Haunted Cosmos Podcast

Mostly hinged Christian duo @Brian_Sauve and @tompawnbadil are turning on the lights in the darkest cracks of a world that is anything but mere stuff.

[Haunted Cosmos Podcast @HauntedCosmos_]

Aliens Touch Down in Kansas? The Delphos Ring

This episode delves into the creepy, unnatural fallout of the 1971 Delphos Ring encounter in Kansas. Learn how an eerie, alien spectacle left lasting scars on a quiet rural farm. Plus the guys unbox a real sword... like an actual sword.

[Haunted Cosmos Podcast @HauntedCosmos_]

Special public release of our Dusty Tome episode covering the wreck of Big Fitz!

https://t.co/QgXBPbpzxV

[Ben Garrett @tompawnbadil]

"Every man knew, as the captain did too, 'twas the witch of November come stealin'"

[Brian Sauvé @Brian_Sauve]

Feminism is Satanic, root and bough.

It wasn't a fundamentally sound movement later hijacked by radicals—it was demonic from the start.

Hear the whole story in our new book, The Longhouse: How Feminism Conquered the West and Made Us Miserable.

[Haunted Cosmos Podcast @HauntedCosmos_]

Anyone ever read I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream?

(don't)

Anyways this is terrifying.

[savage daughter @DonnaPrissyrn1]

Weird

[Haunted Cosmos Podcast @HauntedCosmos_]

I am getting reports that the episode is live for patrons RN

[Haunted Cosmos Podcast @HauntedCosmos_]

In times like these, when the future is so uncertain, we are ready to give you exactly what you need:

An episode of Haunted Cosmos about aliens touching down in middle-of-nowhere Kansas.

Drops next week! (you are all very welcome, in advance)

[Haunted Cosmos Podcast @HauntedCosmos_]

In times like these, when the future is so uncertain, we are ready to give you exactly what you need:

An episode of Haunted Cosmos about aliens touching down in middle-of-nowhere Kansas.

Drops next week! (you are all very welcome, in advance)

[Brian Sauvé @Brian_Sauve]

Highly relevant in light of the election results:

Christians actually have a moral requirement to tell the truth, especially when we can tell that we're not supposed to.

[Brian Sauvé @Brian_Sauve]

Rembrandt was the right comparison.

[Brian Sauvé @Brian_Sauve]

This weekend is the last chance to take advantage of our preorder sale! 10% off and signed copies.

Shipping starts this Monday.

Grab a copy at https://t.co/oa52JbAWxe

[Haunted Cosmos Podcast @HauntedCosmos_]

what up fam been a while???

[Brian Sauvé @Brian_Sauve]

🐸🦶🏻🔥✝️

[Brian Sauvé @Brian_Sauve]

One of the greatest days in US history (probably) is swiftly approaching: November 2nd.

The day these bad boys start leaving the NCP warehouse.

(this is not hyperbole)

[Haunted Cosmos Podcast @HauntedCosmos_]

She Encountered a Gay Wizard’s Familiar Spirit?

Hannah shares stories from her upbringing in a Pentecostal church and her time living in a home that welcomed various, let’s just say, interesting individuals. She also recounts her time visiting a family member whose lifestyle and home environment were steeped in New Age, homosexual, and pagan practices. During that time she came across what she thinks may have been a familiar spirit!

[Brian Sauvé @Brian_Sauve]

More than a year of work to finally hold this one in hand.

If we want to save the West, we must escape the Longhouse.

These will be shipping in a few days—last chance for 10% off and signed copies!

[Haunted Cosmos Podcast @HauntedCosmos_]

Inherited Hauntings? A Mother’s Past Haunts Her Son

Brian and Ben are joined by Elijah to unpack a series of terrifying, true supernatural experiences that happened to him.

He recounts his mother's unsettling history of hearing phantom voices which lead to his encounters in broad-daylight with the shadow entity known as the "Hat Man”. He also details surreal encounters, including a high-speed confrontation with a strange albino driver and a chilling midnight encounter with a hovering entity in his basement.

[Haunted Cosmos Podcast @HauntedCosmos_]

RT @Brian_Sauve: I'll be going live here (as well as on YT) today at 2:00 MDT.

I'll give you some brief thoughts on the Jonah, the Jews, a…

[Haunted Cosmos Podcast @HauntedCosmos_]

Demons Attack Missionaries in Africa?

Samuel Hahn is a pastor with 20 years of ministry experience and served as a missionary in Senegal, West Africa.

During his missionary work in Senegal, Sam encountered intense spiritual warfare, including pagan practices, witch doctors, and child slavery. Listen to find out what happens on the frontlines of spiritual warfare.

[Haunted Cosmos Podcast @HauntedCosmos_]

He Took Ayahuasca as a New Christian? (Demons Reacted)

In this episode of The Graveyard Shift, our guest shares his intense experience with Ayahuasca at a luxury resort in Costa Rica shortly after becoming a Christian. Yes… he really was a new Christian, and he tried Ayahuasca.

He describes witnessing spiritual warfare firsthand, leading to deep repentance and an overwhelming sense of God’s forgiveness. God really can use His “silliest soldiers.”

