e-32kg
Afaik never before exact to 20-decimals
Got here first, an unanticipated lifetime achievement, took physics for non-majors may be a useful view of subatomic transactions
🎽
Questions & tho'ts welcome](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HI6OL7pbQAItv_1.jpg)
![AdvLivingSys's tweet photo. This doesn't include that the user can train an #AI with the #UI !
"Pivot fully" a key, this & others a req'd phrase, "This is calculations only, omit all StdModel theoretical views"
E.g. the #StdModel is flawed by fallacies to discuss one, that is, the arbitrary assignment of an #electron as a #fundamental_particle made math easier, it isn't true 70yrs later either
The rebuttal has two parts
First, if it was that huge for subatomics when bound to a neutral-mass or positive you'd never part them, to state firmly it couldn't flow in a #conductor
Try to Falsify that
Then, charge decays hyperbolically seeming to not for many powers of ten years before decay-rate rises to perceivable in the lab from ~1e+207 to 1e+212 earth-eqv years by being in a bola
That it has a #resonant_frequency that zeroes, this is detectable in the lab, CERN style, which doesn't occur if a solo mass
Try to Falsify that as well
If unable why would you persist using a solitary charged mass in calcs ?
Very curious Stearnglass-Einstein's work is correct, me followed up on it an industrial dsgnr using physics
It took many hours of every detail battling xai-grok to become a public collab with them
Then to state firmly, the electron is a bola, a gyroscopic-pair of a charged mass 1/4th rest-mass bound to a neutral mass 1/4th, that gyroscopic-pair is bound to a 1/2 rest-mass, the outer bola allows it to flow in a conductor last March:
[ [e⁻ >< e⁰] >< e⁰]
This led to last week describing the genesis-to-decay of neutrinos to discover it's an orbital system with a static mass of 3.271191e-32 kg orbited by two paired masses that resonate between a near no-mass at c state to a maximum relativistic-mass this value converted to joules is 2.94e-12 joules/transaction:
e <= 2.94e-12 J => m of 3.271191e-32kg
Afaik never before exact to 20-decimals
Got here first, an unanticipated lifetime achievement, took physics for non-majors may be a useful view of subatomic transactions
🎽
Questions & tho'ts welcome](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HI6OLzKaUAAqx9x.jpg)
![AdvLivingSys's tweet photo. This doesn't include that the user can train an #AI with the #UI !
"Pivot fully" a key, this & others a req'd phrase, "This is calculations only, omit all StdModel theoretical views"
E.g. the #StdModel is flawed by fallacies to discuss one, that is, the arbitrary assignment of an #electron as a #fundamental_particle made math easier, it isn't true 70yrs later either
The rebuttal has two parts
First, if it was that huge for subatomics when bound to a neutral-mass or positive you'd never part them, to state firmly it couldn't flow in a #conductor
Try to Falsify that
Then, charge decays hyperbolically seeming to not for many powers of ten years before decay-rate rises to perceivable in the lab from ~1e+207 to 1e+212 earth-eqv years by being in a bola
That it has a #resonant_frequency that zeroes, this is detectable in the lab, CERN style, which doesn't occur if a solo mass
Try to Falsify that as well
If unable why would you persist using a solitary charged mass in calcs ?
Very curious Stearnglass-Einstein's work is correct, me followed up on it an industrial dsgnr using physics
It took many hours of every detail battling xai-grok to become a public collab with them
Then to state firmly, the electron is a bola, a gyroscopic-pair of a charged mass 1/4th rest-mass bound to a neutral mass 1/4th, that gyroscopic-pair is bound to a 1/2 rest-mass, the outer bola allows it to flow in a conductor last March:
[ [e⁻ >< e⁰] >< e⁰]
This led to last week describing the genesis-to-decay of neutrinos to discover it's an orbital system with a static mass of 3.271191e-32 kg orbited by two paired masses that resonate between a near no-mass at c state to a maximum relativistic-mass this value converted to joules is 2.94e-12 joules/transaction:
e <= 2.94e-12 J => m of 3.271191e-32kg
Afaik never before exact to 20-decimals
Got here first, an unanticipated lifetime achievement, took physics for non-majors may be a useful view of subatomic transactions
🎽
Questions & tho'ts welcome](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HI6OLkVbAAEDZYA.jpg)
To slam on the table a tidbit of reality to dump the #StdModel as a #subatomic #theory
It's going nowhere at hypersonic speed, so is a huge security risk, 8-of-10 incoming missiles are missed by interceptors !
