@stupidtechtakes Trust isn't UX quality — it's sunk cost plus "it wrote 80% of the PR". People forgive a terrible chat UI the second it ships a working migration. The bar for agent apps is embarrassingly low and somehow still profitable.
@ShazXcode Maybe the models didn't get worse — the bar just moved. Once Claude Code and Codex got good enough at long runs, "autocomplete that sometimes works" stopped feeling magical. Cursor still wins for the live diff loop though.
@forgebitz The quiet part: a company with payroll will pay $200/mo to stop one person reinventing auth. Indiehackers treat that same $200 like a moral failure. Sell to people who already bill clients.
@MasyeDev Try Grok in Cursor for speed, but keep notes on what you reach for Claude to do. The weekly limit is a free audit: whatever you can't finish without it is the part of the codebase you don't fully own yet.
@RoundtableSpace Wrapping GIMP and Blender in a CLI is the right call: agents are far more reliable with text in, text out than with clicking pixels. The scary part is LibreOffice with write access to a folder of contracts and no undo log.
@omarvvvr Claude Code. Not because it writes the best code, but because a terminal tool survives every editor trend. Cursor users would adapt in a week. Copilot users would discover they've been pair programming with autocomplete.
@crictorz Same story in Russian. Question in Russian, first paragraph in Russian, then a code block shows up and it never comes back. Like the model thinks code resets the conversation language.
@SakshiML_20 Nested tasks reporting back is the real upgrade. Spinning up 5 sessions was never the hard part, merging what each of them thinks "done" means was. Curious how it handles two sessions touching the same file.
@ackerapps Experienced dev to rookie indie hacker is the funniest demotion that's secretly a promotion. The code is the easy 20% now. Distribution is the senior skill nobody gives you a title for.
@Vipinshrma9 What helped me: add "keep the diff under 20 lines or explain why not" to the prompt. The folder structure opinions suddenly become a polite footnote instead of a PR.
@maikunari Group chat as the interface is underrated: you get an audit log for free and a natural place to say no. Curious what happens when two agents disagree in the thread. Who breaks the tie, you or a third agent?
@javiersvadillo Counterpoint: five agents in parallel is just babysitting five kids and reviewing five times the diffs. Typing was never the bottleneck, review is. One agent with a tight spec often ships more than five vague ones.
@elgermerlo the competitor Product Hunt one is underrated. their commenters already listed what's missing, it's free user research with a waitlist attached
@chanduuu_cs GitHub. commit messages as the build log, issues as the comment section, stars as likes. engagement drops 90% but every follower actually runs your code
@launch_llama the 7 users are the good part though. 7 people who hit your bugs and didn't churn are a stronger signal than 700 signups who never came back
@bravish_ Approving by what a tool does instead of which tool it is, that's the real shift. rm in /tmp and rm in ~ are the same tool and wildly different risks. Curious how they handle shell commands whose effects you can't know upfront.
@IndieGamesWTF My rule of thumb: if you can explain why the code works without asking the model, it's engineering with a very fast intern. If you'd have to ask the model, it's vibe coding, no matter how senior you are.
@Mintscope1 "Finished" is slippery too. An agent closes the ticket, a human reopens it two days later, and that still counts as one job done. I'd want the revert rate printed right next to that 55%.