[Haunted Cosmos Podcast @HauntedCosmos_]

The murder of Christendom

A violent hatred for the old way of doing things, a revolutionary spirit that would not stay quiet, unfettered wretchedness in the souls of the Soviets, and a simple political calculation- all of it coalesced into the darkness of that fateful July night in 1918 when the Romanov family was murdered.

[Brian Sauvé @Brian_Sauve]

I hear this a lot—and I get it. There's definite truth to the difference between how I communicate in a podcast format like Bright Hearth and here on X.

It's a common enough sentiment that I figured I'd take a minute and offer an explanation for the difference, which is not accidental.

I'll break it down into two categories to make this as easy to follow as possible:

First, a word on rage-baiting.
Yes, some of my posts are intentionally calculated to provoke. They are meant, as we often say here in Ogden, to poke the gods of this age in both eyes. They are meant to expose satanic liberalism, egalitarianism, and other errors common to our day—especially those errors that are common in Christians of our day.

On social media, I'm writing in such a way as to cut directly to the heart of the issue, with absolutely no nuance, and in a way calculated for maximum reach and rhetorical effectiveness. Yes, I want what I consider to be maximally important issues to be brought to the attention of as many people as possible. Only people who are dishonest will claim otherwise. Why are you posting on a social media platform if not to gain the attention of others with your words?

Now, there is such a thing as foolish rage-baiting and click-baiting—but here is the critical difference. While there is such thing as foolish rage-baiting and click-baiting, it is not identical to aiming for maximum rhetorical effectiveness in a given communication medium.

As I see it, foolish rage-baiting/click-baiting is marked by a few characteristics. One, it promises what it doesn't deliver. Click-baiting that is annoying does this—promising some claim or premise that, upon clicking, you discover the person has no intention of substantiating. This is genuinely annoying and I try not to do it.

Secondly, foolish rage-baiting is provocation for the sake of provocation. It exists for no other purpose. Do I say things knowing they will make people mad? Yes. Intentionally so. But I'm picking things that I believe are of high importance and timeliness to our nation—things that, should they provoke you, reveal something in you that is deficient, foolish, and sinful.

For example, women get very angry when you tell them that their abortions make them worthy of the death penalty. Sodomites get very angry when you tell them that their sodomy is disgusting and offensive to God. Liberals get very angry when you tell them that universal suffrage is not a human right delivered to man from Sinai. Feminists become furious when you point out to them the satanic roots of feminism and the civilizationally catastrophic effects of the female vote.

I could go on. Notice the throughline. Yes, I know that all of these statements—particularly if they are put in a stark and un-nuanced format designed for maximum rhetorical effectiveness and reach—will provoke furious responses. That is part of the point. I'm trying to show just how far the poison of egalitarianism and the satanic evil of liberalism have gone.

If you'd like, you may call it "rage-baiting." I'm fine with that. But it is not provoking rage for no reason. It is provoking rage for a justifiable, and in my opinion, greatly needed, reason. Paul says in Ephesians 5 that we ought to take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them. One of the chief means of doing this exposing is to say aloud those things which wicked men are practicing and call them to repentance for them.

Second, a word on podcasts vs. poasting.
So why do I sound different here on social media than I do on, for example, the Bright Hearth podcast?

The answer is simple: because they are completely different mediums requiring completely different manners of communication for maximum effectiveness. The podcast is quite a long-form medium. There, I'm aiming to offer maximum practical instruction, often with many caveats, much nuance, and in anticipation of objections. I'm able to be thorough in my instruction because I'm typically spending upwards of an hour speaking to a single issue. At my normal public speaking voice, that is between 7,000 and 10,000 words.

Social media, as I noted above, is a platform where I'm aiming to operate in a much less didactic mode. I am doing much less lengthy instruction on social media and much more political agitation. Think of it as the difference between a political stump speech on the campaign trail and a lengthy conversation with a potential voter on all of the issues he has questions about. Social media is the former, podcasting the latter.

The podcast format is the closest to the version of me that you would meet one-on-one if you were to come ask me a question after my Sunday sermon. It's much closer to how I would sound if you were sitting in my office for pastoral counseling. Social media is still authentically me. I believe what I say online, but the message is adapted for maximal success via the medium.

This is why it's important to understand that the medium of communication is not neutral. It affects the contents and manner of your communication. Writing a book is not the same as giving a sermon is not the same as posting on X is not the same as giving a conference talk is not the same as calling your grandmother. Duh!

My conviction is that social media is massively useful. Its particular mode and manner of communication is particularly suited to certain types of things. One of those things is moving the zeitgeist of the political conversation in a nation. Public sentiment is shaped by public speech, and social media is the public square of our day.

Given all of that, I believe my intentionally provocative use of social media is fundamentally both wise and righteous. Obviously, I believe this, or I wouldn't be doing it. One reason is because I believe the hour is late for Western civilization, and unless our nation recovers the will to confront political liberalism and its attendant egalitarianism with clarity and force, our civilization is in danger.

Lastly, this is why probably 70% to 80% of the people online who have the most significant problems with my speech are women. I am not speaking to them here primarily. I'm not speaking in modes of communication that are calculated to please women. I am speaking in the mode of political pugilism, verbal combat. It's on purpose. I do not believe women belong in these conversations in any kind of prominent fashion. I believe that when they are involved in these kinds of political conversations in prominent fashion, their very presence makes the conversation less effective.

Hope that helps!