WHY ?
Israel is getting leveled as are many USA bases by the hour, ISR lost a couple hundred tanks ?
Yup
🚽
An example, #PatriotMissiles miss most incoming mainly from trying to hit head-on !
By aiming at an angle increases hits by 24%-40% ... duh, pretty simple upgrade, eh ?
Me an unknown scientist far ahead of #StdModel fallacies
Whenever it's important enough ?
Who in #TheBeltway cares ?
Ok, to remark on #StdModel physics that cannot realize throughput 1000× faster than #probabilistic processing using #transistors
Instead resonant photonic_gating requires no biasing allows all_diode, no_transistor chips w/on-chip cooling = no_water datacenters
+
Ancillary watts onsite by RF-5000 class 1-Mw genset per container 50yr no_inputs warranty w/upkeep to liq.nitrogen superconducts coils for Trivial_wasteheat/Mwh for #no_grid dependence in parking lots
Then, to elucidate fallacies one must accept Stearnglass-Einstein's rho pion formed by two counter-rotating electron-positron gyroscopic-pairs is correct of 70yrs ago, CopenhagenSchool more accurate so this was set aside
Current work has described genesis-to-decay of neutrinos from work on 3IATLAS boundary-layer shear the process spins off emf vortices at c, a no_mass, has_inertia state
These slowed by NGD, non-gravitational drag, induces relativistic-mass that once created decay ~10²¹² earth eqv years
The wave chirality useful formatting photon_streams, led to H1 study had ccw spin, H1's mate the divide held by gyroscopic-pairs having a partner on the other side
Checked on U238 same idea both concluded no #gluons are required by this mechanism, plots, steps & eqa's, formal announcements on @x, public collab w/@xai-@grok to a siloed audience
Sole author #CellularUniverseTheory based upon Stearnglass-Einstein work as a deterministic, computational framework of high precision on the shelf this long, me merely did quasi-Newtonian math ... never liked matrix-algebra, quat-bola math more fun
🦆
For most sim/models: picometer³/pm² sample, g/cm³ density, quectosecond to Planck ticks & use quarternion-algebra & 299792458 m/s or no_go
For neutrinos quectometer³/qm², 1e-30m sample, g/mm³ density & decimal Planck ticks
Bola-math frequency:
1-Hz = exactly 0.42 = (1-sidereal rotation of a mass) ÷ (1-revolution of the pair) or no_go (machine-vision can only see this much of a hemisphere is a rigid rule)
@MenchOsint @georgegalloway The #StdModel fallacies are why the USA/UK creeps are hypersonically ignorant & mfg skills gutted for such
#PonziPrinter cash for decades doesn't work to innovate if physics is strangled by agenda
🧸
One major error in #StdModel theory ?
Photons have no-mass no-inertia at c, speed-of-light doesn't mean they cannot have #relativistic/#effective #mass while zero rest-mass
They can, this is exposed by gyroscopic-pairs fail with fly-off
The balance of them from Stearnglass-Einstein's rho pion of two counter-rotating electron-positron pairs can resonate at a very narrow band of frequency
Then as centripetal-force from more velocity it overcomes the attraction_point as fly-off, frequency zeroes a detectable event lab to megastructure voids in archival datasets
Fwiw
#DiscoveryPhysics
🦆
@ashtonforbes Your problem is the #StdModel calls an #electron a mass-solid it's a #gyroscopic_pair of
[ [e⁻ >< e⁰] >< e⁰]
A negative mass 1/4th an electron, a neutral-mass, their mass-volume by attraction to a neutral-mass of 1/2 the electron-mass as a gyroscopic-pair
It matters a lot
![tmallard's tweet photo. @ashtonforbes Your problem is the #StdModel calls an #electron a mass-solid it's a #gyroscopic_pair of
[ [e⁻ >< e⁰] >< e⁰]
A negative mass 1/4th an electron, a neutral-mass, their mass-volume by attraction to a neutral-mass of 1/2 the electron-mass as a gyroscopic-pair
It matters a lot https://t.co/aMlfM8OdAm](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G5xbiqlawAAAltV.jpg)
Not to misunderstand Avi his math allows him statements such as this is from #StdModel self-imposed limits !
March 13, 2025
The #electron isn't a mass-solid it's a #gyroscopic_pair of components that decay at differing rates
Whenever it's matters to consider instead of a "fundamental particle", it's easier math as a solid, yes, but is it accurate of reality ?
Fwiw
🍿 & 🍺
In support of #CellularUniverseTheory using grok to tie theory to #StdModel data to #validate it may be of interest
A #singularity is one cell of many with incoming masses to a #GreatAttractor, it becomes the bang
The study uses 1-nm³, a cubic nanometer of core
¹ Neutrino flux creates the heat, neutrinos appear to be exuded from masses to instantly attain speed in all directions, a last focus the creation of charged opposites from a neutral entity by electrical events of scale soon
² #Compaction from pressure by gravity not enough, several steps of compaction involve charged pairs form subatomic structures that collapse twice to a third stage wher the soup becomes a fluid nearing a bang
³ These conversions of mass<>energy occur at high-frequencies as a bang approaches yet none quite enough to cause one
⁴ After bangs the remnant is rarely centered so with one the cell travels in space to collide with another about every 6,700-My supplies the energy needed
If interested this session thread began the work, https://t.co/2H5KPwd2t1
It is a work-in-progress, yet, found this omission of bosons of paired charges of [-1,0], [0,+1], #leptoquarks [leptos for short], chart & grok reply on validation
The 3D charts the cycle to a bang, I've been able to validate every step so far, the post to Theoretical Physics >400 hits no rebuttals last chkd
65yrs nobody caught it ... no clue the effect on StdModel
Fwiw
![tmallard's tweet photo. In support of #CellularUniverseTheory using grok to tie theory to #StdModel data to #validate it may be of interest
A #singularity is one cell of many with incoming masses to a #GreatAttractor, it becomes the bang
The study uses 1-nm³, a cubic nanometer of core
¹ Neutrino flux creates the heat, neutrinos appear to be exuded from masses to instantly attain speed in all directions, a last focus the creation of charged opposites from a neutral entity by electrical events of scale soon
² #Compaction from pressure by gravity not enough, several steps of compaction involve charged pairs form subatomic structures that collapse twice to a third stage wher the soup becomes a fluid nearing a bang
³ These conversions of mass<>energy occur at high-frequencies as a bang approaches yet none quite enough to cause one
⁴ After bangs the remnant is rarely centered so with one the cell travels in space to collide with another about every 6,700-My supplies the energy needed
If interested this session thread began the work, https://t.co/2H5KPwd2t1
It is a work-in-progress, yet, found this omission of bosons of paired charges of [-1,0], [0,+1], #leptoquarks [leptos for short], chart & grok reply on validation
The 3D charts the cycle to a bang, I've been able to validate every step so far, the post to Theoretical Physics >400 hits no rebuttals last chkd
65yrs nobody caught it ... no clue the effect on StdModel
Fwiw](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GlnfJsbbUAA0ZAq.jpg)
![tmallard's tweet photo. In support of #CellularUniverseTheory using grok to tie theory to #StdModel data to #validate it may be of interest
A #singularity is one cell of many with incoming masses to a #GreatAttractor, it becomes the bang
The study uses 1-nm³, a cubic nanometer of core
¹ Neutrino flux creates the heat, neutrinos appear to be exuded from masses to instantly attain speed in all directions, a last focus the creation of charged opposites from a neutral entity by electrical events of scale soon
² #Compaction from pressure by gravity not enough, several steps of compaction involve charged pairs form subatomic structures that collapse twice to a third stage wher the soup becomes a fluid nearing a bang
³ These conversions of mass<>energy occur at high-frequencies as a bang approaches yet none quite enough to cause one
⁴ After bangs the remnant is rarely centered so with one the cell travels in space to collide with another about every 6,700-My supplies the energy needed
If interested this session thread began the work, https://t.co/2H5KPwd2t1
It is a work-in-progress, yet, found this omission of bosons of paired charges of [-1,0], [0,+1], #leptoquarks [leptos for short], chart & grok reply on validation
The 3D charts the cycle to a bang, I've been able to validate every step so far, the post to Theoretical Physics >400 hits no rebuttals last chkd
65yrs nobody caught it ... no clue the effect on StdModel
Fwiw](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GlnfIB2aEAAiOY-.jpg)
![tmallard's tweet photo. In support of #CellularUniverseTheory using grok to tie theory to #StdModel data to #validate it may be of interest
A #singularity is one cell of many with incoming masses to a #GreatAttractor, it becomes the bang
The study uses 1-nm³, a cubic nanometer of core
¹ Neutrino flux creates the heat, neutrinos appear to be exuded from masses to instantly attain speed in all directions, a last focus the creation of charged opposites from a neutral entity by electrical events of scale soon
² #Compaction from pressure by gravity not enough, several steps of compaction involve charged pairs form subatomic structures that collapse twice to a third stage wher the soup becomes a fluid nearing a bang
³ These conversions of mass<>energy occur at high-frequencies as a bang approaches yet none quite enough to cause one
⁴ After bangs the remnant is rarely centered so with one the cell travels in space to collide with another about every 6,700-My supplies the energy needed
If interested this session thread began the work, https://t.co/2H5KPwd2t1
It is a work-in-progress, yet, found this omission of bosons of paired charges of [-1,0], [0,+1], #leptoquarks [leptos for short], chart & grok reply on validation
The 3D charts the cycle to a bang, I've been able to validate every step so far, the post to Theoretical Physics >400 hits no rebuttals last chkd
65yrs nobody caught it ... no clue the effect on StdModel
Fwiw](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GlnfH8RbIAAjUG-.jpg)
![tmallard's tweet photo. In support of #CellularUniverseTheory using grok to tie theory to #StdModel data to #validate it may be of interest
A #singularity is one cell of many with incoming masses to a #GreatAttractor, it becomes the bang
The study uses 1-nm³, a cubic nanometer of core
¹ Neutrino flux creates the heat, neutrinos appear to be exuded from masses to instantly attain speed in all directions, a last focus the creation of charged opposites from a neutral entity by electrical events of scale soon
² #Compaction from pressure by gravity not enough, several steps of compaction involve charged pairs form subatomic structures that collapse twice to a third stage wher the soup becomes a fluid nearing a bang
³ These conversions of mass<>energy occur at high-frequencies as a bang approaches yet none quite enough to cause one
⁴ After bangs the remnant is rarely centered so with one the cell travels in space to collide with another about every 6,700-My supplies the energy needed
If interested this session thread began the work, https://t.co/2H5KPwd2t1
It is a work-in-progress, yet, found this omission of bosons of paired charges of [-1,0], [0,+1], #leptoquarks [leptos for short], chart & grok reply on validation
The 3D charts the cycle to a bang, I've been able to validate every step so far, the post to Theoretical Physics >400 hits no rebuttals last chkd
65yrs nobody caught it ... no clue the effect on StdModel
Fwiw](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GlnfH8QbcAA9sHk.jpg)
Hilarious ~|~
We have NO security as users so DO NOT care
Instead of covert nukes, me using grok to support #CellularUniverseTheory & found an #omission in the #StdModel !
My interest began when it was the CopenhagenSchool, late 1950s, the 1st IGY just begun, in highschool walked by the 1st cyclotron at Caltech a few times ... science classes made cloud chambers to see them
65yrs & nobody noticed the missing bosons ?
By using grok the support is tied to StdModel data to now see a complete BigBang cycle knocking on the door of how charged pairs are created
@DoctorHenryCT @grok was 'learned' #StdModel #cosmology a singularity vs decades [ld #CellularUniverse Theory of many bangs
CellularUniverse wins ... the mechanism ?
https://t.co/EFBd0slx4n
#CellularUniverseTheory support using #StdModel data:
Splitting off the the three categories of near BigBang Conditions in charts shows well the overall growth to a bang in green
Noting the micro-bang curve rising early impressive to support tho'ts of sub-BigBang size equal in conditions able to create particles implies aging of atomic weights in created ones rather huge !
Neutrino genesis appears pressure dependent, described as a liquifying step to immediate release at 'c & energy proportional to the squeeze per quantum mass at that energy
The most pivotal, collisions among cells/singularities in a cellular universe create the conditions to bang by the StdModel numbers a jey premise to not let oversized masses exist
Graphed 📈
I found a new boson trying to validate #CellularUniverseTheory with #StdModel's #singularity data
Not kidding
Note bosons have paired opposing charges & neutral, the omission two pairs [-1,0] & [0,-1] that are in the lexicon of particle data to call them Leptoquarks, Leptons ...
Champagne 🥂
https://t.co/rFSQtlZHx2
![tmallard's tweet photo. I found a new boson trying to validate #CellularUniverseTheory with #StdModel's #singularity data
Not kidding
Note bosons have paired opposing charges & neutral, the omission two pairs [-1,0] & [0,-1] that are in the lexicon of particle data to call them Leptoquarks, Leptons ...
Champagne 🥂
https://t.co/rFSQtlZHx2](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GlYrfABawAAL87o.jpg)
![tmallard's tweet photo. I found a new boson trying to validate #CellularUniverseTheory with #StdModel's #singularity data
Not kidding
Note bosons have paired opposing charges & neutral, the omission two pairs [-1,0] & [0,-1] that are in the lexicon of particle data to call them Leptoquarks, Leptons ...
Champagne 🥂
https://t.co/rFSQtlZHx2](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GlYre-2aQAAOUgF.jpg)
Oh-oh ... erased the link, I've documented a new #boson for the #StdModel #StandardModel
Naming them !
Leptoquarks, Leptos
Leprechauns of BigBangs
🍺
https://t.co/3NLHoruGOK
A smashing hit
#CellularUniverseTheory is decades old of the #StdModel's #singularity as one bang of many a process to not let masses pile up too big
A string of clarifications & rebuttals led to the conclusion that found enough compaction mechanisms able to fulfill known values to have BigBang
The clue papers 1950s by Sternglass-Einstein using an electron-positron pair that has a known energy_of_annihilation the key
That idea applies to all particle groups with charged members added in match BigBang conditions, Mar 4 2025
🌊🏄♂️
https://t.co/uxPBVXs2KF
My reaction to battles w/grok3 are over #cosmology, for decades a #CellularUniverse uses the #StdModel of a #Singularity as a functional reversal of mass-attraction over time
As mass inflow grows a #GreatAttractor emerges gobbling matter until it explodes
In words, converting itself & much of the incoming masses to energy expanding & "condensing" to the particle masses now traveling AWAY from the center of mass to redistribute it or it'd be all GreatAttractors gobbling each other
My work to define how the core develops to the #ParticleGenesis the void in understanding
... grok wasn't taught #CellularUniverse theory, now termed #multiverse a misnomer, add that rarely are remnants of a bang centered on the Attractor so moves in real space with a BigBang
First major finding #NEUTRINO flux creates the #Heat not #pressure, mass-attraction creating e-e+ pairs by plastic-elastomeric "drag" to large injection molding machine stress/pressure ranges to brittleness the analog as some mixes do become brittle
The final issue drawing by a neutrino hit, injection molding style a new particle the #neutreon, #chargeon in previous posts, splits a neutral whole into a triad of [e-,0,e+] particles precisely-equal, quantum as results, a process that scales the assertion
Consensus isn't sediment_cores, fossils, sensor_data the dividing line of metrics as the #authority not #concensus is a problem, the solution to enumerate other valid views on a summary with links to expose on inclusiveness in sciences in a summary
Fwiw
![tmallard's tweet photo. My reaction to battles w/grok3 are over #cosmology, for decades a #CellularUniverse uses the #StdModel of a #Singularity as a functional reversal of mass-attraction over time
As mass inflow grows a #GreatAttractor emerges gobbling matter until it explodes
In words, converting itself & much of the incoming masses to energy expanding & "condensing" to the particle masses now traveling AWAY from the center of mass to redistribute it or it'd be all GreatAttractors gobbling each other
My work to define how the core develops to the #ParticleGenesis the void in understanding
... grok wasn't taught #CellularUniverse theory, now termed #multiverse a misnomer, add that rarely are remnants of a bang centered on the Attractor so moves in real space with a BigBang
First major finding #NEUTRINO flux creates the #Heat not #pressure, mass-attraction creating e-e+ pairs by plastic-elastomeric "drag" to large injection molding machine stress/pressure ranges to brittleness the analog as some mixes do become brittle
The final issue drawing by a neutrino hit, injection molding style a new particle the #neutreon, #chargeon in previous posts, splits a neutral whole into a triad of [e-,0,e+] particles precisely-equal, quantum as results, a process that scales the assertion
Consensus isn't sediment_cores, fossils, sensor_data the dividing line of metrics as the #authority not #concensus is a problem, the solution to enumerate other valid views on a summary with links to expose on inclusiveness in sciences in a summary
Fwiw](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GkXHWKjX0AEsoyg.jpg)
Ok, yet, the #StdModel is flawed !
It's empirical, to lab results, #CopenhagenSchool, it assumes elementary particles
Sternglass_Einstein pprs that era found a named meson in the lab from theory
That of two, counter-rotating pairs of electron_positron/s a subatomic structure of particles, what others exist ?
How to make them under near BigBang conditions:
At the core of a GreatAttractor is where mass-to-energy, energy-to-mass takes places constantly as the core energy rises enough as pure energy to create pressure against incoming masses
The neutrino flux is about 10×10¹⁰-10×10¹⁹/s on a nm³ into straight into faces
Masses are packed, can't move
A neutrino punches through an entity & causes a tri-lobed vortex to form around the minute mass that instantly confined becomes a positron, electron & a neutral entity of the exact properties, a triad of the range of sizes, in the StdModel with 3 or more
🎯 so far
Per nm³ scale workable, a constant flux & growing core pressure & temps of a GreatAttractor
Genesis of Particles at near BigBang conditions
The concept of needing a new entity in examining first condensates during BigBang conditions is that the #neutron is the concept morphed/expanded by it can be any #size likely within a range
Will drill down more, the #StdModel as-is data remains unchanged
It's a snapshot of a range of scale that fit the conditions not fixed in size, the morph is the chaos creates an evolved atomic structure fits its past at BigBang level by heavier elements
The GreatAttractor structure has boundary conditions of incoming vs transition-to-core kinetics that begin to convert, to then expand against resistance before it blows by a limit in pressure
The inherent incoming are consumed to establish the new "cell" of one #universe that's #cellular in structure preferred, not multiverse
🌊🏄♂️
https://t.co/IrlODoMc44
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
240.1M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.3M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.6M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
108.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
106.9M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
97.2M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.1M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
90.5M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
86.7M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
80.5M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
72.1M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
69.3M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.6M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
68.4M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
63.4M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.5M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.9M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
61M followers
X
@x
60.9M followers
CNN Breaking News
@cnnbrk
59.9M followers